Do you mind if I ask you your experience Rhazh?In post 133, RhazhBash wrote:Snake I need to ask. What experience with Mafia do you have aside from EM?
Your play thus far reflects somebody who carries lots of ethos.
Do you mind if I ask you your experience Rhazh?In post 133, RhazhBash wrote:Snake I need to ask. What experience with Mafia do you have aside from EM?
I haven't seen any where scum was hung D1. I expect to find that, of newbie games (with two scum out of nine players), less than two in nine games have scum lynched on day one. (If the lynches were random, it would be two in nine, but by and large scum will usually try to get town lynched, and on day one I expect that to skew the ratio against Town).In post 143, Grendel wrote:Do you ever read other games? There are garnteed to be games were scum was hung D1 for legitimate reasons.
Insignificantly scummier. I have no significant reads at all.In post 145, Grendel wrote:How much scummier is Box World compared to Pokémon Remake Emerald, and Old Man Victor?In post 121, CCC wrote:
In my previous post, I suggested that VictorDeAngelo and Gamma Emerald were pinging as very slightly scum. To that list I will now add GreenNope and Square World; the first for being completely absent, and the second for providing extremely short posts with no reasons for his votes. From these four, I will elect to park my vote (for the moment) on:
VOTE: Square World
Also, stop self-metaing at the drop of a hat.
Lots of off site experience. Around 18 games on my main site not including ones I replaced/flaked out of early. I don't play on this site much though. I've been playing Mafia for around a year now.In post 150, Grendel wrote:Do you mind if I ask you your experience Rhazh?In post 133, RhazhBash wrote:Snake I need to ask. What experience with Mafia do you have aside from EM?
Your play thus far reflects somebody who carries lots of ethos.
It happens:In post 151, CCC wrote:I haven't seen any where scum was hung D1. I expect to find that, of newbie games (with two scum out of nine players), less than two in nine games have scum lynched on day one. (If the lynches were random, it would be two in nine, but by and large scum will usually try to get town lynched, and on day one I expect that to skew the ratio against Town).In post 143, Grendel wrote:Do you ever read other games? There are garnteed to be games were scum was hung D1 for legitimate reasons.
I guess I am pessimistic about day one. Later days, when there's some decent info to work with, I consider far more useful.
I'm town reading him for humoring me.In post 153, Manuel87 wrote: @Grendel: When you made your read on eagerSnake in 102 was that considering him being your buddy or was that a serious read on his play?
In the post right after 121 you referenced how you math in other games. And I think you did it a couple other times this game to. By "it" I mean you have said, "Well I do that all the time so its not AI" in response to accusations. I don't like that because it doesn't refute the argument so much as it lampshades it. Lamp shading a problem doesn't make it go away. Saying you do something as either alignment doesn't make you town.
No response?In post 143, Grendel wrote:
If I got reads from nothing but "nullness" then that should be a reason to suspect me right?In post 109, gerryoat wrote:Grendel, I'll say it again, i don't see how you get all those reads in 3 pages of pretty much nullness.
If it is for you then push me. This game needs more clashing.
Would like to know why you feel that way. I really don't see how he has been particularly insightful.
sorry, I missed this somehow. Yes, I understand that you can get reads that way, but you have to look at it from my point of view. Some guy just randomly puts out a list of reads only 3 pages into with only "reactionary" votes. It just doesn't seem legit and seems like they are trying to look townie, instead of actually worried about getting the reads correctly. Which is why I'm just weary of it right now. I never said I hard scumread you or anything for it, which is why my vote stays where it is.In post 162, Grendel wrote:@GerryOatNo response?In post 143, Grendel wrote:
If I got reads from nothing but "nullness" then that should be a reason to suspect me right?In post 109, gerryoat wrote:Grendel, I'll say it again, i don't see how you get all those reads in 3 pages of pretty much nullness.
If it is for you then push me. This game needs more clashing.
I like how that's all it takes for you to change your read on me. But, I actually agree with him. I was actually going to ask you why you TR me, cause I haven't done anything so far that would warrant a townread so far.In post 164, Gamma Emerald wrote:Okay.
Null - Gerry (seems reasonable, but hasn't really added much yet.)
I mainly said that because he diffused everyone's getting up in arms about your reads.
idk man, I just feel like you've been tip toeing around me most this game. Your also not trying to fight my scum read on you. I just don't expect this passiveness from you if you were town. Yet... you are in a lot of games... so I can't really tell if your too stretched to bother. eeeehhhhh-Grendel wrote:You are avoiding conflict with me.
Why?
That list of reads doesn't include you, Rhazh, Square, Victor, or soon to be replaced Green Nope. I still have more ppl to sort lol. And even then people I put I my reads can be subject to change.gerryoat wrote:I kinda like Grendel trying to get "conflict" in the game, which in a sense is how you get reads more. So I do slightly tr that from him. But his actions and his words are a bit off right now. He says this game needs more conflict, but he already laid out a list of reads. Why does he keep saying this game needs more conflict when he already has a list of reads 3 pages in.
I am kinda stretched, but I'm also putting precedence in games I feel are more pressing. This one is kinda on the low end, but it's not on the bottom.In post 170, Grendel wrote:idk man, I just feel like you've been tip toeing around me most this game. Your also not trying to fight my scum read on you. I just don't expect this passiveness from you if you were town. Yet... you are in a lot of games... so I can't really tell if your too stretched to bother. eeeehhhhh-Grendel wrote:You are avoiding conflict with me.
Why?
That is interesting. I'll have to look into that later.Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 170, Grendel wrote: Not sure about RhazhBash, but both Eager and CCC attacked me for my attempt at setup spec.
Quote and explain plsGamma Emerald wrote:Looking over RhazhBash's ISO again, I found something that I feel could be distancing between RhazhBash and EagerSnake, with an attempt to attack me as well.
Grendel, this is what I was talking about. It's a strange way to distance, to be sure, but it kinda looks like distancing. And I do acknowledge that he mentioned me too, but that could have been an attack on me, or an attempt to group me in with Eager.In post 87, RhazhBash wrote:The page 3 stuff between Snake and Gamma is 100% fluff. I don't see how Victor can be scumreading snake for it either. Regardless I don't see it as alignment indicative.
Also a huge pet peeve of mine is when people waste too much time on setup spec. Setup spec won't win Town the game, so quit it and start posting some real content.