STEVEN UNIVERSE 2 - GAME OVER

[Creature]

Beach-a-palooza votes.

[Not Chara]

RR: it's been called a permanent alliance, so that's how i'm treating it. someone tell me if this list is wrong anywhere. it's sorted by player voted for.

Rational: mastin (+1)
Skybird: mastin (+1)
Almost: mastin (+1)
Mastin: self (+3)
Yume: mastin (+2)

total: 8

Chara: self (+3)
Farside: Chara (+2)
total: 5

Titus: self (+3)
Kraska: Titus (+1)
Xkfyu: Titus (+1)
Grapes: Titus (+1)
total: 6

Shiro: none
Snarky: none
DGB: none
Random: none
Fuzzy: none (didn't answer?)
TWIE: none

Creature: shadow step
Magna: voted Rational
Shadow step: Almost
Fire: Rational

McMenno: self

there you are. point values assume town players.

[Creature]

Everyone confirmed right?

[Not Chara]

so, now that i know DGB's claim is real. she becomes a third player who can't be nightkilled.
third party. she's probably third party. i'd rather lynch actual scum, but that recalculating can wait for after my break.

Creature: all of those votes are confirmed.

[Creature]

These third parties. What would stop them from working against us when they get the chance to?

[Not Chara]

Titus: any way i could convince you to instead lynch in:

"Shiro: none
Snarky: none
DGB: none
Random: none
TWIE: none

Creature: shadow step
Magna: voted Rational
Shadow step: Almost"
you said yourself that lynching in the outside group is the best bet.
your 'guilty' on farside revealed her as ascetic. still, at worst, she's simply third party who was ascetic.

[Titus]

so, now that i know DGB's claim is real. she becomes a third player who can't be nightkilled.
third party. she's probably third party. i'd rather lynch actual scum, but that recalculating can wait for after my break.

Creature: all of those votes are confirmed.

*bats eyelashes*

Bulletproof is an awesome town gambit too.

[Titus]

Titus: any way i could convince you to instead lynch in:

"Shiro: none
Snarky: none
DGB: none
Random: none
TWIE: none

Creature: shadow step
Magna: voted Rational
Shadow step: Almost"
you said yourself that lynching in the outside group is the best bet.
your 'guilty' on farside revealed her as ascetic. still, at worst, she's simply third party who was ascetic.

You could, but the fact that the entire group but Farside is refusing to lynch Farside is strong indication of Farside being scum.

[Not Chara]

These third parties. What would stop them from working against us when they get the chance to?

i guess, nothing? i'm not concerned with hunting third parties as much as i am with scum. who are actually working against us.
if you'll notice, i've still included DGB in my lynchpool.

pedit: ally with me, Titus. i'll even take Shiro.

peditx2: really? time to check that.

[Not Chara]

Titus: any way i could convince you to instead lynch in:

"Shiro: none
Snarky: none
DGB: none
Random: none
TWIE: none

Creature: shadow step
Magna: voted Rational
Shadow step: Almost"
you said yourself that lynching in the outside group is the best bet.
your 'guilty' on farside revealed her as ascetic. still, at worst, she's simply third party who was ascetic.

You could, but the fact that the entire group but Farside is refusing to lynch Farside is strong indication of Farside being scum.

i just checked Shiro, Snarky, DGB, and Random. Shiro (your

townread

) is the only one refusing to lynch farside) the others are either voting her or saying they would. please don't make blanket statements, it's misleading to people who aren't properly reading the thread.

[Not Chara]

i finished checking. my proposed lynchpool includes three players refusing to lynch farside. they're Shadow, Creature, and Shiro. the rest are entirely fine with it or voting the wagon.
so no, i'm not convinced farside is scum from that and it certainly isn't an indicator.

[Creature]

I am not refusing to lynch farside22.

[Not Chara]

Drixx: i realized i forgot to properly respond to you. i see your analysis of a possible gambit and think it's a good one. i just don't agree, for reasons i've said.

pedit: bad wording in my case. my point was you weren't on her wagon right now.

[Titus]

@NC, I apologize for the poor wording but the strong resistance to the Farside wagon mostly coming from those who didn't vote confirmed town in the beach event says something.

The fact Farside gambited (regardless of her alignment) to be conftown says something.

The fact Farside denied Yume alliance abilities (we'll more accurately thought she would have) says something.

The fact Farside made several players cease to be bulletproof without consulting others seriously says something.

The fact Farside withheld being ascetic until there was no other option says something.

Farside's claim that she blocked grapes, who is obviously fuking town and she never pushed as scum all game says something.

The 180 on SirCakez when Mastina and I reached an agreement on SirCakez says something.

When her read was wrong, her continued attacks in the same manner SirCakez says something.

Her pattern of ending neighborhoods when the other parties don't treat her like God says something.

Her inability to go after or even hint at the other ascetics being liars says something.

There's too much to overlook.

[Titus]

Oh I forgot to mention the block on grapes she claimed jeopardized the lives of town for something she had zero idea of any worth to town.

[Creature]

Did you get the conclusions from this Beach-a-palooza event?

[MagnaofIllusion]

Titus you forgot her "joking" about being lynchproof to discourage the wagon ...

[Titus]

Did you get the conclusions from this Beach-a-palooza event?

At least one scum in RR/Almost50/Skybird barring mod error.

Too many town failed to vote to get useful conclusions beyond that without flips yet.

[Titus]

Titus you forgot her "joking" about being lynchproof to discourage the wagon ...

Oh yeah and the dayvig thing too.

[Creature]

VOTE: farside22

Right

[Creature]

Also, I don't know how many votes we're at.

[Varsoon]

Game has been locked while I confirm something.
EDIT: Game has been unlocked. Please continue play.

[Varsoon]

@Varsooon: please confirm that the beachapalooza votes are accurate.
@Yume/Mastin: please confirm with Varsoon the number of votes yume would give if voting for mastin.

The Beach-A-Palooza is correct, as far as I am aware, after checking it about a dozen times both when I posted it and now.

[Varsoon]

@Varsoon: Presuming the claimed permanent alliance between Mastin and Yume exists as publicly claimed, would that claimed permanent alliance have impacted the points for Beach-a-palooza voting? Can you please check that the point totals you gave are consistent with however you decided that and let us know? Thanks.

I'm not going to engage in hypotheticals like this--don't expect me to confirm or deny any sort of information that uses any single player, flavor, etc. in a hypothetical.
To get at the heart of your question, though?
All Alliances counted towards Beach-A-Palooza as Alliances should for the points earned.
This includes Event Alliances such as the one formed from the 'Joy Ride' event.

[Varsoon]