Open 56 - Masons and Monks (GAME OVER) before 542

thinktank · Post Post #175 (ISO) » Sat Dec 22, 2007 6:27 am

*lynchee

farside22 · Post Post #176 (ISO) » Sat Dec 22, 2007 6:55 am

I'm sorry if that came of as hypocritical however I did not feel like I was ganging up on Oman. I criticized the wagon due to their reasons for voting oman but that didn't make him any less scummy in my opinion. He could very well be scum. My point was that his wagon was building at a stupendous rate based on what i thought was loose evidence which is why i FoSed everyone on it. My point is not "don't vote Oman", my point is yes he has acted scummy but we need to wait a bit before we have atleast a 9.5/10 on the scum meter because a speed lynch is never good for the town unless there is a 100% guarantee that the lynchess is scum.

You did comment to bandwagon Flameaxe and then FOS everyone who did a bandwagon on Oman. You can't really joke around and say to everyone else to stop joking around. Just my two cents.

Oman wrote:
Where would you put LutenitPowwel?

Even though this post is put towards Kabenon007, I'll answer it!

Probably in the eyes of everyone else, I'd be a 6/10

I have said some things that sounded scummy, and some other scummy things too (wow great specification, Lutenit).

Cute, but really unnecessary. Shouldn't you be trying to figure out who is scum at this point LutenitPowwel?

MORE OMAN AND KABENON VOTES

I'll settle for Flameaxe and thinktank after that piss-poor distancing attempt, though

I agree with Oman and Kabenon. Oman's arguement with you about the whole Kabenon thing was really weak. Kabenon's too townie comment still just won't go away no matter how hard he tries to talk it away. I don't know enough about either player, but I doubt they are partners. Most games I played partners usually stay away from each other not try and protect them. They could be scum's on different sides of the fence. I'm leaning more towards Kabenon at this point then Oman.

Oman · Post Post #177 (ISO) » Sat Dec 22, 2007 7:06 am

One thing In Kabenon's favour was that he stuck to too townie even after a large number vocally said it was not pro-town. If he was scum I'd see him withdrawing his statement immediatly.

Flameaxe · Post Post #178 (ISO) » Sat Dec 22, 2007 7:50 am

JDodge wrote:MORE OMAN AND KABENON VOTES

I'll settle for Flameaxe and thinktank after that piss-poor distancing attempt, though

Don't be silly, thinktank is scum.

LutenitPowwel · Post Post #179 (ISO) » Sat Dec 22, 2007 8:08 am

Oman wrote:Completly invalid. I don't know why you bothered.

I want to know people's opinions about my scumminess. I have practically no idea where people stand, so I'd like to know so I can change my ways.

LutenitPowwel · Post Post #180 (ISO) » Sat Dec 22, 2007 8:25 am

Mod: I'l be out from Monday to Thursday, so don't prod.

thinktank · Post Post #181 (ISO) » Sat Dec 22, 2007 9:58 am

Flameaxe wrote:
JDodge wrote:MORE OMAN AND KABENON VOTES

I'll settle for Flameaxe and thinktank after that piss-poor distancing attempt, though
Don't be silly, thinktank is scum.

you still haven't presented a case against me Flameaxe. Once you do I will respond with the best of my ability. You've just left it open to interpretation. You haven't presented any arguments against me only supposed arguments, presenting your arguments is protown. Its antitown to just sit there and hope that someone will stumble across information. Debating with you is more frustrating than anything else because I don't even understand what it is we're arguing about.

Flameaxe · Post Post #182 (ISO) » Sat Dec 22, 2007 10:07 am

thinktank wrote:
Flameaxe wrote:
JDodge wrote:MORE OMAN AND KABENON VOTES

I'll settle for Flameaxe and thinktank after that piss-poor distancing attempt, though
Don't be silly, thinktank is scum.
you still haven't presented a case against me Flameaxe. Once you do I will respond with the best of my ability. You've just left it open to interpretation. You haven't presented any arguments against me only supposed arguments, presenting your arguments is protown. Its antitown to just sit there and hope that someone will stumble across information. Debating with you is more frustrating than anything else because I don't even understand what it is we're arguing about.

It's anti-town being scum and all. We should kill him already.

thinktank · Post Post #183 (ISO) » Sat Dec 22, 2007 11:04 am

I'm starting to think you dont even have an argument because I've asked you numerous times what your argument is but you keep deferring. "We should kill him already". Based on What? You have given NO support for your argument that you think I am scum. I don't take your comments seriously any more because they don't hold any weight. They are a waste of space and I'm sorry that I've wasted these last few days considering what your posts are saying when they aren't really saying anything at all.

Flameaxe · Post Post #184 (ISO) » Sat Dec 22, 2007 11:09 am

thinktank wrote:I'm starting to think you dont even have an argument because I've asked you numerous times what your argument is but you keep deferring. "We should kill him already". Based on What? You have given NO support for your argument that you think I am scum. I don't take your comments seriously any more because they don't hold any weight. They are a waste of space and I'm sorry that I've wasted these last few days considering what your posts are saying when they aren't really saying anything at all.

