Mini 736 - The Masonry Game Over!

Nightfall · Post Post #75 (ISO) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:14 pm

Max makes an appearance and things go to hell, go figure

As for the Empking vs RF issue, I'm more on RF's side.
She brought up an idea and realizing it could possibly hurt the town more than aid it
moved on. She also gave a very reasonable explanation for why she said what she did.

On a side note... Sebguer, Anyone looking fishy to you right now?
And is Jesus blowing bubble gum?....

Nightfall · Post Post #76 (ISO) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:18 pm

rokovoj wrote:1. Lynch most liars.
2. We shouldn't be listing things for scum specifically not to do.
2. We shouldn't be listing things for scum specifically to do.
4. We shouldn't be listing things for scum specifically not to do.
5. This is not a newbie game.

This is way worse than what RF tried to do.
vote: alcove
.

2nd that.

FOS: Alcove

This also isn't a "normal" game either.

rokovoj · Post Post #77 (ISO) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:23 pm

Jesus has a word bubble.

Juls · Post Post #78 (ISO) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:25 pm

Nightfall wrote:
rokovoj wrote:1. Lynch most liars.
2. We shouldn't be listing things for scum specifically not to do.
2. We shouldn't be listing things for scum specifically to do.
4. We shouldn't be listing things for scum specifically not to do.
5. This is not a newbie game.

This is way worse than what RF tried to do.
vote: alcove
.
2nd that.

FOS: Alcove

3rd'd

Man up Nightfall! FoS pfft!

Unvote. Vote: alcove

Sebguer · Post Post #79 (ISO) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:33 pm

Nightfall wrote:Max makes an appearance and things go to hell, go figure

As for the Empking vs RF issue, I'm more on RF's side.
She brought up an idea and realizing it could possibly hurt the town more than aid it
moved on. She also gave a very reasonable explanation for why she said what she did.

On a side note... Sebguer, Anyone looking fishy to you right now?
And is Jesus blowing bubble gum?....

There's been about two posts thus far with any actual content... Alcove is a little odd here what-with the random questions, but it -can- be seen as simply an attempt to spark discussion, albeit done poorly.

Really, it's not scummy enough for a vote, but I'll

unvote

as we've left random voting.

Darox · Post Post #80 (ISO) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:33 pm

Votecount #2

alcove (3) - Caboose, rokovoj, Juls
Empking (1) - Max
zwetschenwasser (1) - RestFermata
RestFermata (1) - Empking
Caboose (1) - Nightfall
Nightfall (1) Reecer6
Max (1) - alcove
Sebguer (0)
Juls (0)
Reecer6 (0)
rokovoj (0)
skitzer (0)

Not Voting (3) - skitzer, zwetschenwasser, Sebguer

12 alive, 7 to lynch, 6 to no-lynch

Maybe this will be more obvious.

Sebguer · Post Post #81 (ISO) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:34 pm

Darox wrote:
Votecount #2

alcove (3) - Caboose, rokovoj, Juls
Empking (1) - Max
zwetschenwasser (1) - RestFermata
skitzer (1) - Sebguer
RestFermata (1) - Empking
Caboose (1) - Nightfall
Nightfall (1) Reecer6
Max (1) - alcove
Sebguer (0)
Juls (0)
Reecer6 (0)
rokovoj (0)

Not Voting (2) - skitzer, zwetschenwasser

12 alive, 7 to lynch, 6 to no-lynch

Maybe this will be more obvious.

Nice timing.

I don't know what you're talking about.

Sebguer · Post Post #82 (ISO) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:35 pm

Juls wrote:
Nightfall wrote:
rokovoj wrote:1. Lynch most liars.
2. We shouldn't be listing things for scum specifically not to do.
2. We shouldn't be listing things for scum specifically to do.
4. We shouldn't be listing things for scum specifically not to do.
5. This is not a newbie game.

This is way worse than what RF tried to do.
vote: alcove
.
2nd that.

FOS: Alcove

3rd'd

Man up Nightfall! FoS pfft!

Unvote. Vote: alcove

In a rush to lynch someone? Do you have any particularly good reason, aside from the already-stated accusations?

