we're not going to no-lynch
Open 160 Bird 7P (GAME!) - before 823
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
Charnel: it's in exceedingly poor taste to try and tear down a wagon. I like baltar's vote and I understand the reasoning.
I know you're trying to be helpful but it would actually be better if you simply hopped on the wagon or waited until he has a chance to respond. The reasons for the votes will become clear to you after he wakes up.-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
Pay attention. The reason is there. no-lynch is a horrible, scummy idea.BloodCovenant wrote: I would have at least appreciated some reason for the vote
You shouldn't be ignoring the fact that a wagon has formed, on you.BloodCovenant wrote: Me? What am I specifically responding too?
You clearly don't understand what's going on here, so let me try again. You need to explain why you believe a no-lynch on D1 with this setup is a good idea.-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
That's exactly why you're one of my top suspects right now. It's a scummy thing to do, whether your intentions were good or not is pretty irrelevant. If you don't want negative attention don't do negative things.BloodCovenant wrote: why? Because I voted No lynch to start up discussion? I can understand the Yabba argument, he seems to be putting cases on people (muzz) with nothing at all really-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
If you're not, then you need to say that you aren't so we can go about scum hunting. Expecting that we're all just going to assume that it was a joke vote only makes you look scummier.BloodCovenent wrote:
Wait... you seriously believe that I am pushing for a no lynch?hohum wrote:
Pay attention. The reason is there. no-lynch is a horrible, scummy idea.BloodCovenant wrote: I would have at least appreciated some reason for the vote
You shouldn't be ignoring the fact that a wagon has formed, on you.BloodCovenant wrote: Me? What am I specifically responding too?
You clearly don't understand what's going on here, so let me try again. You need to explain why you believe a no-lynch on D1 with this setup is a good idea.
You said you wanted to provide discussion fodder and that's what you're doing. Don't bitch about being in the spotlight. I shouldn't have to explain why deviating from the normal practice of random voting in any way is a scum tell, even if it's only a minor one.
You're still at the top of my list.
Unvote, Vote Yabba-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
Clearly our posts cross paths, so I'm only going to address what I feel I haven't in my last post.
I feel a game theory debate coming on here, which I'm happy to sit here and have with you. But you need to realize my main issue with what you're doing is that my vote was directed at him, not you. You should feel free to voice your opinion; however, when something is not specifically directed at you then you need to have enough courtesy to let the target respond first. Otherwise it's going to appear as if you're defending rather blatantly.Yabba wrote:I'm puzzled. You got ticked at me because I asked what I believed to be legitimate questions. I've seen several games where people also get annoyed for wagoning at a rapid pace, and that's where my confusion came in.
I throw my vote around because it's the only tool that I have. Wagons are the only tool that the town has to effectively coordinate an attack and pressure people. People who like to pick apart quick wagons are simply wrong for doing so and they're doing the town a grave disservice.-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
You think I'm talking about Baltar. I'm not. I'm talking about bloodcovenent.
That's fine and dandy but the only way to properly judge a wagon is in hindsight: with acctual evidence to go on. Otherwise you're just going to tie yourself up into WIOFMY knots. You're also going to make the mistake of confusing someone's pressure vote for a bad case and you're going to end up lynching the wrong person eventually.Yabba wrote:Now sometimes, wagons can have another effect. Sometimes you can see that some of the latecomers on the wagon come up with a lousy excuse, and then you vote them for being opportunistic. In that case, the wagon serves a different pro-town purpose. While I think claiming there was nonexistant reasoning was incorrect, sometimes that happens.
Yabba wrote:Throwing a vote around? Could be pegged as inconsistency, obviously depends.hohum wrote: How would you suggest we go about scum hunting then?-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
I'm not rushing anything. There's only one person we haven't heard from so far.
I'm also not asking you to make a suspect list. You said a few posts ago that it's okay to be suspicious of people. By that I'm assuming you meant it's okay to give your opinion of people because it would otherwise be super hypocritical of you to tell me that me that I shouldn't be making lists of suspects but then turn around a few posts later and tell me it's okay to be suspicious of people.
