1) I could have sworn it was UA that said something about submitting a kingmaker who was a hero... If I have time later I'll look back over Day 2 /sigh.
2)
belgarion wrote:
Twomz, do you have any questions for me specificly or do you just speculate? Also, any comments on your "living dead" state?
It's probably nothing really... when I saw the "pair of pants" SK and started thinking about it I looked into your posting record... saw that this is really the only game you've ever been in, and that you didn't /in in the signup thread, just appeared a little ways down... and assumed it was similar to Pheobus/Blind Pheonix from Mafiascum mafia mafia (
link). But after I looked closer, Aimee got replaced and you kept on posting... which wouldn't make sense if you were her. And you joined in June, which was a while before design roles went through.
In all honesty, I got my hopes up, but then when I went back to check I realized that it was very unlikely, so there is really nothing for you to worry about.
And I'm not living dead, I'm alive. Game kinda got dumped on a large workload though, I had just enough games going... /sigh.
3)
UA wrote:Belg - In Kingmaker, the Kingmaker can be either Scum or Town. I'm not saying he's scum or town, I'm saying he's lying
This is false. The kingmaker was town. The KING could be either town or scum. That's the reason it was so important the kingmaker was paying attention and wasn't a complete twit, because they had to a) chose a protown player and b) chose someone who would make a good decision.
4) While it is true that "king for a day" does sound in line with the whole "ren faire" thing, it wouldn't matter because not enough people bought tickets. I'd still prefer if Thyroid said what his role actually did instead of skirting around the subject.
5) BTW, speaking of thyroid, that's who I protected N1. I figured since he spouting off about his special ability all day, someone was going to try to take a shot at him... and I guess I was right (unless both killing groups targeted me... and if so, you bastards).
"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith