Claus wrote:
DP - Obfuscates his posts with poetry. Started an attack against RoN based on meta, and kept pushing it without RoN's response. Started discussing RoN with other people who were defending him. When Spring attacks him for his case, he starts OMGUS her. I don't see her dodging his questions as he says. I don't find him that scummy, though.
This is not exactly true,
I caught Ranger in a lie or a playstyle change and took the cue.
In another game he random voted without care.
I wanted to know why he started this game with such a reversal declare.
Once he posted that he needed a replacement.
I figured it wasn’t a playstyle change, but a lack of interest, and I removed my vote placement.
As for spring she still has refused to answer my questions.
springlullaby wrote:
What I know for certain is, I happen to use meta extensively when I'm scum to make myself look good, and to
pull craplogic on people
.
Drunken Piper wrote:Please explain what was
crap about my "case"?
please back up your suggestions.
Did you meta Ranger to see if my observation was really crap?
If you have answered these questions, provide the post number(s), there chap.
If I have missed the answers, I will admit I am wrong.
But I don’t see them in the thread, and I didn’t rush along.
Claus wrote:
Spring, DP, RW: What do you think of Alabaska, and the attacks against him?
You are right, I have tunnel visioned on Spring for I found his play lacking,
But I guess review of other player’s I have been slacking.
Ala has not really done anything and has pinged my radar little.
However, after rereading the game a bit, he does come across non committal.
Lately however, I believe that Ala has provided stances.
That could be because of the pressure, he dares to now take chances.
I think his follower mentality should be watched more.
An example of this is his following of Claus in post 184.
However, I find him less scummy though than someone like Dean.
Who has constantly lurked, and stays behind the scenes.
I do feel good about Claus, who has provided good, solid, and steadfast content.
He takes a stance on conversations, and is not a follower 100%.
ooba wrote:
DP 61:
I've read the bolded parts but it still seems to me as if RoTN was only against random voting if it starts with a day
Did you meta Ranger when he made the thought?
You would find my random voting (after day start) with glee, but I guess this is all for naught.
So please explain how I was incorrect.
and why didnt you check my meta, please interject.
ooba wrote:
Bang Bang Bang - a contradiction from Al ...
Al in Post 64 wrote:Ah. I see. I read that part as the was drivel because there was no one nightkilled and therefore nothing to talk about at the beginning of day 1. My apologies.
@Drunken Piper:
Yeah I meta'd him
, and I do think this stance on random voting is odd, as he random voted in others games. I just wasn't sure random voting is what he was ranting about. Also, kudos on the rhyme.
This was a good catch, in your read trekking.
But it DOES sound like a joke especially following RW’s post and the ending “just checking”
The only thing I find scummy about Alab, with that being said.
Is his tendency to follow and to be lead.
Ala, I would like you to post your thoughts on each and every one.
Who do you think is scummy, and what have they done.
What a happened to Ranger? It's like he transformed into another person.
