i dont recall even one of them right nowIn post 1046, Varsoon wrote:I've laid out several points against Drealz
All i remember was you spamming hes scum
i dont recall even one of them right nowIn post 1046, Varsoon wrote:I've laid out several points against Drealz
How about egging on the Luna-beeboy debateIn post 1048, Aeronaut wrote:What other points do you have besides that he's posting useless shit?
is that you aren't accounting for me being town who simply didn't want to engage your inane questionsIn post 1042, Varsoon wrote: The WHOLE POINT
Literally OMGUS.In post 922, drealmerz7 wrote:because he's scum duhIn post 920, Wisdom wrote:why should we vote varsoon again?
c'mon, you should know to ask better questions
I feel like people who claim to have thoughts and don't actually post them for whatever reason are more likely to be scum, like it isn't a matter of things I don't like that is an actual trend among scum I have noticed.In post 1020, pieguyn wrote:no, it really isn't, and I hope it's obvious to anyone watching that "he's ignoring me, he's scum!!11" is a really shallow reason to scum read someone.In post 1013, beeboy wrote:I would still say it is more likely he is scum for doing it, it is just something scum do much more often then town.
Also this.In post 1051, Gamma Emerald wrote:How about egging on the Luna-beeboy debateIn post 1048, Aeronaut wrote:What other points do you have besides that he's posting useless shit?
Keep slipping. Scum wouldn't be 'accounting for you being town' because they'd know you're town.In post 1052, drealmerz7 wrote:is that you aren't accounting for me being town who simply didn't want to engage your inane questionsIn post 1042, Varsoon wrote: The WHOLE POINT
you found something to latch onto to paint me as scum and then some more and pushed me as scum until you realized you couldn't back down (because of the things I say so that you can't wiggle out of it like I've learned scum to do)
keep wiggling though, it's purrrrrty
That's literally what drealz is doing.In post 1050, Wisdom wrote:i dont recall even one of them right nowIn post 1046, Varsoon wrote:I've laid out several points against Drealz
All i remember was you spamming hes scum
570 just looks like "i dislike his playstyle to me"In post 1053, Varsoon wrote:@Aero: See post 570 by me and 525 by Beeboy.
Then ISO Drealz and see how many posts of his are literally, "VOTE VARSOON HE IS SCUM" and nothing else.
That should be enough for anyone to lynch that shit.
Ok...In post 570, Varsoon wrote:Town, I'd imagine, wouldn't be so dodgy when initially prompted about their alignment--at that point, drealz was heading the conversation. I sought to drive the rhetorical power away from that.
Ok, so he was opportunistic. You could say the same about Gamma but you haven't mentioned him. Why is that?Furthermore, I don't see town being so late in their vote on me. When the initial votes swapped over to me as it was clear the Aeronaut wagon was losing traction, those made sense. Drealz' vote came after the fact, in a place that feels scum to me.
I don't really see how this matters if the other points don't.Finally, Drealz posts against me, while they may be mostly NAI, don't ever seek to vindicate the points I make against Drealz. It's this all-out attack, and, most of it, a redirect of very early points I made against Drealz. This tells me that, for some reason, those early criticisms are what stood out and what drealz takes offense to. Which, likely, means that they're on-point.
There's a pretty clear line between "This is D1 and this is the most anti-town player" and a policy lynch, such as "I don't like Wisdom, let's lynch him so we don't have to sort him out."In post 1057, Wisdom wrote:570 just looks like "i dislike his playstyle to me"In post 1053, Varsoon wrote:@Aero: See post 570 by me and 525 by Beeboy.
Then ISO Drealz and see how many posts of his are literally, "VOTE VARSOON HE IS SCUM" and nothing else.
That should be enough for anyone to lynch that shit.
I dont recall you being a fan of policy lynches?
keep scummingIn post 1056, Varsoon wrote:In post 1052, drealmerz7 wrote:is that you aren't accounting for me being townIn post 1042, Varsoon wrote: The WHOLE POINTwho simply didn't want to engage your inane questions
Keep slipping. Scum wouldn't be 'accounting for you being town' because they'd know you're town.
how LAMIST of youIn post 1039, Varsoon wrote: I would also prefer a lynch at this point, as there's plenty of content to inform one and there's just been, as I've seen, mostly bickering otherwise.
Some flips would be welcome info.
Yeah, well, I've laid out my rationale, but, y'know, fuck it. I'm the scatman. If you don't get it when I explain it, then you're not going to ever get it. We're of two different minds.In post 1064, Aeronaut wrote:Varsoon I'm really not trying to frustrate you. And you're acting like I'm the only one who doesn't understand your reasoning and it's like a lot of people
No, basically what I'm saying is that Dreal, when put under pressure, does not engage with the reality of the game, gives reads without supporting them, has been counter-pushing against my wagon with only conjecture that I am scum and little else, all while playing his up as low hanging fruit. That's anti-town play. Could it be town? Fuckin' sure, yeah, everyone could be. The whole point of mafia is to make an informed decision on your lynch. With the info I have, this is the lynch I feel most strongly about and most likely about flipping scum.In post 1063, Wisdom wrote:but thats what youre basically saying
"dreal is obnoxious/weird/other objectives, no way hes town, lets lynch him"
So simple question, have you not seen townies play like dreal (or worse) before?
IF you think that's posturing, holy shit.In post 1068, drealmerz7 wrote:how LAMIST of youIn post 1039, Varsoon wrote: I would also prefer a lynch at this point, as there's plenty of content to inform one and there's just been, as I've seen, mostly bickering otherwise.
Some flips would be welcome info.
Generating content that allows for transparency in their reads and play, actively engaging with other players, and being critical of anti-town play--these all contribute to early townreads, for me. Obviously, scum can do all those things, which is why I don't catch scum with 100% clarity every game.In post 1070, Wisdom wrote:Then do you have a townread on everyone else?
ok thats incredibly shallow and not answering my questionIn post 1072, Varsoon wrote:Generating content that allows for transparency in their reads and play, actively engaging with other players, and being critical of anti-town play--these all contribute to early townreads, for me. Obviously, scum can do all those things, which is why I don't catch scum with 100% clarity every game.