So what are the tells you found, Kyle?kyle99 wrote:Really, in the last 2 pages of posts, nothing is giving you any tells? Perhaps you should reread.
Oh boy you're one of "those" people. RVS is random. I mean, it's in the name. When you try to discuss those votes and get crap like this defense. And all these benefits of RVS you're talking about sound suspiciously like discussion, something that questions are going to spark. Like the way you're talking about RVS as opposed to RQS, you'd think that we put random crap in bold letters and then magically we are playing mafia. No, we do have to actually discuss things at some point. And what are we going to discuss based on the content of the following posts?
These two posts show your real intent in post 7.Dude. RANDOM voting stage. It is for shits and giggles. That's why it's worthless.
Fine. You and Max seem to mostly agree against kyle99 and Gayle, who also mostly agree with each other. There's been a lot of trying to pick apart useless statements, and not a lot of actually bringing up anything to do with scumminess.Elaborate
I have a few town tells and a small scumvibe from max, but nothing major. I just don't see how he didn't get any tells so far.Gayle wrote:So what are the tells you found, Kyle?kyle99 wrote:Really, in the last 2 pages of posts, nothing is giving you any tells? Perhaps you should reread.
@Max:You provided a list of suspects, but can you tell me what exactly you find scummy about them?
Have you considered the post in the context of posts 5 and 6? You know, the jokes?danakillsu wrote:These two posts show your real intent in post 7.
You mean the votes on Max from Gayle and kyle99 and my vote on Gayle are just there for funsies? You don't think there's suspicions about alignment based on this argument?danakillsu wrote:You and Max seem to mostly agree against kyle99 and Gayle, who also mostly agree with each other. There's been a lot of trying to pick apart useless statements, and not a lot of actually bringing up anything to do with scumminess.
Any reactions in this thread jump out at you so far?kunkstar7 wrote:I can't really side in either the RVS or RQS as both of them work to get a game out of the beginning. Just most games use RVS. A lot of them end with a discussion of the merits of the RVS. Its all a matter of reviewing what reactions players give to these random questions or votes.
You guys might have some reason that only you know for drawing battle lines, but I don't see any of them. That's what I'm saying. Now let's stop discussing what I don't see as tells and start trying to actually find someone scummy.You mean the votes on Max from Gayle and kyle99 and my vote on Gayle are just there for funsies? You don't think there's suspicions about alignment based on this argument?
_________________
Absolutely. But I see you true motives in post 7 from the posts I quoted earlier. You weren't just saying "let's stop joking", you were saying "let's leave the RVS".Have you considered the post in the context of posts 5 and 6? You know, the jokes?
Why is pressuring you for your reads not searching for scummy? As it were I find that you trying to diverge away from that point is suspicious, as it can be a scumtell, you might be avoiding the situation because its your partner under suspicion. Just because you might not see a scumtell in it doesn't mean others might not, and trying to just get away from it doesn't look good.danakillsu wrote:You guys might have some reason that only you know for drawing battle lines, but I don't see any of them. That's what I'm saying. Now let's stop discussing what I don't see as tells and start trying to actually find someone scummy.
So figuring out the reasoning behind people's votes that stand behind as legitimate scumhunting is a waste of time?danakillsu wrote:You guys might have some reason that only you know for drawing battle lines, but I don't see any of them. That's what I'm saying. Now let's stop discussing what I don't see as tells and start trying to actually find someone scummy.You mean the votes on Max from Gayle and kyle99 and my vote on Gayle are just there for funsies? You don't think there's suspicions about alignment based on this argument?
Oh man, Encyclopedia Brown is on the case! Look at that detective work! I'm disappointed to see it not being put to use on like any other post in the thread, though.danakillsu wrote:Absolutely. But I see you true motives in post 7 from the posts I quoted earlier. You weren't just saying "let's stop joking", you were saying "let's leave the RVS".Have you considered the post in the context of posts 5 and 6? You know, the jokes?
Your elaborate annoys me.Wdjat wrote:kyle99 wrote:ElaborateWdjat wrote:I have town vibes from Gheb and Gayle, scumvibes from max, and mostly null-reads on everyone else.ElaborateThe1fifi wrote:Lol, i don't like gheb's play.
I find this post completely useless. You provide no direction as to what kind of elaboration you are requesting.Wdjat wrote:kyle99 wrote:ElaborateWdjat wrote:I have town vibes from Gheb and Gayle, scumvibes from max, and mostly null-reads on everyone else.ElaborateThe1fifi wrote:Lol, i don't like gheb's play.
You've got to be kidding me. wdjat was NOT pressuring me for reads on other people, he was pressuring me for why I was voting for him. This looks like a bad excuse to continue exactly what I just said was pointless. I'm going to leave wdjat for now, though, because I'm really annoyed by JacobSavage's lack of involvement here.Why is pressuring you for your reads not searching for scummy? As it were I find that you trying to diverge away from that point is suspicious, as it can be a scumtell, you might be avoiding the situation because its your partner under suspicion. Just because you might not see a scumtell in it doesn't mean others might not, and trying to just get away from it doesn't look good.