There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
In post 1368, ConManMick wrote:You know, it occurs to me that, technically, psyche's poll on who should get to keep their April Fool's titles is the equivalent of people actually voting for those titles. You could argue that everyone who gets at least five votes, then, should have their title reviewed as per usual and approved or rejected as appropriate. Whadya think?
if we take the analogy too far, i should reject the titles i think are mediocre, which i think are
nearly
all of them
I think he was a actually correct with saying nearly all of them are mediocre.
The ones that aren't are because they're below mediocrity.
Holder of the Longest Continuous Weekly Mafiascum Post Record. 1 July 2012 - 16 Feb 2023
*It may be held by someone else if you discount the major downtime in 2012 and 2014, I'm not doing the research.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
It's like we get it, you're lesbian, ya know? We have a ton of LGBT members on site but I wouldn't define any of them by their sexuality. Nati is a great person and I'm sure there is a more clever way to describe her than "that weeb lesbian".
I kinda feel the same way about the 50 shades of GreyICE title. Where it's like, yo, this site has a ton of people into bdsm on site (i.e "enjoi rope" is an actual meme here) so I don't get why grey needs it to define him, especially given that's he's so polarizing. I get it's a joke/reference but idk man.
eh, I don't feel a title should define you. zoraster isn't defined by the fact that he screwed up assassins in the palace that one time, for instance. It's something distinctive about the user.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
In post 1385, Accountant wrote:eh, I don't feel a title should define you. zoraster isn't defined by the fact that he screwed up assassins in the palace that one time, for instance. It's something distinctive about the user.
"That weeb lesbian" is also probably not a distinctive descriptor.
Idk, man, I'm just 1 man with 1 opinion. Psyche has the say.
Edit: zoraster is definitely defined by being a screw up. "Ignorant motherfucker" I believe was once used to describe him,
To give my personal take on this, I voted for Lily Leanan because of its faerie implications. I feel like Nati's association with faeries is distinctive and an interesting part of her, even moreso than her "weebness" or sexuality.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
THIS POST IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.
how can davstos puns be real if our eyes arent real
THIS POST IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.
In post 1368, ConManMick wrote:You know, it occurs to me that, technically, psyche's poll on who should get to keep their April Fool's titles is the equivalent of people actually voting for those titles. You could argue that everyone who gets at least five votes, then, should have their title reviewed as per usual and approved or rejected as appropriate. Whadya think?
if we take the analogy too far, i should reject the titles i think are mediocre, which i think are
nearly
all of them
My title is fucking great, how dare you
Xalxe: this is xofelf sometimes we call each other names and other times we share emotions
MattyP: Ur an enigma tho when it comes to circadian rhythm and the traditions we hold dear when it comes to the sun and the moon Get to reknow a xofelf here
Discord is faster than PMs or sitechat: xofelf#1697
