Mini 521 (SMSM, Ended)

[mikeburnfire]

Mod, the PLAYERS link in post 1 still goes to an icon image.

Why the quickvote against Adele? She's obviously not scum.

[kabenon007]

Why not? You know who the scum are?

[Sarcastro]

So what's the plan? Wait for deadline and lynch someone at random?

Why would we have to wait for the deadline for that?

Vote: Fiasco

Adele is too awesome to die.

[Fiasco]

Why would we have to wait for the deadline for that?

You tell me.

[Fiasco]

Why would we have to wait for the deadline for that?

You tell me.

[ryan]

Adele is too awesome to die.

Eh?

[Xdaamno]

(Limited Access)

Huh? Quicklynch? Obviously not scum? Too awesome to die?

[ryan]

(Limited Access)

Huh? Quicklynch? Obviously not scum? Too awesome to die?

Yeah, the terms are being thrown around in this game are quite strange

[mith]

Vote Count:

5 to lynch.

Adele: 3 (Fiasco, kabenon007, SomeStrangeSimenon)
Fiasco: 3 (ryan, Sarcastro, Xdaamno)

[Xdaamno]

(Limited Access)

Huh? Quicklynch? Obviously not scum? Too awesome to die?

Yeah, the terms are being thrown around in this game are quite strange

I'd call them a bit cliche; the last two are joking around, but I'd rather it was established whether they had any reasoning or whether it was 'the opposite' of RVing.

[Fiasco]

Sorry about that double post.

Weren't we playing Speed Mafia or something?

[ryan]

That's what I was thinking, how come you aren't lynched yet?

[Fiasco]

Why should I be lynched?

[kabenon007]

Well, I don't have much to say... I've stated my reasons for voting Adele, she needs to die, that way during the next meta day we can kill her. I plan on today finding out what side Adele is on and then killing that side off. Plain and simple.

[ryan]

Why should I be lynched?

Why shouldn't you?

[SomeStrangeSimenon]

Why should I be lynched?

Why shouldn't you?

<insert "Burden of Proof" argument>

Love, Flea.

[ryan]

Why the quickvote against Adele? She's obviously not scum.

Care to clarify this yet?

[mikeburnfire]

No.

[ryan]

Fair enough.

Unvote/Vote: mikeburnfire

[mikeburnfire]

Oh noes. I'm being lynched in the subgame for which I've already forgotten my role.

[Adele]

Adele put me on ignore.

?

What do you mean? Do you feel I ignored you? What? Where?

I'd be happy to answer any questions you have.

Why did you think there was a purpose to the subgames before the subgame started and then later change your mind?

No, I still believe there is a purpose to the subgames. I was confused as to what the best purpose was for a while, and came to the belief that, at least for the first game, the real use it provided was retrospective, not immediately actionable. Hope that helps.

To clarify, do people want me dead entirely because of the above? Which part are you objecting to? The opinion I came to, or the fact that I acted on it rather than allow the game to drift into pointlessness?

Oh noes. I'm being lynched in the subgame for which I've already forgotten my role.

lolqft.

[Simenon]

No, I still believe there is a purpose to the subgames. I was confused as to what the best purpose was for a while, and came to the belief that, at least for the first game, the real use it provided was retrospective, not immediately actionable. Hope that helps.

It still doesn't explain why you seemed completely lost. And that doesn't shound characteristic of a player like yourself.

But the biggest reason I'm voting you for is this:

5>4>3>6>2>7>9>8>1 #Adele

[Adele]

No, I still believe there is a purpose to the subgames. I was confused as to what the best purpose was for a while, and came to the belief that, at least for the first game, the real use it provided was retrospective, not immediately actionable. Hope that helps.

It still doesn't explain why you seemed completely lost. And that doesn't shound characteristic of a player like yourself.

But the biggest reason I'm voting you for is this:

5>4>3>6>2>7>9>8>1 #Adele

1. Because for a while I was. It wasn't until I was called upon to articulate my thoughts that I realised what I thought.

When I was a teenager, I heard the "no chemical means of changing one element to another" rule, and thought photosynthesis an exception. It wasn't until I articulated it to someone and said the words "Carbon Dioxide" that I twigged, duh, CO₂ not an element. They didn't even need to say it. I figured it out because I said something.
It's kinda like that. Sweet of you to say I don't seem the type to get confused - in fact, I'm often the one to tentatively suggest plans that I can't figure out if they're good or bad. I'd be dire in a dethy. I'm just very upfront about the opinions I

have

formed, and I'm very good at the formal end of logic.

2. What's that? My vote list? You don't like who I voted for? Which bit?
(I was gonna cut and paste from my notes who I voted for the record, but I got the grey screen of death).

[Fiasco]

Oh noes. I'm being lynched in the subgame for which I've already forgotten my role.

lolqft.

As there could be a blocker, role hinting here seems to me like an especially bad idea.

[Adele]

Got it now: PookyTheMagicalBear, Max, kabenon007, ryan, Fiasco, Sammich, Xdaamno, Sarcastro, Adele

As there could be a blocker, role hinting here seems to me like an especially bad idea.

nah, it's just I read it, didn't much care (subroles aren't all that important in the scheme of things) and proceeded to cram my brain with Consolidated Statements of Change in Equity. Fun fun.