In post 239, MaguaofIllusion wrote:Glork– why would you bother to care who Dramonic wants you sheep?
Because dramonic is the name I arbitrarily ("randomly" to most) picked out before I started reading the thread.
In post 239, MaguaofIllusion wrote:Glork– why would you bother to care who Dramonic wants you sheep?
In post 250, Glork wrote:In post 239, MaguaofIllusion wrote:Glork– why would you bother to care who Dramonic wants you sheep?
Because dramonic is the name I arbitrarily ("randomly" to most) picked out before I started reading the thread.
Spyrex – given the scum wincon why should Post 139 not be met with immediate rope?
In post 208, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Tammy (L-7) ~ SpyreX, Magister Ludi, UberNinja, Debonair Danny DiPietro, dramonic, Oman, Glork, [Hippos]
No way this wagon doesn't have... let's arbitrarily say 2 scum on it.
I'm gonna go reread everyone's joining the wagon, and see where my vote needs to go.
In post 251, Glork wrote:Also,
Tierce's complete and utter confusion over flavor / win conditions is very likely genuine, as I'd expect her to tighten up the flavor screws before the game started if she were scum. Please move your vote somewhere more useful. Hell, I'd rather it be onmethan Tierce at this point.
In post 209, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:I'm fine with accepting the Oversoul vote as a RVS vote, but the timing and manor of you explaining it in your third post is a little off. Why do you feel the need to defend your RVS vote?
In post 209, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Then, your Tammy vote. I'm pretty sure this is a blatant misrepresentation. Sure, maybe Tammy didn't word her post particularly well, but I was able to parse it into something that makes a hell of a lot more sense than what you described it as.
In post 209, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:It seems a lot to me like you were reaching for the conclusion you drew in your second post. Would you mind outlining how exactly you came to this conclusion?
My statement still stands and it will stand forever: saying they are looking for someone doesn't bother me. I wish that if that was the route they were going for (in all scenarios in which they're assuming who they are looking for isn't ALSO looking for them) they'd have either kept quiet OR just rolled the hard eight and said who it was. The middle ground doesn't help near as well.
Ehh this claiming doesn't bother me in the intrinsic sense. Although if they're gonna go for it I'd almost rather them go whole hog.
In post 251, Glork wrote:Tierce's complete and utter confusion over flavor / win conditions is very likely genuine, as I'd expect her to tighten up the flavor screws before the game started if she were scum. Please move your vote somewhere more useful. Hell, I'd rather it be on me than Tierce at this point.
Waiiit now I'm having a lapse.
Roles and not PLAYERS?
In post 59, Magister Ludi wrote:Thats an incredibly weak and inept reason to seriously vote someone, Uberninja. Do you honestly think that mispelling a word and blaming it on your phone is a scumtell?
In post 106, Quilford wrote:In post 43, Zdenek wrote:Quilford, explain your reads on mathgirl in this game and Lewacher in Animal Rescue.
okay so
mathgirl was nullscum because of the phrasing "not very town" (yes, most of the reads in that post were based off very small gut feelings)
and lewarcher in animal rescue (i have no idea why you're asking, i want an explanation) was town in my early reads post in that game because of his comment about llamas (:P) then vi raised good pointsTM against him and i went along with that, then his claim made me agonise and i ended up not being on his lynch.
~~
i think tammy is pretty okay for now tbh
In post 111, dramonic wrote:Zdenek: Bitter much?
In post 165, Hinduragi wrote:Oh man, another game of a bunch of backwards words thrown around. The joy of this. Tierce wagon: lol. Tammy wagon: . Saw bitchy and smarmy a lot while skimming. It's the better of the wagons we have for a d1 lynch but I think a golden opportunity will show up in time.
In post 176, Tammy wrote:Going back on principles and helping you all out because fuck it...vote: Tammy
In post 221, dramonic wrote:LLD, of all the things to attack in UN's play, I'm surprised you're not mentionning the fact he JUST screamed "TAMMY IS TOWN GAIS" while having a vote sitting on her <_<
UN, you have to either bus or buddy tammy, you can't do both at once that's way too obvious man!
In post 260, MaguaofIllusion wrote:In post 251, Glork wrote:Tierce's complete and utter confusion over flavor / win conditions is very likely genuine, as I'd expect her to tighten up the flavor screws before the game started if she were scum. Please move your vote somewhere more useful. Hell, I'd rather it be on me than Tierce at this point.
Well I read all 10 pages over an hour period while taking notes. With that in mind ... can you link me to the post where Tierce shows ignorance of the Wincon? I have little time to dredge her ISO at the current time. Thanks!
In post 255, Hinduragi wrote:In post 251, Glork wrote:Also,
Tierce's complete and utter confusion over flavor / win conditions is very likely genuine, as I'd expect her to tighten up the flavor screws before the game started if she were scum. Please move your vote somewhere more useful. Hell, I'd rather it be onmethan Tierce at this point.
At what point before you unvoted did you figure this out? The uptake was pretty late.
In post 252, singersigner wrote:In post 250, Glork wrote:In post 239, MaguaofIllusion wrote:Glork– why would you bother to care who Dramonic wants you sheep?
Because dramonic is the name I arbitrarily ("randomly" to most) picked out before I started reading the thread.
Do you usually do that? And then on top of that, do you usually listen to the aforementioned person?
Tierce wrote:Yeah, I was thinking about it, and it's not the fact that it's uN that's being wagoned--it's the fact that Glork has had enough experience with UN to know better. I've seen Glorktown act like this, but... he should know already. His softclaim looked townish, but this is rather odd. FOS: Glork