Answer 1) It is entirely plausible that you were sincere, but is it also equally plausible that you were not. 50 50 chance.Adele wrote:Question 1) Isn't it entirely plausible that I was sincere in believing that the first subgame should be treated as an information collecting time - and, in fact, didn't I make my case for this prior to the events referred to above?
Question 2) How would I, subgame town, have even known who was in the subscum?
Question 3) Doesn't this theory assume that SomeStrangeSimenon or WaterboyWaldo is co-meta-scum with me, since it'd have to be one of the subscum and DGB's dead and innocent? - Seems to me that that's an assumption worth remembering for posterity.
3a) why did it fall to me to point out the above association, kab?
Answer 2) This one is harder to explain. I can't say for sure yet, but I could see it possible to set up scenarios with your metascum to somehow let the other metas know their alignment and such. Very far out there, I know, but I've seen weirdo breadcrumbs.
Answer 3)You ruined it for me! I was watching them carefully to see who reacted to what with you! This was more of what my plan hinged on, but no one has been posting too much... I was almost as concerned with checking out those two than I was with killing you! And that is also the answer to your bitchy
question number 3a. Group hug?
