Mod
: If a hypothetical Sane Cop were to investigate the Jester, would they get a guilty, innocent, or some other result?1.)
Obviously the jester claiming today is not the best for the jester – but it is
the best move for the town. It was rather annoying to see so many players arguing against this plan. It only takes one
extra step to get from "Wait a second, that's not a smart thing for Jester to do" to the surprising conclusion of "And wait another second - but it is
a good thing for the town".2.)
For some reason, Post 112 by Captain Bandwagon rubbed me the wrong way (and I find it strange myself considering the plethora of votes on Greasy Spot). Sketching out my general reaction would be something like this:->
a.)
No indication of whether Captain Bandwagon finds Greasy Spot scummy
at this point in time as opposed to 'granting a request'->
b.)
Clearly cannot be a 'pressure' vote for more information when it is done directly and solely from a quote of somebody asking to be voted/lynched->
c.)
Considering Captain Bandwagon's initial reaction to the "Jester claim Day One" strategy was to argue against it, and his own claim of "I totally know where you're coming from" in [157], I find it difficult to believe he used the fact that Greasy Spot argued against it as a justification for his vote – so if
there was a basis, it would have to be something elseI completely realize there were votes from other people who
also
did not explain their vote, but this one gave me a different vibe from the others. Later CB claims it was "his [Greasy Spot's] actions" that led CB to think GS was scum in Post 172. So I'm going to ask: what actions in particular were you basing your vote off?{Coming back}: Looks like it's the sarcastic posts that got Captain B (mentioned in Post 249). That mollifies me somewhat, but I might as well get a fuller explanation.
3.)
Post 192 from Dani Banani is highly ironic. It features a chastisement of tyhess for 'not doing research' while subsequently asking why tyhess is not voting who he finds to be suspicious (while tyhess was, in fact, doing just that). Not particularly
scummy, but difficult to pass by.4.)
In Post 230 from Battle Mage, I get a "play-both-sides-of-the-fence" feel. He doesn't like the logic for Jester coming out on Day One, but the only person he mentions as being suspicious for this is mith. At the same time, he doesn't like Dani Bananis' "interaction with the GS wagon" (which – to me -- seemed like Dani Banani expressing sympathy with GS), and he says that post [182] (where I unvote) "smells terrible". I get the impression that he is claiming to not like the wagon on GS (confirmed in Post 242), but at the same time seems to say that he doesn't want me to have unvoted him and does not want Dani Banani to be lenient as Dani had been in a similar situation as town before. Could I have some elaboration on this? If I am misunderstanding you, please correct me. Has your view changed on this since you have made that post?
5.)
Something about MoS's posts bugs me. I kinda feel like he's just been some random person who walks in the room to say stuff like:*shrug*Person Walking in a Room Full of Talking People wrote:Did you know the average chocolate bar has anywhere between three to eight bug legs in it?
No
, I didn't know that until I made it a point to find a silly example to use here. The feeling is mostly a vibe, but that's the best way I can think to describe it.6.)
When didCaptain Bandwagon wrote:I can't believe you didn't see it, hence my frustration.
you
realize the Jester plan was a trap? Your posts have certainly given me reason to doubt you 'knew all along'.~~~~~
However.
Vote: wolfcrier
. How's it going, scum?
