In post 10, Hoopla wrote:Alright, lets use the first two lynches to policy lynch. I'll switch to chesskid if we get redFF afterwards.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: chesskid
DEAL!
That is 8 of 10 needed.
In post 10, Hoopla wrote:Alright, lets use the first two lynches to policy lynch. I'll switch to chesskid if we get redFF afterwards.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: chesskid
In post 34, The Mini-Librarian wrote:k. I've just played a few mm games with him and haven't had any trouble so I just wanted to know why people didn't like him.
Anyway let's keep this going.
chesskid
p-edit: L-1
Please someone hammer before he gets in.
In post 38, syndromeofadown wrote:In post 34, The Mini-Librarian wrote:k. I've just played a few mm games with him and haven't had any trouble so I just wanted to know why people didn't like him.
Anyway let's keep this going.
VOTE: The Mini Librarian
Wait, so you don't know why people dislike him, in fact you never had any trouble with him, yet you want to quicklynch him before he gets a chance to post? Sounds pretty opportunistic to me.
In post 53, Hoopla wrote:Our strategy should be, everyone vote for whoever they want to lynch for whatever reason they care for. There is no point trying to organise a plan and have 50 people weigh in and agree/disagree and discuss a plan - even getting half to do that is a waste of time.
I am licking my lips at the prospect of wagon analysis with 10 lynch wagons. Making people vote from a set list when they don't want to devalues that. If scum want to try and vote in blocks to exert their influence, good luck to them, but we will pick them off. We have better chances of lynching scum, if a bunch of townies can spring from nowhere to nail an unsuspecting scumbag - it keeps scum on their toes and might force them to push other wagons harder or bus when one of them is under pressure.
In post 81, izakthegoomba wrote:Also,
FoS: Rhinox
I think FoS'ing will be useful here. Anyone feel like keeping a FoScount?
In post 95, Hoopla wrote:In post 94, Johhog wrote:You said that I looked "too serious". I'm saying that I'm very serious indeed.
The act of responding to an obvious joke in that manner kind of is. It's a typical sort of thing scum like to address early, because it gives the illusion of doing something.
In post 108, izakthegoomba wrote:In post 97, Johhog wrote:In post 86, izakthegoomba wrote:In post 85, Hoopla wrote:I'm actually legitimately suspicious of Johhog. Does anyone else feel similarly?
Why is that? I'm pretty null on him.
In post 96, izakthegoomba wrote:I see. Let's see how it goes, but I wouldn't mind Johhog as a late D1 lynch if we're short of other targets.
CANNOT COMPREHEND
UNVOTE: IceGuy
VOTE: izakthegoomba
...what is so bad about that?
In post 114, Hoopla wrote:Oh snap. There must be some Mimes on that wagon.
In post 149, MattP wrote:Vote: IceGuy
Freudian slip with the town/scum bs and then his last post was useless fluff; he could just look through the thread
In post 266, izakthegoomba wrote:
Policy or scum?
In post 685, TeChNoWC wrote:Ok, I am intrigued. How would the deathsquad work? How would it be any different from suspected townies working together and sifting through the other bullshit posters? Just because we immediately become a coalition, doesn't mean we will agree on everything. Does a coalition have a 'leader' of sorts that is like 'the towniest of townies?'
My concern in a big game is, there are potentially 10 scum right? Or at least close to. Or maybe even more. Which means it is easy for them to gang up on town, if they so desire. Lynches plus NKs and all hell breaks lose. I'm wondering how this coalition not only speeds up lynches (which isn't all that necessary really), but actually helps us make more educated decisions.
In post 689, T-Bone wrote:I really don't like lynching as quickly as possible. I'd still like to make informed lynches.
Nothing is perfect Techno.
I don't doubt it UN. The math doesn't lie.
I don't think so Fritz...it was my idea .