I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt here but you're not making it very easy with glaring contradictions in your thought processes.
I want to know where your opinion of the people who have posted so far is, seeing as we've already heard from almost everyone in the game. It isn't an unreasonable thing of me to ask.-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
BTW it's perfectly okay for you to say "I have no read on XXXX"
That is a satisfactory answer. I'm not trying to force you to have an opinion. I just want to know if you do and what it is because it will help ME get a better read on YOU.
I'm specifically interested in knowing what you currently think of me, since as you pointed out you and I have interacted the most.-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
I'd like you to point out for the classroom where I actually ever said I wasn't making suspect lists. I'm more than happy to, and I'm not the one who objected.BloodCovenent wrote:So, nothing like this here? Right?
yea...hohum wrote: I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt here but you're not making it very easy with glaringcontradictionsin your thought processes.
He is.-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
@BloodCovenant: I also noticed you're dodging questions. You've been asked something twice, and now I'm getting sort of curious myself. See post 44, post 33. You've posted twice now without answering. It shows you're either not really paying attention or you just don't care. Either way, it's scummy as hell and you need to stop.-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
I would have come after you for the self-vote too. If I'm ever in a game with Mastin I'll go after him too. You keep saying how all you're trying to do is provide discussion fodder yet you seem to be annoyed that we're talking about it.BloodCovenent wrote:
No, i was asked it once.hohum wrote:@BloodCovenant: I also noticed you're dodging questions. You've been asked something twice, and now I'm getting sort of curious myself. See post 44, post 33. You've posted twice now without answering. It shows you're either not really paying attention or you just don't care. Either way, it's scummy as hell and you need to stop.
Muzz regarding 33 - I understood VP's vote, but with Hohum's vote, it was bandwagoning. What I wasn't comfortable with per-say, was how he started a thought, and i felt he didn't complete it. By him tunneling me, suggest that I really want a no-lynch, is scummy in itself. I do not want a no lynch, i used that as a way to get out of the RVS, for after we're through with the RVS, the real fun begins.
This is complete bullshit. Just because I vote for this,hohum wrote:
If you're not, then you need to say that you aren't so we can go about scum hunting. Expecting that we're all just going to assume that it was a joke vote only makes you look scummier.as my first vote,which wasgiven during the random vote stage,, that it was aindicatesrandom vote! Would it have been better if I just voted myself like mastin? you still would have taken it the wrong way. Check my Meta, i've started off at least one other game with a vote for no-lynch.
BTW having to use SOMEONE ELSE'S meta to support your own actions is scummy.
Here's why random votes can be telling. MS has well established procedures for doing things like kicking of discussion (the RVS), bringing a wagon to a lynch (ask for a claim, discuss the claim, lynch the wagonee), etc. These are merely best practices; however, as a town-aligned player there's really very little reason to deviate from these practices because they areWIDELYused.
The severity of deviation is debatable; however, it *IS* a scum tell, and it *DOES* merit discussion. To that end you succeeded in what your stated goal was: you got us out of the RVS; however, it is still a scum tell and I will talk about it all I want. I will talk about it until the end of the fucking game if I damned well please because it will help me get a better read on you.
Get one thing straight: I will vote for WHOEVER I damned well please in order to aide myself in getting reads on people, pressuring them for information, etc.BloodCovenent wrote:
I'm not bitching about being in the spotlight, i'm bitching about your stupidity! Have you ever played with Mastin! He always claims scum, gives his scum-partners, and self votes, is that the normal too?hohum wrote: You said you wanted to provide discussion fodder and that's what you're doing. Don't bitch about being in the spotlight. I shouldn't have to explain why deviating from the normal practice of random voting in any way is a scum tell, even if it's only a minor one.
Then keep your vote on me damnit!hohum wrote: You're still at the top of my list.