Stop being scum and/or alive.

kabenon007 · Post Post #185 (ISO) » Sat Dec 22, 2007 8:59 pm

LP is at around almost slightly underneath an 8.

kuribo · Post Post #186 (ISO) » Sun Dec 23, 2007 2:26 am

kabenon007 wrote:LP is at around almost slightly underneath an 8.

Am I the only one that doesn't find this arbitrary scale-of-one-to-ten helpful?

Also, Kabenon and Oman may not be partners (I doubt they are) but let's not forget that we have two, two, TWO scumgroups for the price of one. (If we call now maybe they'll send us a third scumgroup... ABSOLUTELY FREE!) Scumgroups not available in stores.

kabenon007 · Post Post #187 (ISO) » Sun Dec 23, 2007 9:35 am

Well, I don't like assigning a number to a person's scum factor, especially cuz they change so often. But in good faith I did so. Don't like it, but did it anyway.

Oman · Post Post #188 (ISO) » Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:54 am

Flameaxe wrote:It's anti-town being scum and all. We should kill him already.

You know, without the avatar I almost thought this was Jdodge. I doubt you could mimic the genius, so posting your case, or pointing me to where you posted it earlier does help.

kuribo · Post Post #189 (ISO) » Sun Dec 23, 2007 2:26 pm

kabenon007 wrote:Well, I don't like assigning a number to a person's scum factor, especially cuz they change so often. But in good faith I did so. Don't like it, but did it anyway.

I never did like it when people act like they were "pushed" into doing things they didn't want to do.

kabenon007 · Post Post #190 (ISO) » Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:37 pm

Forgive me if I don't give the previous post any credit whatsoever, as you wouldn't like anything I do.

kuribo · Post Post #191 (ISO) » Tue Dec 25, 2007 1:39 am

kabenon007 wrote:Forgive me if I don't give the previous post any credit whatsoever, as you wouldn't like anything I do.

Not entirely true. I'd like it if you'd not be scum.

JDodge · Post Post #192 (ISO) » Tue Dec 25, 2007 3:02 am

Oman wrote:
Flameaxe wrote:It's anti-town being scum and all. We should kill him already.
You know, without the avatar I almost thought this was Jdodge. I doubt you could mimic the genius, so posting your case, or pointing me to where you posted it earlier does help.

double-standards are scummy

especially when there is a meta for not posting reasons for

both

of us

kabenon007 · Post Post #193 (ISO) » Tue Dec 25, 2007 9:27 am

Why would you like it if I wouldn't be scum? That would make me townie, and that would mean you are pushing the lynch of a townie... got something to confess?

Oman · Post Post #194 (ISO) » Tue Dec 25, 2007 12:28 pm

Yeah JD, but I've given up trying to get you to post reasons, I figured I might be able to change his mind.

kabenon wrote:Why would you like it if I wouldn't be scum? That would make me townie, and that would mean you are pushing the lynch of a townie... got something to confess?

epic phail.

TylerJ · Post Post #195 (ISO) » Tue Dec 25, 2007 2:42 pm

been absent... holidays... I read up but Im to tired to understand. Will post tommorow.

Also note that I will be gone th3 27-30.

JDodge · Post Post #196 (ISO) » Tue Dec 25, 2007 2:50 pm

Oman wrote:Yeah JD, but I've given up trying to get you to post reasons, I figured I might be able to change his mind.

kabenon wrote:Why would you like it if I wouldn't be scum? That would make me townie, and that would mean you are pushing the lynch of a townie... got something to confess?
epic phail.

So essentially you're going after someone you perceive to be an easy target?

Oman · Post Post #197 (ISO) » Tue Dec 25, 2007 4:17 pm

Words in mouth FTW!

JDodge · Post Post #198 (ISO) » Wed Dec 26, 2007 1:25 am

No, not really. From my perspective, you're setting up to switch your vote over because you want to try and build up a bullshit case (and accompanying wagon) based entirely off of playstyle arguments that are indisputable as so-called "universal scumtells" (which essentially only work in a vacuum). Since you can do this with either me or BBM, you decide that it's more beneficial to go after BBM (who is the easier target here, it's almost impossible to dispute otherwise) because

A.) You know you won't win that argument against me

and

B.) There's less of a meta on BBM, so it's harder for him to dispute the facts of your case.

Granted it does assume that you are scum or a complete idiot, but I feel confident in making that assumption.

kuribo · Post Post #199 (ISO) » Wed Dec 26, 2007 2:26 am

kabenon007 wrote:Why would you like it if I wouldn't be scum? That would make me townie, and that would mean you are pushing the lynch of a townie... got something to confess?

What you just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I've ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having heard it. I award you no points and may God have mercy on your soul.

It'd be nice if you weren't scum, sure, but since you are, we just have to lynch you.