IT'S A TELL! LYNCH HIM!In post 697, TeChNoWC wrote:In post 691, redFF wrote:In post 653, TeChNoWC wrote:Inclined to think Milk might be a better lynch. Moneybags might not be giving reasons and seems to just be picking on randoms that give an appearance of scumminess, and seems like a pretty big non-contributor (plus yeah, buddying with BB is a concern), but Milk is behaving the same way. Gonna check the guys milk is after, but I swear it seems like a bussing tactic. He seems uber convinced Money is scum, and I could think of nothing better for a scum to do at this stage than lynch one of his buddies so he gets chucked in the town pool and forgotten.
In regards to the redFF issue, I think he is town because I have played with him as scum, and his playstyle is quite different. He is contributing a lot more in this game, and actually scumhunting. As scum he just defended himself and took shots at others.
what game was this?
We've only played one other game together, from memory. Ythan's game. I might have generalised a bit, but your style seems vastly different in this game.
I think I would be pretty good. You should check out Random Mafia 2. I was a 2 shot day vig. 50% of the shots were Mafia godfathers. Having a coalition following me would be like being a day vig.In post 701, Hoopla wrote:And Fritzler definitely shouldn't be the one running it.
In post 747, Elmo TeH AzN wrote:In post 616, mykonian wrote:2 lynches to go today.
MB is at L-1 Right?
In post 810, Muffin Wednesday wrote:Does Fritzler always play like he's playing? I feel like he was trying to look like a Mime before the Mimes died.
In post 824, Fritzler wrote:In post 810, Muffin Wednesday wrote:Does Fritzler always play like he's playing? I feel like he was trying to look like a Mime before the Mimes died.
Yes. You should probably read all of my games over the last 6 years.
In post 839, Amrun wrote:Why do you think Fritzler is scum?
Are you drunk? You seem drunk.
I actually think you both look pretty town, and we should lynch uber ninja. Of course, I like revenge voting people who vote me.In post 859, TeChNoWC wrote:
I can understand your aggression.
Amrun, stop being an arrogant prick. YOU are the one coming off scummy as fuck. incorrect wording while being haggled or voting anti-town isn't scummy, it's simply poor decision making at BEST. Vote jumping, riding one person over small elements of what they say, OMGUSing and lacking any credible scumhunting IS scummy.
In post 868, UberNinja wrote:It'll have to be tomorrow because I sure as hell don't have time for this today.
In post 882, UberNinja wrote:<3 imaginality and hoopla, glad somebody gets it.
a few questions before I begin:
1. why are both t-bone and fritzler omgus voting me? fritzler has admitted as much, but t-bone is trying to pretend to be town. ugh
2. what exactly do you expect me to contribute at this point? solid reads? anything other than slaphappy humor/semi-trolling? and why?
3. what do all of the lynches so far have in common? they were popular? they were because of scumminess? what's the link between?
i'll be back in a while with some thoughts. in the mean time, i would lynch t-bone in a heartbeat
but i think fritzler needs more pressure before anyone is lynched
In post 889, Mastermind of Sin wrote:Hmm, just noticed that you idiots have managed to kill off 8 town players so far. Good fucking job, lmfao...
In post 980, Ellibereth wrote:Trevor
is CONFIRMED TOWN
who is also now granted IMMORTALITY of shots.
That is true. I feel no reason to justify anything.In post 1935, manho wrote:In post 1899, Zajnet wrote:In post 1890, manho wrote:why is there so many people self-voting. it is almost always against your win con. you shouldn't be able to gain town-cred by self-voting.
but the sad truth is thatscums are much less likely to self-vote than town, so i think both kondi and lowman is town.
not true.
that's true in this specific game where it's 10 votes to lynch and people are happy wagoning everything.
In post 1766, Chevre wrote:
...
I realize that this is a lot of quotes, but I wanted to rationalize why I was voting Luffy.
i agree that this post is forceful and over-justifying. and this line is the worst. only scum need to rationalize his vote to this extent.
and he is providing useless information the whole game.
vote: Chevre
In post 1939, SpyreX wrote:Do NOT lynch Chevre. Especially before I finish this up. Ended up playing D3 until stupid in the morning, but I will get this done.