Krazy! I'm not sure if you realized, Nacho, that you were the hammer vote, but that's not cool in my eyes. Last we heard from you, you said this :
I'm not sure about the Raider case, but I'm going to look over peanut's/GC's cases and ISO Raider, and come back with an actual opinion on this.
Let's fast forward three days, and you come back with this :
Vote: Raider
I believed his vig claim pretty much completely at first. That is, until I saw post 424. And 427. And 433...
All you posted is that you believed his claim (what? when did you say that? until his final posts, without justification. Lazy, first of all, because you hammer with very little supporting arguments (rather vague ones), which could provide you with leeway to change your reasoning later on if necessary. Likely to also play the "I didn't realize it was the hammer" card.
I know this is based on Raider being town, because, let's be honest, odds are, early on, that the town mislynches. But, in the event that Raider is scum, I still suspect you for dropping such an out-of-nowhere, non-chalant hammer, trying to earn "town points" without really contributing to the town.
HOS : Raider