I thought it was like that as well, but it doesn't say anywhere.In post 1504, PeregrineV wrote:Based on?In post 1501, Titus wrote:Because everyone can be warden and wardens are the only way players have PRs.
I've seen exactly 2 role PMs.
Mine and the sample.
Assuming Beiber has seen the same-
Curious as to why Beiber thinkseveryonehas a PR?
And wow, this is a terrible vote count...In post 1650, A Song of Ice and Fire wrote:
By civilized standards Fereldan cities are anarchic, and Denerim is no exception. The Fereldan penchant for personal freedom engenders a laissez-faire attitude towards law enforcement and public behavior in general.
[/b]
In post 815, Feelmi Udders wrote:This is a bad post. What are you trying to imply with regards to ABR's alignment?In post 805, Dunnstral wrote:Note how this post exists only to deter a lynch on himself. If he had something important he'd use the last will instead of making a big show out of it.In post 765, Albert B. Rampage wrote:I will breadcrumb important information in this post in case I'm mislynched during my V/LA that starts on Tuesday.
We drink to our youth, for the days come and gone.
For the age of oppression is now nearly done.
We'll drive out the Empire from this land that we own.
With our blood and our steel we'll take back our home.
All hail to Ulfric! You are the High King!
In your great honor we drink and we sing.
We're the children of Skyrim, and we fight all our lives.
And when Sovngarde beckons, every one of us dies!
But this land is ours and we'll see it wiped clean.
Of the scourge that has sullied our hopes and our dreams!
Well from what they have posted, this looks like town-aligned scumhunting. From how confident they are, Feelmi Udders has seen Dunnstral's alignment and wants to do something about it.In post 830, Feelmi Udders wrote:It is terrible. It attempts to cast the post in a negative light while avoiding comment on how it is alignment indicative. Even now, you're dodging my question with regards to what you're trying to imply with regards to ABR's alignment.In post 817, Dunnstral wrote:No that's a bad post, it's very clear what my stance on Abr is.
Is that your contribution to the game?
Your post was not a very clear stance on ABR in the slightest - this answer you gave in response dodged my very clear inquiry of providing a stance on ABR.
VOTE: DUNNSTRAL
This is scum-aligned because Vedith says that itIn post 1527, Vedith wrote:Also, I disagree, calling someone as a scrub is more of a friendly banter term, at least online.In post 1522, Motoko and Scully wrote:210 says that orlais your hood and antiva are filled with scrubs is scumhunting. You try to minimize that off as "banter" suggests he's right. Talking about fluff when it relates to alignment is scumhunting.
"Scrub - Someone who is below your level." Does this make someone scummy?
I like the way that SirCakez deals with the accusations against him, in this and other posts.In post 1545, SirCakez wrote:If anyone has actually legitimate concerns with me, not stuff like "not doing anything" or other garbage, please let me know.
I know everyone will dismiss this as semantics...In post 1679, iraonavp wrote:This is scum-aligned because Vedith says that itIn post 1527, Vedith wrote:Also, I disagree, calling someone as a scrub is more of a friendly banter term, at least online.In post 1522, Motoko and Scully wrote:210 says that orlais your hood and antiva are filled with scrubs is scumhunting. You try to minimize that off as "banter" suggests he's right. Talking about fluff when it relates to alignment is scumhunting.
"Scrub - Someone who is below your level." Does this make someone scummy?couldbe this, rather than saying what it was this.
They are extremely manipulative and it's just forcing their bad agenda on everyone else. That's why we should listen to Albert B. Rampage as a leader instead of Motoko and Scully, because he is actually going to lynch scum-aligned players...In post 1527, Vedith wrote:Now, I don't know whether you're scum, or if you just have a manipulative scum-hunting style (and we just happen to be seeing things very differently). Time will help sort that out.
This post is a literal scumclaim...In post 1585, Radical Rat wrote:"Hello, I won't talk to you about my scumreads unless you vote them first, kthxbai"
This is nonsensical...In post 1614, Luna Fox wrote:Funny thing tho is that you're probably town if there is indeed scum in tevinter. Otherwise you wouldn't be arguing this.In post 1612, Albert B. Rampage wrote:You're scum, nobody trusts you except, a word that I will not say. I won't say it.
What? I'm town-aligned.In post 1643, Frizzy Cola wrote:Yeah I'm totally dropping my townread of iraonIn post 1637, iraonavp wrote:Okay, I'm just going to sheep Albert B. Rampage because I haven't read all the pages yet.
VOTE: Luna Fox
do you really think that sircakez will be instalynched if you flip town? because that's not going to happenIn post 1575, yellowbaron wrote:I do have a scum lean on you at the moment.In post 1573, SirCakez wrote:boring what's your individual read on me, without rb's influence? I'm curious.