Unvote, Vote Yabba
You're wrong. Period. Clearly you need to go play in some more newbie gamesbloodcovenant wrote:
You inadvertently contradicted yourself, where did you do it? In the quote of yours above this one.hohum wrote:
I throw my vote around because it's the only tool that I have.
Wrong, picking apart some wagons can be very helpful for the town.hohum wrote:
. People who like to pick apart quick wagons are simply wrong for doing so and they're doing the town a grave disservice.
I'm not tunneling. I'm asking both of you questions in order to get a better read on the both of you. I'll keep doing this until I'm satisfied with the result.BloodCovenant wrote:
Hohum: quite tunneling.hohum wrote:BloodCovenenant: quit defending your scum buddy.
Now that's totally uncalled for. I'll expect an apology at the end of the game when I'm proven to be correct.BloodCovenant wrote:
seriously dude?hohum wrote:@BloodCovenant: I also noticed you're dodging questions. You've been asked something twice, and now I'm getting sort of curious myself. See post 44, post 33. You've posted twice now without answering. It shows you're either not really paying attention or you just don't care. Either way, it's scummy as hell and you need to stop.your so gay, he asked one question...one. I'm not dodging questions, just overlooked it. I thought it was rhetorical, and I missed his post 44. You are taking a very large leap in saying that I am not paying attention, or me not caring. I do care, i'm just also in other games that this one, you of all people should know. Like I said, i over looked it, but I have responded to it now. It is not scummy as hell, and what do I need to stop? Something that cannot be stopped? If i've missed something, please, kindly point it out, don't dramatically thrust it on me, and suddenly call me scum becuase of it. You are taking huge assumptions, and twisting them to suit your purposes.
Also, scum points for you. I see you'd rather resort to ad-hom attacks than take me seriously. Do so at your own peril.
The problem is question dodging is indeed a scum tell. A major one too.BloodCovenant wrote:
question dodging is not a scumtell at this point in time! Maybe if i was askedseveral, not justonequestion at deadline, and I posted several times, all evading the questions could you accuse me of that, and accuse me of being scumat that point in time,not now.
yabbaguy wrote: -BC, why are you blatantly defending me? Post 49 is really crappy, honestly. Where do you stand on hohum? Where do you stand on me?
This post screams "WE'RE BOTH SCUM, LYNCH US!" to me.
Wrong answer. If you were indeed town-aligned then you should find me at least somewhat suspicious. My vote is currently on you and I have been pressuring you, after all. Your response indicates that you have some inside knowledge of the setup.Yabbaguy wrote: You hohum, I'm well in the green at the moment. You're very actively engaged in finding scum, and that's good. What I'm not a fan of is that your scumhunting is trying to get me to do things I would not ordinarily do, like post a suspect list NOW when I would rather just be silently collecting notes.-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
Glad to see you joined the discussion. It's a very contextual question. There's usually a lot going on in your typical mafia game so sometimes getting information out of people is the priority; however, on the whole pack mentality in this game is a good thing and not a bad thing so I would typically aide a wagon if I have nothing better to do.Octupis wrote:Which of these do you find more important, throwing your vote around or aiding bandwagons?-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
I don't need to slow down. There isn't 5 mysterious people in this game that we haven't heard from yet. We've heard from EVERYONE at this point.
This setup is essentially a smaller at faster version of the F11 setup run in the newbie queues. This particular setup rarely goes longer than 15-20 pages total, spread out over 2, 3 or 4 days. With 7 people things should be expected to move along at a slightly more rapid pace.
You're just looking for an excuse to back me off, and it isn't going to work.
What I meant by inside knowledge, is you seem to know who is scum and who isn't -- which means YOU'RE scum.-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
So what? He's at least asking questions and making a concerted effort to do some scum hunting, even if his contributions have been marginal up to this point. I answered his question and now I'm waiting to hear what he thinks of my answer. That's generally how this works.
