In post 40, AGar wrote:Also, because their shit will be buried by plenty of inane shit (remember...50 players. POSTING.) and they'll have plenty of time to fabricate a cover for it when in a natural environment they would be called immediately. This is the problem with segmented scumhunting.
That you can't see the flaws in this idea is pretty saddening to me.
There are going to be lurkers. If we're looking in a group of 50, its easy to hide. In a group of 10, call out lurkers in that group. Of the other 40, I don't care if half of them aren't saying much when its not their group. They'll get their licks when their group is up.
I really think I'm the one being trolled here. I haven't heard one good answer that looks like there's been any thought put into why this isn't a good idea.