MissTerry, please respond to this:
In post 107, Harkonnen97 wrote:MissTerry, if your vote on me is no longer random, could you please give your reasoning behind it?
In post 107, Harkonnen97 wrote:MissTerry, if your vote on me is no longer random, could you please give your reasoning behind it?
Those comments, save one, are in chronological order of my read - the townish comment was on Page 1, he started to slide after that.In post 174, Harkonnen97 wrote:Why are you voting for Loopdan if you believe he is townish?
L-3 I believe, since Creature unvoted, but I may have missed one and maybe he's at L-2.In post 174, Harkonnen97 wrote:Also, that's quite a few votes on him already. I think he's at L-2?
My bad. I thought that you were talking about Loopdan's post here, not Creature.In post 173, Thor665 wrote:In post 144, Loopdan wrote:When Thor (or whoever fills his slot) finally shows up he needs to give his read on Creature. I will not move my vote until this happens.
Currently townish, but I'd like to see him field my questions to him.
@Thor-- Why no explanation on your vote? What led you to change your early read of me from town to scum?In post 176, Thor665 wrote:Those comments, save one, are in chronological order of my read - the townish comment was on Page 1, he started to slide after that.In post 174, Harkonnen97 wrote:Why are you voting for Loopdan if you believe he is townish?
L-3 I believe, since Creature unvoted, but I may have missed one and maybe he's at L-2.In post 174, Harkonnen97 wrote:Also, that's quite a few votes on him already. I think he's at L-2?
Answer to what? If you mean my read on Creature, I'm null.In post 173, Thor665 wrote:In post 144, Loopdan wrote:When Thor (or whoever fills his slot) finally shows up he needs to give his read on Creature. I will not move my vote until this happens.
Currently townish, but I'd like to see him field my questions to him.
I look forward to your answer too.
If I explained why you are scum would you ever agree with me? Don't really see the point.In post 178, Loopdan wrote:@Thor-- Why no explanation on your vote? What led you to change your early read of me from town to scum?
Not that, I actually asked you and Hark a question, but apparently put it inside a quote so it was harder to spot - so here they are again.In post 179, Loopdan wrote:Answer to what? If you mean my read on Creature, I'm null.In post 173, Thor665 wrote:In post 144, Loopdan wrote:When Thor (or whoever fills his slot) finally shows up he needs to give his read on Creature. I will not move my vote until this happens.
Currently townish, but I'd like to see him field my questions to him.
I look forward to your answer too.
You also didn't answer the question that wasn't clogged up in quotes when I asked you about how your playstyle was easy to read.In post 173, Thor665 wrote:@Hark - if I'm scum because my scumbuddy is distancing from me, why aren't you voting my scumbuddy? For me to be scum doesn't it require him to be scum? So, basically you're voting the less likely of the two of us to be scum...?
@Loop - if I'm scum because my scumbuddy is bussing me over awareness of my impending lurk early, why aren't you voting my scumbuddy? For me to be scum doesn't it require him to be scum? So, basically you're voting the less likely of the two of us to be scum...?
Your explanation can help me sortIn post 180, Thor665 wrote:If I explained why you are scum would you ever agree with me? Don't really see the point.In post 178, Loopdan wrote:@Thor-- Why no explanation on your vote? What led you to change your early read of me from town to scum?
You have a point here about scum hunting. I felt engaged in the game at the beginning, but it's frustrating that there really isn't anything to work off of at this point, other than everyone's reactions to your lurking.In post 180, Thor665 wrote: I changed my read on you from town to scum because though you opened kind of nicely with actual scumhunting but then shifted to saying a whole lot of nothing and also advancing nothing. At this point I feel like you're actively trying not to advance anything - just coasting.
Creature actually asked me earlier about who I thought was scummier. I said my vote was on you, but gave no reason. It was because you weren't here. And I disagree that Creature must be scum for you to be scum.In post 180, Thor665 wrote:Not that, I actually asked you and Hark a question, but apparently put it inside a quote so it was harder to spot - so here they are again.In post 179, Loopdan wrote:Answer to what? If you mean my read on Creature, I'm null.In post 173, Thor665 wrote:In post 144, Loopdan wrote:When Thor (or whoever fills his slot) finally shows up he needs to give his read on Creature. I will not move my vote until this happens.
