Mini 591: Re-Infiltration - GAME OVER!

[somestrangeflea]

Once Upon a Time...

Psychobob - 2 (alvinz95, Evilgorrilaz)
OG Smokedank - 2 (Psychobob, riceballtail)
evilgorillaz - 1 (roflcopter)
SensFan - 1 (Talmadge Monroe)
pojedinac - 1 (Xtoxm)
alvinz95 - 1 (pojedinac)

Not Voting - OG Smokedank, Anatole Kuragin, Ythill, SensFan

12 alive, 7 to lynch.

Prods have been sent to OG Smokedank and SensFan.

[Xtoxm]

Sens just got replaced for inactivity in another game i'm in, so he'll probably no-show here too, btw.

[roflcopter]

lets go fishing

unvote, vote: anatole

why do you need to make excuses for not being here in the beginning of random voting?
more importantly why do you have to ask us who is scummy when you could look at peoples' posts and decide for yourself?
i think its because you don't want to slip up and expose yourself as scum, but by being so overcautious you may already have done so.

[SensFan]

Sens just got replaced for inactivity in another game i'm in, so he'll probably no-show here too, btw.

No, I was just not aware the day had commenced, but nice try.

Non-Random

Vote: rofl

.

[Xtoxm]

You got removed from another game for inactivity - Do you employ lurking as a strategy?

Why do you think rofl is scum?

[Evilgorrilaz]

FoS: SensFan

Explain your vote.

[SensFan]

You got removed from another game for inactivity - Do you employ lurking as a strategy?

You do not know the circumstances behind me be replaced in that other game, so I will ask you to drop it. I have already given a perfectly good explanation for not posting here until now.

[Xtoxm]

I didn't ask you what the circumstances were, and you have avoided my question.

I did not question your reason for not posting until now, the point I brought up was merely a conclusion draw - If you are replaced for inactivity in one game, it raises the chance that you are going to be in another, regardless of potential reasoning.

[Xtoxm]

You also still haven't responded to requests for reasoning of your vote.

[Talmadge Monroe]

The non-random vote is not a great thing, so I too would like to hear the explanations.

I don't think I agree with rofl's line of thinking on anatole, but I'll hold judgment until ana replies.

[Ythill]

It's way too early for a lurker hunt and Rice's vote post bothers me for a couple of reasons.

vote: Riceballtail

Making an effort to be less longwinded this game, BTW.

[pojedinac]

Unvote
Vote: SensFan

Please explain the non-randomness of your vote...

[alvinz95]

Yes please explain Sensfan.

[SensFan]

I voted rofl cause he has a funny avatar, does it really matter?

[Xtoxm]

unvote vote SF

.

That's not what you said earlier, and you again elect to ignore my question on lurking.

[SensFan]

Actually, that's EXACTLY what I said. It was not a RANDOM vote, it was an ARBITRARY vote, hence, it was NON-RANDOM.

I have already asked you to drop the subject of my activity. Please do so, or I will request replacement.

[alvinz95]

Non-Random

Vote: rofl.

I voted rofl cause he has a funny avatar, does it really matter?

Actually, that's EXACTLY what I said. It was not a RANDOM vote, it was an ARBITRARY vote, hence, it was NON-RANDOM.

I have already asked you to drop the subject of my activity. Please do so, or I will request replacement.

The only thing I can make of these posts is that:
1. You are trying to confuse Xtoxm and the town. Post 40
2. Are giving up by threatening to request replacement. Post 40
3. Trying to stay under the radar after being pressured to give a reason for a "non-random" vote. Post 38
4. Calls a "non-random" vote a joke Post 38

Overall, you've been most scummy, so for now.

Vote: Sensfan

[alvinz95]

Sorry,

unvote

Vote: Sensfan

forgot to unvote before

[SensFan]

2. Are giving up by threatening to request replacement. Post 40

Unvote, Vote: alvin

Way to completely misrepresent what I said and take it out of context. What I said was that if Xtoxm continued to attack me personally on a matter that has no relation to this game, I would ask to be replaced. I play Mafia for fun, not to be attacked personally. If you had read the rules, you would have noticed a rule that anyone harming your ability to have fun will be dealt with.

[Xtoxm]

I have not attacked you personally. I asked you a question based off of a meta on you.

[SensFan]

Meh, I will not answer questions not related to this game. Also loling that you call needing to be replaced in single game due to extenuating circumstances 'a meta'.

[alvinz95]

Way to completely misrepresent what I said and take it out of context. What I said was that if Xtoxm continued to attack me personally on a matter that has no relation to this game, I would ask to be replaced. I play Mafia for fun, not to be attacked personally. If you had read the rules, you would have noticed a rule that anyone harming your ability to have fun will be dealt with.

Misinterpreted I may have (I'm sorry though, I didn't reread the previous posts too carefully), but such a big reaction (a vote) to a statement is scummy. If a person is to misinterpret things, the best thing to do is to just tell the person that they have misinterpreted your words. It is only a good reason to vote when the person is on full attack mode on someone and using it as hard facts to support a lynch, which clearly isn't my intentions this early into the game.

[SensFan]

My vote was arbitrarily placed earlier. Surely any in-game reason, however small, for voting should be enough for me to switch it? I do not at all support your lynch at this point, but you did something I found worth noting, while rofl had my vote for no good reason.

[Xtoxm]

Meh, I will not answer questions not related to this game. Also loling that you call needing to be replaced in single game due to extenuating circumstances 'a meta'.

Well, a one game meta on someone gives you a better feel for them than none.

I can accept that there were particular circumstances for needing replacement, your posting during said game was sporadic, one assumes the worst.

Apologies if you were offended, that was not my intentions...

I quite like using meta arguments if I notice something with people i've played before, although I know some people don't. And I guess any potential meta on you is null, given your role in said game is still alive.

Nonetheless, I have not found you to be stunningly protown in your few posts.

[SensFan]

If you actually want to meta me, I suggest reading the first few pages of Newbie 550, where I claimed to find a post scummy, then retracted that statement, for the sole purpose of fishing for reactions. In an ongoing Newb game, I did the same. In another game that I'm pretty sure is ongoing (I'm dead in it), I proxied my vote for the first 48 hours or so, again for reaction-fishing.

Long story made short, I was purposely ambiguous with calling my vote "non-random", intending to see who was overly eager to jump on my wagon afterwards with little to no reasoning. So far, Xtoxm and TM look sincere in their questions towards me, while I am far less sure of the motives of alvin and pojed.

FoS: pojed