I might be stupid, but lowell hasn't even voted.. erm..gameplayah wrote:Vote: Lowellfor voting third on a bandwagon (that's the custom where I play usually; vote third, get lynched)
tath did.
I do agree with this, but i believe it as a gamestyle, and not as scumtell. At least, at this point of the game.Max is being more meta than helpful. The meaningless questions, the one-liners
Well..I'll take a pass on it.
I think the game is having a slow start, yes.Has the game advanced at a pace you are happy with? If not why not?
Which player has generated the most attention in your opinion? Is that rightfully so?
Who has remained under the radar? Should they have?
Is there a player who needs to pick up activity? Who?
Your elaborate annoys me.Wdjat wrote:kyle99 wrote:ElaborateWdjat wrote:I have town vibes from Gheb and Gayle, scumvibes from max, and mostly null-reads on everyone else.ElaborateThe1fifi wrote:Lol, i don't like gheb's play.
This post sounds unbelievably townie.danakillsu wrote:Well, look. Suddenly "reads" changes to "read". And you call it the same thing. Pressuring for a single read on him is not the same as pressuring for all of my reads. I already have explained my reason for voting for him originally. Stop making such a big deal out of this. You're making yourself look scummy by trying to make me the focus of everyone's attention (not that I mind that so much, I have nothing to hide).
Bold 1 - Thats something that also picked my attention, but not exaclty the most blatant scumtell.Gayle wrote:Gheb wrote:Unvote Vote Jacob Savage
Pressure vote.What kind of reaction are you expecting from something like this?
@Fifi:Why exactly are you voting kunk? Because he is attacking someone you find townie?
This game is so slow. Anybody wanna argue with me about something vaguely related to the game so we can get some posts?
I'd be happy with a no lynch to ofc. But i never done a no lynch, and what i heard from more experienced players is that it never is beneficial in d1@Fifi: You want to wagon him based on gut and because the game is slow? What? Are you saying you are willing to lynch him over nothing?
... Over a myslinch -.-Gayle wrote:Why in the world would you be happy with a no lynch?The1fifi wrote:I'd be happy with a no lynch to ofc. But i never done a no lynch, and what i heard from more experienced players is that it never is beneficial in d1
This resumes everything you do. Instead of scumhunting, you are playing a tactic of smokes and mirrors.tatetothetot wrote:Wdjat, lynching you would help me determine Dana's alignment. I believe that out of the two of you, one of you is scum.
The1fifi was voting lowell at the time but there were several others who were putting pressure just because others had done so. Krunk and Kyle for example
I have already stated that Gayle had a similar style of posting from another game I was in with him. The difference between him and lurkers voting for Max is that, Max was attacking his thoughts, not his lack of activity.
Yes I am buddying to Max. He probably doesn't want that, but I did it anyways.
?
Why don't you post thoughts instead of massing questions and telling people to elaborate
So you don't believe the claim, but you unvote and believe that those who belive in the claim aren't scum, excluding the possibility of wdjat being scum, after he pressuring you. Plus you ignored his acusations in his post, made 1 hour before yours.danakillsu wrote:Actually, yeah. That's true. Let's give him a chance to tell us what he finds in the night.I do enough to not risk lynching a cop on day 1.
unvote
And I think I shouldn't vote for wdjat,because I don't believe lowell's claimand I don't think they can both be scum. (THIS IS WHY I DROPPED MY CASE ON WDJAT IN THE FIRST PLACE).
vote: kyle99in hopes that he will start contributing to this game.
...danakillsu wrote:This makes absolutely no sense! I didn't vote for wdjat becauseSo you don't believe the claim, but you unvote and believe that those who belive in the claim aren't scum, excluding the possibility of wdjat being scum, after he pressuring you. Plus you ignored his acusations in his post, made 1 hour before yours.I still believe that lowell is scum,and I don't believe they can both be scum. I didn't vote for lowell becausehe might actually be a cop, and I want to give him a chance to investigate. What about that is hard to understand, in words that I can understand?
Thats what i call being stupid or tryin to misrep. Obviously, if he gets killed we don't need his investigations to possibly confirm his claim, do we? And i didn't say rely. I said he should give us his investigation results, in case he lives through the night.kunkstar7 wrote:If you don't have an opinion as to whether he will make it through the night, then how can you make a statement that we should rely on Lowell's results after tonight?