Mini 521 (SMSM, Ended)

[Xdaamno]

Hm, good point. Also, "You have a plan for town to kill scum? Or a plan for scum to kill town?" looks like incriminating with more evidence to me; but otherwise, town vibes from you.

Double-Accounters, Putting ~Aimee, ~ssf etc at the end of your posts/bits of your posts should make it a lot easier for everyone, IMO :/

Waterboy could be playing the "Oh no, he's dead!" act as scum, but that's a pretty lame gambit, so I'll have to decide based on further reads.

I've noticed a few hints at sub-roles so far, which is not nessecary; mainly stemming from the talk of our 'past roles', which I feel is distracting and we'd do well to drop at the moment.

Also, Fiasco, the questions you asked Max seemed fairly good to me at first, but... how do you think he could of known, if he does? It's not anything that could implicate him as scum (Since we know role info won't help him, of course).

[Xdaamno]

looks like incriminating with

no

evidence to me;

Fixed.

[mith]

Vote Count:

6 to lynch.

Max: 3 (Fiasco, WaterboyWaldo, Xdaamno)
Fiasco: 2 (Max, SomeStrangeSimenon)
PookyTheMagicalBear: 1 (Thorned Rose)
Sammich: 1 (ryan)

[Thorned Rose]

(Aimee here again)

I don't understand Max's comments at the beginning. When you say you had a chance of winning, does that mean you think the town has less of a chance/or is unbalanced?

I see what Fiasco was saying, but I don't understand Max's earlier accusation. Why would Fiasco be responsible for this?

[Xdaamno]

(Aimee here again)

I don't understand Max's comments at the beginning. When you say you had a chance of winning, does that mean you think the town has less of a chance/or is unbalanced?

I see what Fiasco was saying, but I don't understand Max's earlier accusation. Why would Fiasco be responsible for this?

Yes; I think, rather than us all pondering over this, Max should just answer the questions already.

[WaterboyWaldo]

I am not voting at random; I believe Max to be acting suspicious. Also, the deadline isn't THAT short. It's pretty much a whole week. We have plenty of time to kill him.

[kabenon007]

I am not voting at random; I believe Max to be acting suspicious. Also, the deadline isn't THAT short. It's pretty much a whole week. We have plenty of time to kill him.

vote WaterboyWaldo.

No need to rush into a lynch then if we have a whole week, and you are seeming pretty singleminded there, Waldo...

Also, I'm suspicious of Max as well. His whole, "I've got a plan, but I'm not gonna reveal what it is" is most likely just him trying to make himself look useful. But he could really have a plan, but it does us no good if we don't know what it is, because his results could be purely opinionated on his part, and therefore skewed.

[WaterboyWaldo]

You say I'm rushing, even though I just said that there's plenty of time. You agree with me and call Max suspicious, but vote me for it. You call me singleminded, but ^ that was the first post you've made in which you give

your

suspicions. There is absolutely nothing suspicious about this at all. Nope.

unvote, vote kabenon007

[kabenon007]

I'm merely talking about your word choice, Waldo. We have plenty of time to lynch him? That sounds like you already have the day planned out. And only scum would be that single-minded.

And calling me single-minded in response to a post that contains two suspects... am I single-minded in two ways?

[Fiasco]

Waldo, did I misinterpret? You seemed sure you wanted Max lynched, and yet you suddenly switched your vote. In six days we don't just need to lynch someone, we need to decide whom to lynch with enough of a safety margin to deal with any role or investigation claims.

Max,

I won't mention it as it will give it away if I'm scum in any future games

How would mentioning a pro-town plan give anything away if you're scum in future games? I don't understand.

[Sammich]

It's rly awkward that ryan voted me without any explanation.

Didn't anyone notice that?

[Fiasco]

We should aim to have someone at Claim Or Die by Wednesday, I think.

[Adele]

For those against joint accounts, you're going to hate us. This is JordanA24 and Aimee, who agreed to replace together because of time constraints.

From now, our posts will have a clear "(Aimee)" for example at the starts of our posts, so that you know who is speaking.

(Anyway this is Aimee here.)

Random vote:

vote: Pooky

. He's too cuddly!

If you're doubleheaded, that's cool and all - just don't expect me to care which head's speaking, because I'm going to treat you as a unit.

Also: please get an avatar! I'd be really,

really

grateful.

kabenon, Waterboywaldo (how should I shorten that name? Suggestions?) wasn't calling you singleminded, but hypocritical. I think his point was "at least I contributed my opinions, before you did by the way".

Max is annoying me. Haven't decided if I distrust him yet. I do want to know why he saw fit to share the "role that didn't happen" information with the town.

We should aim to have someone at Claim Or Die by Wednesday, I think.

/agree. It also seems to me that there is

less

at stake in this game than a normal mini; all will do is limit our Main Game lynch options, which for the first lynch, won't necessarily be all that hot anyway.

Hmm. An idea occurs, a precipitate to a mass roleclaim down the line; if everyone stated now whether their role is the same as first time around. May be useful for catching folk in lies down the line... may be unutterably stupid. Thoughts?

[Fiasco]

Clarification:

Waldo, did I misinterpret? You seemed sure you wanted Max lynched, and yet you suddenly switched your vote. In six days we don't just need to lynch someone, we need to decide whom to lynch with enough of a safety margin to deal with any role or investigation claims.

This suggests that I'd like Max bandwagoned already, which is not the case; I'd just like us to start working on the decision. I meant to point out separately that Waldo's vote switch didn't make sense to me, as a point against Waldo.

[Fiasco]

An idea occurs, a precipitate to a mass roleclaim down the line; if everyone stated now whether their role is the same as first time around. May be useful for catching folk in lies down the line... may be unutterably stupid. Thoughts?

Bad idea: people who do have the same role are almost certainly vanilla, which means the scum can use this info to kill off power roles.

I can safely say that my own role is different, though.

[Xdaamno]

It's rly awkward that ryan voted me without any explanation.

Didn't anyone notice that?

... Can you clarify whether you're joking or not?

[Sammich]

... Can you clarify whether you're joking or not?

Not joking.

[kabenon007]

kabenon, Waterboywaldo (how should I shorten that name? Suggestions?) wasn't calling you singleminded, but hypocritical. I think his point was "at least I contributed my opinions, before you did by the way".

Why does it matter who contributed first?

[kabenon007]

EBWOP
His point was to systematically refute everything I had said. Which was pointless, because he went too far in depth. All I was commenting on was how he seemed to have the whole day planned already in lynching Max. Which I see he did not respond to...

[WaterboyWaldo]

Well, I did have the day planned around lynching Max. At least, until I became more suspicious of you.

[kabenon007]

See? Why would a townie have a day planned around lynching one person from the beginning? Stupid move to admit that Waldo. Only scum plan a day around lynching one person.

[WaterboyWaldo]

Why would a townie have a day planned around lynching one person from the beginning?

Because that one person had been suspicious from the beginning. Durr.

[kabenon007]

Yes... but you are not taking into account any leeway whatsoever. What if he were to suddenly claim? Would you keep your vote on him then?

[kabenon007]

EBWOP: Durr.

[WaterboyWaldo]

If that were the case, then my plans would change, much in the same way that they DID change when you became more suspicious.