You on the other hand aren't doing anything other than offering color commentary.-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
QFT.Octupis wrote: Yes, what is your problem with that? You have not actually wrote anything productive, and then asked if I was going to post again? I am a newbie, but I think this is known as active lurking.
@Charnel: are you going to actually do any scum hunting this game?
Who do you find suspicious and why?-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
Also has anyone else noticed how neither Yabba nor BloodCovenant expressed any concern over the fact that I've referred to them as scum buddies several times already and I even went as far as to say that BC was defending Yabba (which yabba agreed with, BTW) and now they're trying to put some distance in between each other?-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
If you know anything about Charnel then you need to share it with the rest of us, as it could drastically alter the outcome of this game.Baltar wrote:Please don't forget that I know who you are. Don't expect to play the noob card in this game. +1 scumpoint
The fact that they're now attacking each other and nobody else after an invigorating round of defending one another.Baltar wrote:
What makes you feel so?hohum wrote:now they're trying to put some distance in between each other?
I think he's doing fine. Remember, small game, doesn't require loads of attention. That's why it's given to newbie mods so often in the open game queue.Baltar wrote:Ok, fully caught up. Mod, vote counts a bit more frequently please
Try taking your own notes, it will probably help you in the long run, and I'm not just talking about being clued into vote counts either.-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
If charnel really wanted privacy he would have kept it a secret from you too. The fact that you know is pause for suspicion. You two working together, or what?VP Baltar wrote:@hohum
re:Charnel--he is an alt for someone else. I won't reveal who out of respect for privacy, but playing the newbie card is shady at best.
I'm an alt too, but I don't hide behind that fact. I'm very open about my meta.-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
Post a link please. If he "accidentally" outed himself it should not matter anymore. Why bother keepng it a secret if it's already public knowledge?
I'm a dcorbe alt. Some of my gameplay has been admittedly piss-poor but that's not the reason for the alt. The reason for the alt is my name is "Daniel Corbe" and I just simply don't want my bad behavior on MS linked to me when you google search my name (or at least I wanted to attempt to minimize it)-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
I don't really care whether you think it will help me or not. That's just an excuse not to reveal your alt.
Cut your losses now. If you REALLY want to play with some privacy then create another account and be more careful about outing yourself in the future.
Your meta may or may not be helpful, but that's for me to decide, not you.-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
Interesting. Maybe this will convince you to be a little more honest with me:
Unvote, Vote Charnel
I take your refusal to respond as a translation to this:
If I'm wrong then please feel free to set the record straight, and post links to what I've been asking for.Charnel wrote:I accidentally outed myself in our quicktopic for this thread. I don't want to post the link because it will confirm that I am scum
@Baltar: You fucked up dude. You shouldn't have said anything. I would have gone right on blissfully trying to lynch Yabba or BC.-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
Not to state the obvious here, but I could give a fuck about your alts. Your refusal to share information with the town is way more interesting to me than your meta. I'm going to be taking a closer look at Baltar now for the same reason.Charnel wrote: Hohum, you are surprisingly aggressive for a person who could have looked at all the games VP and I posted together in
I obviously just telegraphed my intentions with the last 3 posts because I don't know how to read, so I'll have to come up with a better way to put some pressure on you.[/quote]-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
You're still in school, right?
If you can't tell the difference subjectively between a verb (your actions, you fucked up) and a noun (you are a fuck up) when in a subjective context, then you should consider asking your guidance counselor to give you more English classes next year.
Seriously, work on your reading comprehension problems.
I laughed.-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
On a more serious note, I'll gladly tone down my language if it will help resolve any personality conflicts.
I find the use of strong language to be an effective cage-rattling tool so my default mode of operation is always to be as aggressive as possible. I also realize that this game largely revolves around social dynamics, so if I'm making anyone other than bloodcovenant uncomfortable then let me know and I'll stop.
I have a feeling that this post alone will be enough to take some of the edge off.-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley
-
-
hohum Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Uncle Potbear
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: July 22, 2008
- Location: Shenandoah Valley