In post 265, MissTerry wrote:that's why I don't think constantly saying outright, hey I'm town! Is a very townish thing to do. But it could be a slipup, we're both newbies. That kind of a post just sets off red flags for me.
How can it be a slipup? A slipup of what? Either he's town and is telling the truth, or is scum and lying - I don't see any potential slips.
In post 266, BlankFace wrote:I'm literally
always
logged into the site. I have a tab open and never turn off my computer. Plus, I have been lurking and skimming. Waiting, really.
Just having a tab open doesn't keep you logged in, activity keeps you logged in.
I agree that you have been lurking - that's what I said.
In post 268, Harkonnen97 wrote:You are making this overly complicated. I'm not even sure what was the start of this topic. I think you said "If you think that Loop's pressure on you was town, why isn't our wagon on him town?" ?
Well, while you did give your reasoning, I don't like MissTerry's and Penguin's reasonings. They don't put pressure. So what's left for Loopdan is to defend himself only against you. And trying to have a verbal fight with you is a fucking endless torture. You just keep asking questions after questions. While some of them are good and I can see town motivation, some of them are also just basic and pointless things, like ... don't know how to say it.
My questions have a purpose.
I think both Penguin and Miss Terry have done solid work in explaining their issues - you can disagree with them, but you can't say they haven't been expressed.
In post 268, Harkonnen97 wrote:His whole #218 post is defending himself against my accusations, and ends it with a NEW READLIST. In which he puts me from "Lean Town" to "Null", in retaliation to me scumreading him. Why would he put me at null anyway? Isn't he scumreading me? The only people he is scumreading in that post are the person who was the biggest wagon on him, and who has the IC verbally pounding him, and the 2 inactives.
The point is, he doesn't admit that his new readlist is in response to my accusation.
He doesn't really deny it either - I see him denying that his posting time was connected to your attack, but that's it.
Am I missing something here?
In post 271, Harkonnen97 wrote:Also sorry for that long Smurf wall. I should probably start dissecting Thor's walls when I answer then.
Yeah, I don't know about anyone else, but the orange text answers in my quotes when I'm quoting orange text answers takes a little while to sort out.
Does anyone?
In post 274, BlankFace wrote:Thor:
In post 164, Thor665 wrote:Apologies for my lateness - I blame the mod for not giving me a game link and therefore it never going into my bookmark queue.
No offense, but poor excuse. It took a click to find this game. You got a PM saying the day had started. You not checking it is not the mods fault. It took me two clicks to find the game and bookmark it after I got my roll pm. You had two PMs before you had to be prodded but whatever. This is probably NAI.
Why did you ignore my winky face? I mean, what did you think this -->
meant? That I was being super serious in placing blame?
In post 274, BlankFace wrote:I agree with Hark's sentiments about Thor's Loop vote and do not like his
176. If Loopdan was sliding, why not comment on it? It pretty much amounts to a naked vote and when prompted, he doesn't really offer why Loopdan started to slide.
Yes I did, you even quoted it.
In post 274, BlankFace wrote: In post 180, Thor665 wrote:If I explained why you are scum would you ever agree with me? Don't really see the point.
I changed my read on you from town to scum because though you opened kind of nicely with actual scumhunting but then shifted to saying a whole lot of nothing and also advancing nothing. At this point I feel like you're actively trying not to advance anything - just coasting.
That kind of looks like a description.
Loop then commented on it (agreeing it had happened).
So...what is your issue here? That I indicated it was silly to bother to present the read, and then, when asked, presented it?
Yeah - how manipulative of me.
I don't get your issue - what is your issue again? That I didn't present it initially, or in a catchup that (and this might be intense to hear) did *not* contain every thought I had, or every change of thought?
Because it didn't, I'll admit that now.
In post 274, BlankFace wrote:
In post 201, Thor665 wrote:There is nothing I said that implies I don't check my inbox - in fact I actively stated that I had, which would be the opposite of saying I don't.
Why did that confuse you?
It's confusing as Smurf because if you check your inbox you'd know the game had started. And even if you didn't have a game link, it is not hard to find. It is pure laziness. So yeah, you were lurking. You
knew
the game was ongoing and chose to do nothing. Don't blame the mod for your laziness.
Okay, so at worst you've proven I'm a lazy player (something I have never denied and have claimed in other games.
I don't get how that proves anything about my alignment.
Are you saying when I get a town PM I stop being lazy?
Because you're harping on this point alot (twice in one post) and I feel like you're kind of claiming it as proof I'm scum - which makes no sense.
Am i missing something here?
)
