Mini 1864 - Mao Mafia [GAME OVER]
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
Read the thread in future pleaseIn post 72, SlySly wrote:
It appears our votes are being placed on the person below who we actually voted for on the list on the OP.In post 63, Radical Rat wrote:Interesting.
Either the votecount is lying, or our votes are being passively redirected.
We'll find out first lynch, I suppose.
-Radical Rat
-Shazammeroonionioli-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
________________________________________
Why are you freaking out so much? It's the equivalent of an RVS wagon. We're less than 150 posts into the game. Also, why no FOS (which is ridiculous anyway) on BTD6?In post 106, Gamma Emerald wrote:4 people have voted me with shit-all reasoning.
FOS: Clumsy Pheonix, karnos, Mas y Menos
-ClumsyLast edited by SnarkySnowman on Wed Oct 26, 2016 2:44 pm, edited 2 times in total.-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
In post 106, Gamma Emerald wrote:4 people have voted me with shit-all reasoning.
FOS: Clumsy Pheonix, karnos, Mas y Menos
Try again, friend.In post 104, Mas y Menos wrote:VOTE: btd6_maker
alpha falcon to gamma otter, delta squirrel has left base! I repeat! delta squirrel has left base!-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
Un-FOSing me isn't going to make me lay off. I still think it's an over the top reaction and FOSing people on your effectively RVS wagon is weird. I'm okay with where the vote is currently. Is BTD un-FOS'd because of going first, being baited, or because
Gamma Emerald wrote:So BTD is just being silly.-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
This. I rescind the idea that we should stop trying to figure out things, as it appears that instead of being modkilled or otherwised penalized for figuring them out, we simply stop having to deal with them.In post 130, SlySly wrote:
It's beginning to appear that outguessing the mod may be a helpful element in this game.In post 24, Gamma Emerald wrote:Let's not try to outguess the mod right now.
On an unrelated note, can you come up with a pseudonym other than Sitting Man? I understood the rest.
-Shazamalamadingdong-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
I don't know, I think it's pretty important, given that the game is themed after Mao. Although we've figured out the only rules that have been broken thus far, so there's not much more to talk about. In future though, I think rules -do- need to be figured out, because if it has anything to do with how town lynches or votes, that's a pretty big deal.
Ironstove, what do you think of Gamma?
-Clumsy-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
Read my post a little bit up. I was under the assumption that trying to guess rules would get us penalized and possibly modkilled.
-Shazim Sharazim-
-
Clumsy Phoenix
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
I think you may all be overthinking this a bit. I'm of the impression that the Chairman votes are simply the way the mod has the punishments for breaking the rules listed. Like the rule (now figured out and nullified) about not signing your posts. You get a post restriction of character limit for breaking that. If you break the character limit, you get a chairman vote against you. Note Mas Y Menos' vote numbers. I think this is simpler than imagined, but I could be wrong.
-Clumsy-
-
Clumsy Phoenix
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
Do your math on those numbers. I told you there was a mod lie in the first post.In post 288, karnos wrote:"This game has a distribution of 5:4:3:2:1"
5 vanilla town, 4 power role town, 3 mafia, 2 neutral, 1 serial killer.-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
Unless this is also a mod lie.In post 339, SnarkySnowman wrote:To those confused - I can 100% guarantee that win conditions contain no lies.-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
I think that the votes for Sitting Man are a waste of time. We need to be scumhunting, and this is just creating a diversion. I'm townreading Radical right now, and this head is willing to follow onto a Shos vote, but I want to see what this half-confirming thing is first. If he can't do it or it's not convincing, this head is willing to switch there, but I'll have to talk to my partner. I also don't like the look of 1-9, it seems like they're actively distracting from the game with their posts. Look through their ISO, just the way they're posting seems off to me.
-Clumsy-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
I don't think it was THAT urgent. Where's intent to hammer? Chance/Ask for claim? Anything aside from an insta-hammer? It's not exactly like those votes had a chance to go away.In post 433, Radical Rat wrote:In that case, we need a flip from anyone at all ASAP.
Hammer time
VOTE: BTD6_Maker-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
Dat deadline though.
RR's vote looked skeezy as hell. I'm fine with this happening.
