Dance of the Title Fairy: Accepting Applications

[vonflare]

yeah independents don't make sense.

I still think 5 electors per faction for 25 total is the best route

[Not_Mafia]

Titles are social, mods shouldn't be the biggest faction, shitposters and social fixtures should be, I still think my original proposal is the correct balance

[vonflare]

would psyche be in mods or social fixtures?

[Not_Mafia]

For title purposes, mod

[Who]

I think the entire concept of an electoral college is a bad idea, just let the people self-regulate.

[Psyche]

let everyone choose their own title!

[vonflare]

hmmm you might be on to something psyche

[Who]

No that's a terrible system.

[fferyllt]

How many more votes does Nati's title need to be considered?

[Vijarada]

What if you mainly shitpost in mish mash?

[Annadog40]

Could also divide users instead by year they joined. Would be more simple.

[vonflare]

Could also divide users instead by year they joined. Would be more simple.

But I'd be in different groups depending on your time zone

[Kublai Khan]

let everyone choose their own title!

No, we need to go the opposite direction. We need to bring back the Title Fairy attitudes of old. The ones who didn't go out of their way to create elaborate tiered discussion and waiting periods or encourage a lot of input from scummers to appease or keep popularity

We need a Title Fairy who will rule with an iron fist and is the sole arbiter who what makes a good title or not.

[Annadog40]

We could just exclude you, or figure out the forum time. Cause forums have a time zone they are set in.

[vonflare]

I want to be in my own group

[Annadog40]

We'll put you in the non-voting group.

[-Grey-]

We'll put you in the non-posting group.

FTFY

[Annadog40]

tree stumps are cool.

[ConManMick]

You know, it occurs to me that, technically, psyche's poll on who should get to keep their April Fool's titles is the equivalent of people actually voting for those titles. You could argue that everyone who gets at least five votes, then, should have their title reviewed as per usual and approved or rejected as appropriate. Whadya think?

[-Grey-]

No, because people have been actively campaigning for votes which goes against the process.

[Not Chara]

there's also that the titles were devised by the players themselves. the process is already deviated from at the start.

[Psyche]

You know, it occurs to me that, technically, psyche's poll on who should get to keep their April Fool's titles is the equivalent of people actually voting for those titles. You could argue that everyone who gets at least five votes, then, should have their title reviewed as per usual and approved or rejected as appropriate. Whadya think?

if we take the analogy too far, i should reject the titles i think are mediocre, which i think are nearly all of them

[Kublai Khan]

You know, it occurs to me that, technically, psyche's poll on who should get to keep their April Fool's titles is the equivalent of people actually voting for those titles. You could argue that everyone who gets at least five votes, then, should have their title reviewed as per usual and approved or rejected as appropriate. Whadya think?

if we take the analogy too far, i should reject the titles i think are mediocre, which i think are

nearly

all of them

[Psyche]

i gotta be nice

[-Grey-]

Pah.

My title was awesome.