Juls · Post Post #83 (ISO) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:37 pm

Sebguer wrote:the already-stated accusations

this

Sebguer · Post Post #84 (ISO) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:39 pm

Juls wrote:
Sebguer wrote:the already-stated accusations
this

Do you really think a single post is enough to lynch him? I mean, it was suspicious, but you seem extraordinarily anxious for people to LYNCH LYNCH LYNCH.

Juls · Post Post #85 (ISO) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:42 pm

I'm sorry, does this game require only my vote to lynch? That's a new one on me. In fact, I put him at L-4. You seem to be the only one concerned with lynching.

alcove · Post Post #86 (ISO) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:44 pm

rokovoj wrote:1. Lynch most liars.
2. We shouldn't be listing things for scum specifically not to do.
2. We shouldn't be listing things for scum specifically to do.
4. We shouldn't be listing things for scum specifically not to do.
5. This is not a newbie game.

This is way worse than what RF tried to do.
vote: alcove
.

Eh. Sorry.

Sebguer · Post Post #87 (ISO) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:44 pm

Juls wrote:I'm sorry, does this game require only my vote to lynch? That's a new one on me. In fact, I put him at L-4. You seem to be the only one concerned with lynching.

I'm not speaking about your vote, though it was 3rd on the wagon...

However, Night put up a FoS and you berated him for not throwing up a vote.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #88 (ISO) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:45 pm

What was the point of question 5, alcove?

alcove · Post Post #89 (ISO) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:48 pm

zwetschenwasser wrote:What was the point of question 5, alcove?

I didn't know whether my questions would be helpful for moving discussion along or not, so I asked whether you thought they would if anyone had better ones to suggest.

I'm aware the questions were not the best conversation starters ever, but they were better than what we had going. And they did spark

something

, so...

I did not consider that some of them might give scum useful information, and for that I apologize. My bad.

Juls · Post Post #90 (ISO) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:48 pm

Lighten up? It was a joke.

alcove · Post Post #91 (ISO) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:49 pm

EBWOP:

so I asked whether you thought they would, and if anyone had better ones to suggest.

Caboose · Post Post #92 (ISO) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:49 pm

Sebguer wrote:
Juls wrote:
Nightfall wrote:
rokovoj wrote:1. Lynch most liars.
2. We shouldn't be listing things for scum specifically not to do.
2. We shouldn't be listing things for scum specifically to do.
4. We shouldn't be listing things for scum specifically not to do.
5. This is not a newbie game.

This is way worse than what RF tried to do.
vote: alcove
.
2nd that.

FOS: Alcove

3rd'd

Man up Nightfall! FoS pfft!

Unvote. Vote: alcove
In a rush to lynch someone? Do you have any particularly good reason, aside from the already-stated accusations?

Since when does voting for someone indicate a rush to lynch?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #93 (ISO) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:49 pm

Fo' shizzle!

Sebguer · Post Post #94 (ISO) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:52 pm

Juls wrote:Lighten up? It was a joke.

Sorry, didn't seem like one.

Anyways, this thread is still relatively devoid of content and I think I broke my n key.

Caboose: As I said, it wasn't the vote, it was the words to Night which I (apparently) mistakenly took seriously.

alcove · Post Post #95 (ISO) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:56 pm

Anyways, this thread is still relatively devoid of content and I think I broke my n key.

Well, my d key has been broken for months. I've gotten used to pressing the pressure-sensitive little circle instead of a nice, clicky key.

Nightfall · Post Post #96 (ISO) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 3:02 pm

I took it the same as Sebguer when I read it. Had I voted he'd be at 4 votes.
And with this crowd (No offence) I can see us getting real close to an accidental lynch / speed lynch.

Juls · Post Post #97 (ISO) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 3:05 pm

Really? "Man up" and "Pfft" are phrases that convey seriousness?

Sebguer · Post Post #98 (ISO) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 3:17 pm

Juls wrote:Really? "Man up" and "Pfft" are phrases that convey seriousness?

My laptop's dying and I've got to drive home now, back in an hour, but yes.

Maybe it's my 1 hour of sleep in the last 30, but the way you said it did not convey joviality.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #99 (ISO) » Wed Jan 28, 2009 3:21 pm

PRUFT