-Clumsy-
-
Clumsy Phoenix
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
It's effectively a Dayvig to anyone that gets a 100. If someone made the rule, they would know about the 100 effect. It's still random, but what's the best way to get that 100? To spam the votes nearly 100 times to play odds that you'd get a 100 on a roll. Iron did exactly that (93 times. I did count.) And this isn't even indicitive of anything damning. If he made the rule, he just used the effective Dayvig ability to do what he wanted. Nothing wrong with that.In post 633, 123456789 wrote:What's wrong with 17? It doesnt look that bad.
Except he's saying he didn't know about it. While it's possible he got a little frustrated and just spammed votes, it seems very likely that he knew about it.ironstove wrote:It's because I instahammered RR with that rule unknowingly that he thinks I made it.
Seperate train of thought here. It's been over a full week since the start of day/hand 3. Discussion has been pretty minimal (partially on us here too today). 1-9 is at L-1. Scum could easily hammer this and be "advancing the game" pretty easily. That hasn't happened yet. So that puts me a bit on edge there. Thoughts on the two above?-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
Mmhm, and I'm pretty sure I know why as well.
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
In post 625, FaerieLord wrote:In post 656, TierShift wrote:
Are you even in this game?In post 650, CloudKicker wrote:Can anyone just resume me the game and what happened ? i dont really want to reread everything
I think we should lynch the possible cult leader. We should just eliminate the paranoia, I think.
VOTE: 1-9In post 681, Clumsy Phoenix wrote:VOTE: 123456789
In case it wasn't already hammer for some reason. Cloud, I know you don't want to read through the game, but it's really not -that- long. It's weird enough as is, and a secondhand explanation will not put you in a good position in the game. If you're town, just read it.That's 9 votes on 1-9, and still no lynch. I feel like we're completely wandering in the dark here. Also, I don't know about YOU guys, but lynching the chairman is NOT part of my town role PM win condition. So why are you following that?
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
Yeah, on my end (Clumsy) I was like "Yeah, we have a while to put in an action, I'll do it later." And later happened before I knew it. Oops.
That's a really cool role actually. There's no doubt that you are what you say you are. Karnos's hint definetely checks out, 1-9 kind of feels stretched, but I can see it I guess. Ours straight up says "Track", which works I suppose, but I do see what you mean about the confusion. -shrug-
Role cops are usually town, but we can't rule your alignment out completely, however I've got good feelings about this.-
-
Clumsy Phoenix
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
Somebody didn't bother reading. I'm also fine with giving Mathblade rope, just sayin'.In post 0, SnarkySnowman wrote:5) Voting: All votes within a single post will count... until someone picks up on this idea.-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
Alright so you acknowledge that the vote is not in effect, but you want people to use the ineffective rule. You are ignoring that in no other case has a rule being nullified been a mod lie. You also want us to hammer somebody without the group consensus, just because you don't think we really mean it if we don't. That is the worst damn moon logic I think I've seen all year, and I've seen people vote somebody for being -too town-.
-Shazimzamzeroo-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
In post 765, MathBlade wrote:Man this game looks awesome!!
Faerie Lord, can you please demonstrate with votes on a scale of 1-10 how sure you are cloudkicker is scum to you?
Not really feeling mass claim ATM or the cloudkicker lynch.In post 766, MathBlade wrote:For example if you were really sure Cloud kicker was scum you would vote him 10 times.In post 769, MathBlade wrote:Seriously if you believe Cloudkicker is scum vote him 10 times.
Why are you asking for so many votes? I almost feel like this is an alternate win condition with how much you're pushing this for no reason. Why 10? Why should we vote him 10 times if it doesn't do anything?
-Cloobsor-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
In post 759, FaerieLord wrote:FoS: Cloudkicker.
If his next post isn't a claim / asking to be replaced out, I'll be more than happy to lynch.In post 765, MathBlade wrote:Man this game looks awesome!!
Faerie Lord, can you please demonstrate with votes on a scale of 1-10 how sure you are cloudkicker is scum to you?
Not really feeling mass claim ATM or the cloudkicker lynch.
Wait, are you really egging FaerieLord on to hammer Cloudkicker... when you're against the cloudkicker lynch? Explain.-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
-
-
Clumsy Phoenix Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 778
- Joined: May 2, 2016
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-