Lloyd wrote:Unvote
Vote: Flameaxe
The camel already was needing spinal surgery...
On Sat Mar 15, 2008 11:54 am, Albert B. Rampage wrote:I will destroy your entire argument in a single sentence:farside22 wrote:If you are going to argue about someone's lynch and have reason that is one thing, but to place a vote without reason is scummie. Giving people a reason they didn't state when they voted is based on nothing but at name is bad. They should have there own opinon and state them or they can lie and use what ever logic you just stated as there own. Giving people a free pass to vote without reason should be noted.
"Its not what you can prove, its what you KNOW."
That'sthe difference between this game and every other game you've played so far.
On Sat Mar 15, 2008 11:55 am, DrippingGoofball wrote:That post made no sense at all. I suspect obfuscating scum.Miztef wrote:... What are you even talking about? I suppose the previous post, but I'd prefer more eleboration.
Fishing for Masons much? I happen to value Albert's opinion, dynamism, and decisiveness.Miztef wrote:Why are stating things such as "who should we lynch today, albert?" why are you inclined to listen to him? Or are you being sarcastic?
Hey Albert I wouldn't mind lynching Miztef, too.
Samruc, who were you agreeing with? Albert, DGB, or both?On Sat Mar 15, 2008 12:11 pm, Samruc wrote:^ Good post
Miztef wrote:-Blazerunner = 3 posts, decent amount of contribution average
-DGB = 8 posts, most with near 0 contribution average
-Max = 6 posts, decent about of content average
-Ooba = 6 posts, almost 0 contribution average
-samruc = 5 posts, low contribution average
-Sarcastro = 7 posts, decent amount of contribution average
-Flameaxe = 4 posts, low contribution average
Blazerunner = I agree with both of youGuardian wrote:blaze, good c.
dgb, i disagree, i think she has good c, helped lynch scum iirc.
max, good c.
ooba, more post, helped lynch scum.
samruc, about as bad as flameaxe.
sarcastro, decent c.
flameaxe, by far the worst.
Boo, I already pointed out the SK for you... And then I happened to be away for one day. I'm not arguing with the speedlynching tactic, it's obviously working, but we can't just lynch anyone who's gone for one day...Guardian wrote:samruc, about as bad as flameaxe
Lloyd wrote:It's odd that you would ask for opinions on game mechanics theory, reference the last game, yet discount the key difference between the two games.
Albert B. Rampage in his 2nd post of the game wrote:I'll also say that both the masons and mafia (barring myself) were extremely conservative last game. We can't play that way here, lest the SK kills accumulate. I think a good starting point would be to determine how fast we should bandwagon. I believe that in the original run of this setup, at least one of my partners were lynched before being able to make a kill.
QFT. Some people are busy and I think Lloyds comment to flameaxe looks like a desperate attempt to get himself out of the spotlightAlbert B. Rampage wrote:I don't agree to lynching players with low content.
I see.farside22 wrote:Post 225 you were already voting for Lloyd.armlx wrote:I agree with the anti-Lloyd sympathizers. He was indeed towards the top of my list of 8 for me.
Unvote, Vote Lloyd