Mini 681 - Mish Mash Mafia - THE END!

[letsbefriends]

Huh? That still makes no sense. o_o

The person who you vote for will be the one who becomes the executioner. If you think Caboose is scummy, then you

wouldn't

vote him.

[Caboose]

Scum won't want to be elected executioner, necessarily -

Yes they do. It's like giving them two nightkills.

it'd be wiser to push a lynch on a pro-town player who would kill another pro-town.

Then, the scum are leaving a lot up to chance. They are just hoping that the pro-town executioner they choose won't kill them or their scumbuddies.

That is why saying who you'd kill if selected is a bad idea - scum can push for a lynch that will give them a double kill of town.

Not a bad idea at all. Scum can push for a lynch of a pro-town player anyway in a normal game. And if people already tell who they are going to kill, then we're shifting the power from the executioner to the town, which I think is going to work for us in the end.

My vote stays

Any proof? Any reason to support your answer? How is my suggestion anti-town? And you know that you are voting for me for executioner, right?

[Knight of Cydonia]

Yes. I'd rather see 1 scum and 1 town die, than 2 town and then the NK.

[letsbefriends]

Yes. I'd rather see 1 scum and 1 town die, than 2 town and then the NK.

I wasn't aware that the executioner commits suicide...

How are you so sure that Caboose is scum? I also thought you didn't want to say who you would kill, but I think it's pretty obvious now though.

[Caboose]

I'm sorry, maybe I don't understand the rules. Someone please explain them to me.

Yes. I'd rather see 1 scum and 1 town die, than 2 town and then the NK.

You refuse to answer my questions, or try to counter my points. Your points are weak, you don't follow them up, and you dodge questions about them. Does anyone else besides me find that scummy?

[Tovarish]

Scum always try to steer lynches, regardless of tyhe game. that's what they do and its our job to find out. They can win a double kill in a regular game too, KoC is being completely asinine.

[sekinj]

If elected, I will kill sekinj.

Why?!

[Tovarish]

Nothin' personal, you were just the first post I looked at when deciding who my counterpart will be. that way, if we think you're scum, everybody votes me and I kill you. i'm hoping everybody chooses a target, and we vote for the executioner with the target we want dead. And the executioner, while totally within their rights to kill someone other than their named target, should be compelled to do so, because kiling a different person is just really, really, scummy

[ShadowGirl]

I don't think would partial to getting elected or whether the person they choose kills another pro-town: it still ends up in the same outcome for them. Well, the executioner does still have their right to kill whomever they wish.

But yeah, KoC I think you're vote is misplaced - you're voting for Caboose to be executioner. Perhaps we should use FoSes for whom we find scummy, and not votes? We just need to somehow distinguish between the two.

[Caboose]

MUAHAHAHAHAHA

YOU HAVE TO ELECT THE EXECUTIONER

"I see you have found your way to the arena", says the voice over
"The rules are simple, each player has a vote, vote for the person who you wish to determine the dead person, unfortunately on the chopping board there is a gun, with a single bullet, upon the person being chosen to die another will be shot."

You start murmuring amongst yourselves, and realise that its a dilemma lynch scum and town certainly dies, lynch town and town certainly dies.

After a while you remember you have to play the game, so Pronto

I don't get this part, could someone please explain that to me.

I don't think would partial to getting elected or whether the person they choose kills another pro-town: it still ends up in the same outcome for them.

Well, the executioner does still have their right to kill whomever they wish

.

That's exactly why we should follow my suggestion. If we just elect the person who seems "most pro-town" then we concentrate all that power into one person who we don't know to be scum or town. If we bind everyone to a target, we diffuse the power to the majority.

Now, what I have trouble understanding is how people find the above to be scummy on my part.

[RestFermata]

Late first post. Sorry! Gotta read the thread and rules now, hold on a sec.

[RestFermata]

Upon reading the rules, I got the impression that we vote for whom we want to lynch, but the lynched person gets to kill one other before they go down. You guys all seem to be interpreting it differently, so maybe I'm wrong. But that's how I read it.

[Caboose]

Upon reading the rules, I got the impression that we vote for whom we want to lynch, but the lynched person gets to kill one other before they go down. You guys all seem to be interpreting it differently, so maybe I'm wrong. But that's how I read it.

Oh, so once someone is executed, they get to use a vig kill/scum extra kill?

[RestFermata]

That's the way I read it, but don't take my word for it.

[Caboose]

If I have that right, I certainly think we should vote for the scummiest.

Yes. I'd rather see 1 scum and 1 town die, than 2 town and then the NK.

So, let me get this straight. You view my non-scummy action as a scumtell, label me as scum for it, fail to rebut any of my points, dodge my questions, and then act like you know my alignment for certain?

Does anybody besides me find that scummy, or is it just me?

[Caboose]

Oh, and I almost forgot.

Vote: Knight of Cydonia

[Caboose]

"I see you have found your way to the arena", says the voice over
"The rules are simple, each player has a vote, vote for the person who you wish to determine the dead person, unfortunately on the chopping board there is a gun, with a single bullet, upon the person being chosen to die another will be shot."

Wait, I misread that. I think we choose the executioner who kills someone. Then the player that dies get a kill. In that case

Unvote

.

If elected, I will bind myself to the target of Knight.

[RestFermata]

Wait. I think I was wrong. Now I think we elect the executioner via vote, he/she kills someone, and then the person who was killed by the executioner gets to make one last kill.

[Caboose]

A vanilla 3:9 is the set-up

(With a vengeful killing D1)

Yeah, I think that RestFermata is right.

[ShadowGirl]

Yeah, after rereading I'm getting the impression that it is how it's supposed to work. Lynchee gets a vig. So, KoC's vote does make sense.

Hn, so that means today [and tonight] we would be losing a total of three people, then.

Well, I understand KoC's points, but he should have given more then a one line response.

I'm still reading it like the lynchee dies and gets a shot. :/

[RestFermata]

I don't think so, ShadowGirl. According to my role PM, neither side can directly kill the other; that's what the mish mash games are for. So there probably won't be a standard NK. The game might even be nightless.

[ShadowGirl]

Mm, I think it's probable that it's nightless considering the role PM.

Alright, so we aren't voting for whom we think the scummiest then, if they're not getting lynched.

[sekinj]

Dang it. now you guys have me confused.

Here is MY understanding of it: The town Elects the Executioner who chooses the lynchee who gets to take one shot.

Example:
The town of Anna, Berry, Chris, Egor, and Danny vote for Anna (

Vote/Elect: Anna

)
Anna chooses to lynch Chris, and then Chris chooses to shoot Danny.
Result: Chris and Danny die Day 1. Anna, Berry and Egor take their chances during N1.

I think we should use

Vote/Elect

for who we want to be the executioner,

Lynch

for who we think should be lynched and

Shoot

if we want to add our two cents on who should be shot.

[ShadowGirl]

I like the above method. <3

[MafiaSSK]

I like Sekinj's method as well.