This is through page 30 - I hope to get to more today, but no promises.
In post 581, Motoko and Scully wrote:ABR, can I visit your temple of wisdom of infinite reads? I see none and you usually don't mind cracking heads. What's up?
Do you have a read on ABR here based on what you're seeing versus what you expect? This feels like you're insinuating he's scum since it's not what you're used to without outright saying it.
Yeah, I don't like this. Self-meta is terrible, meta from one game is terrible, and using an action that easily changeable is terrible.In post 586, Dunnstral wrote:I did not utilize the pt because I was scum in that gameIn post 585, Frizzy Cola wrote:After what happened last time?In post 582, Dunnstral wrote:Are you guys excited to be in a pt with DUNNSTRAL
No
There's already been 25 pages of stuff - why would you ask if people are still RVSing? Wouldn't asking directly about reads make more sense?In post 606, Frizzy Cola wrote:are ya'll RVS'ing?
What do you think about the specific nation they joined, considering that was their only post all game?In post 611, iraonavp wrote:Why are you voting Feelmi Udders?
This is their only post in the entire game.
Why the vote on ira? He seemed to be town read by quite a few people at this point, and I don't buy RVS at this point.
If you actually intended this as a reaction test, why would you say so in the first place?In post 628, Motoko and Scully wrote:Reaction fish time.
VOTE: Albert B. Rampage
Where's the beef? It's what's for dinner.
~Titus
This is their first(ish) post after the actual day started, and the only vote on you. Why do you seem so concerned about this vote?In post 654, iraonavp wrote:Why are you voting me?
I find it suspicious and slightly scum-aligned that you would just vote me without mentioning me at all or giving any reason.
In post 683, Masquerade wrote:Ooh will I be the first wagon of the day? Cool. More votes on me please.
I said I was already developing townreads. I don't feel comfortable outing all of those very soon because I know my alignment and I don't want my stances being copied. So I'm going to see how this day develops, and if you just read my posts my reads will become clear sooner or later. That's how I work. I don't do lists. If you don;t like it, lynch me.
Regardless of how you put out reads, more information is more better for town. We have to convince each other why somebody may or may not be scum - not sharing that info does nothing to help us. You may look at something differently than I do, which would both further discussion and maybe sway one of our reads.In post 697, Masquerade wrote:Ahw.
I'm btw not that worried about being copied, more about being influenced too much. And giving too much away will just give scum more opportunities to play me. Which plenty of you have seen me fall for in the past.
Then, you go and literally contradict yourself. So, which is it? You don't want your stances copied, or you're not worried about them being copied?
What are your reads on Masquerade here?In post 688, iraonavp wrote:VOTE: Dunnstral
I think he had scum-aligned and vulture-like circling of Masquerade, which was not scumhunting but trying to make Masquerade look bad.