I think it's curious that you'd ease off like that when things got heated. Especially after the blacklist remark. If you genuinely think we're scum, then as aggressive as my other head was, it would make a lot of sense for you to tear us a new one. I mean, he was right there spitting in your face. All you had to do was roll with the momentum. You wouldn't have to fling mud, you could have done it calmly if that's your way. In any case, I'm sure a lot of people would have followed you.
So it does leave me to wonder why you didn't. I see the possibilities as
A) You're scum, and you know we're town. So if you spearheaded our wagon and kept it rolling, you'll be in the noose when we flip. It's safer to let others help you, and diffuse the blame.
B) You're town, you are doubting that we're actually scum. You just don't know how to reconcile the conflict, and save credibility after a very understandable OMGUS reaction-read.
C) You're town, you honestly think we're scum, and you're biding your time.
If I had to give weight to the possibilities, I'd say 55% A, 35% B, 10% C.
I think rb is more like 100% A.
Spoiler:
~boring
In post 1578, yellowbaron wrote:you really like strawmanning don't you. no, that's not the only thing why we voted you. you basically breathe scumIn post 1577, rb wrote:I'm afraid you're being stupid and wrong and forcing your stupid and wrong on everyone else with this townblocking, since apparently everyone who scumreads anyone who you consider town results in you cutting them down asap.In post 1555, Motoko and Scully wrote:Do you think any are scum on the Masq wagon aside from Cakey? I have been hard pushing Masq. I don't want to lynch my zord buddy though. The hood knows that, so why are you afraid?In post 1553, yellowbaron wrote:The Masq wagon has a few Tevinters and what looks to be a couple sheep votes. M&S have been tending the small, but loyal flock by helping them cry "wolf" at their detractors. They think Masq is the lowest-hanging fruit at the moment, but it looks like the crew is testing the waters to try us too. IMO, Masq is either town, or she's knowingly playing a fast and loose scum game. The former is more likely.In post 1534, Foxbeebirdboy wrote:Both the Masq and FU wagons have pretty shit compositions.
Can someone explain to me the Masq case because FU can't be scum with Dunnstral and Masq was a gut town read of mine lol
The Feelmi wagon is barely more than policy. I'm not saying she's a town read, but it's Day 1. Lurkers can't lurk forever.
Why do you think Masq is low hanging fruit as opposed to scum?
~Titus
Stfu and let people sort the game the way they sort it. Not everyone is inclined to make like 8 townreads in 1 day based on one-liners and nation choices that scum could manipulate in almost any way they wanted. Maybe they stack day chat, maybe they stack ferelden. Maybe the spread out in all 4 for chance at all-scum Warden nights or maybe they stack 2 for regular Wardens and just let town have their own 1-2 Wardens.
Cakes and Rat are still scum btw. If TBB is town they're absolute garbage. They voted on me for an apparent "hypocritical" remark that I clearly showed wasn't and then they just dodged and ignored that point.
Still catching up.
~rb
Ayy lmao
In post 1608, Luna Fox wrote:beeboy dont you want a 5 person masonry?
In post 1641, Foxbeebirdboy wrote:how it is or isn't role related*
I agree with this post except for the yb/rr readIn post 1653, Shiro wrote:Ok guys, I 180, Baron is town, Radical is the scum of the two.
So can you guys do me the favor of l-1ing FU? I am gonna admit that the masquerade wagon seems pretty town led but guys, guys it is still horrible while the FU one is also pretty town led but in contrary is actually good.
Which townie would not try to get engaged when being obviously driven to death?
Answer: none
It is scum hoping his buddies will divert attention and the lurking will make them forgetful enough for people to after that move on.
In post 1686, iraonavp wrote:What? I'm town-aligned.In post 1643, Frizzy Cola wrote:Yeah I'm totally dropping my townread of iraonIn post 1637, iraonavp wrote:Okay, I'm just going to sheep Albert B. Rampage because I haven't read all the pages yet.
VOTE: Luna Fox
>wants him to flipIn post 1688, Masquerade wrote:Guys can we just flip me to show how wrong Tevinter is today?
>votes luna
I'm actually saying that is it, not could be. How on earth did you get "could be" from my comment?In post 1679, iraonavp wrote:This is scum-aligned because Vedith says that it could be this, rather than saying what it was this.
I did not post that, why are you editing my posts?In post 1683, iraonavp wrote:They are extremely manipulative and it's just forcing their bad agenda on everyone else. That's why we should listen to Albert B. Rampage as a leader instead of Motoko and Scully, because he is actually going to lynch scum-aligned players...In post 1527, Vedith wrote:Now, I don't know whether you're scum, or if you just have a manipulative scum-hunting style (and we just happen to be seeing things very differently). Time will help sort that out.
Fine.In post 1690, Frizzy Cola wrote:>wants him to flipIn post 1688, Masquerade wrote:Guys can we just flip me to show how wrong Tevinter is today?
>votes luna
uuuhhhh.... ????