Currently townish, but I'd like to see him field my questions to him.
I look forward to your answer too.
In post 173, Thor665 wrote:@Hark - if I'm scum because my scumbuddy is distancing from me, why aren't you voting my scumbuddy? For me to be scum doesn't it require him to be scum? So, basically you're voting the less likely of the two of us to be scum...?
@Loop - if I'm scum because my scumbuddy is bussing me over awareness of my impending lurk early, why aren't you voting my scumbuddy? For me to be scum doesn't it require him to be scum? So, basically you're voting the less likely of the two of us to be scum...?
I guess everybody thinks they should be easy to read as town. In my other game I was pushed pretty hard most of Day 1 (I was put at L-1 twice), but survived and made it the rest of the game as universally town-read by all but scum.In post 180, Thor665 wrote: You also didn't answer the question that wasn't clogged up in quotes when I asked you about how your playstyle was easy to read.
Try to interact the less possible with my scum buddy (even if I try the opposite).In post 173, Thor665 wrote:What is your usual scum/scum interaction habit?
If someone calls you out for lurking and you do that intentionally, is there any way you can be town?if I'm scum because my scumbuddy is distancing from me, why aren't you voting my scumbuddy? For me to be scum doesn't it require him to be scum? So, basically you're voting the less likely of the two of us to be scum...?
His vote was RVS and he didn't seem to have intent to pressure Hark when he cast his vote. 52 can't be considered pressure post.I don't follow - he was voting Hark.
I saw you posting in another game in this same subforum.How do you know I noticed?
Be less readable, give less info, and when everybody is set to lynch you, you ask this.why would I do it as scum.
Sometimes being active as town but not as scum can be a good evidence.But, that said, have you any evidence that suggests I lurk as scum?
I don't think you would flake out, but I usually see scum flaking out.What about flake as scum?
Lurking is scummy.Clarify?
I mean, did you notice the daystart PM?No, I used magic to sense the prod happening.In post 166, Creature wrote:Did you check your inbox?
Not if I think you're scum.In post 181, Loopdan wrote:Your explanation can help me sortIn post 180, Thor665 wrote:If I explained why you are scum would you ever agree with me? Don't really see the point.In post 178, Loopdan wrote:@Thor-- Why no explanation on your vote? What led you to change your early read of me from town to scum?you. And there has to be value in that for town!Thor.
There isn't anything to work on because people aren't advancing reads.In post 181, Loopdan wrote:You have a point here about scum hunting. I felt engaged in the game at the beginning, but it's frustrating that there really isn't anything to work off of at this point, other than everyone's reactions to your lurking.
Can you explain your scum case on me that doesn't require Creature to be scum?In post 181, Loopdan wrote:Creature actually asked me earlier about who I thought was scummier. I said my vote was on you, but gave no reason. It was because you weren't here. And I disagree that Creature must be scum for you to be scum.
Okay...but so far your offered thoughts on this are that you have no idea how you'd look as scum, and also that, as scum, you'd look just like you do as town.In post 181, Loopdan wrote:I guess everybody thinks they should be easy to read as town. In my other game I was pushed pretty hard most of Day 1 (I was put at L-1 twice), but survived and made it the rest of the game as universally town-read by all but scum.
You only had one scum read at all?In post 181, Loopdan wrote:But I don't really know where to go from here.
In post 136, lucca261 wrote:I don't like how all Blank posts are all about Thor/Creature, also, I have some other reasons to vote him, also.
@hark: It's just that you vote do nothing while it's parked on Thor. You're not pressuring anyone, it's just there, waiting to see if Thor will show up. Nothing else about my post?
@loop: I actually checked your ISO before asking. The only time you referenced Hark after your unvote was #90. On #90, it was unclear to me.
Bah, I wrote a post before and it didn't post, ick.In post 160, Harkonnen97 wrote:I don't see him saying "hey guise, i'm not mafia, townread me plz!!!!!!"In post 157, MissTerry wrote:This is the post that bothers me, a direct claim of not mafia. I don't see the purpose of this kind of a post from town.In post 64, Loopdan wrote:I'm easy to figure out. When I'm town, I get very involved and scum-hunt while somehow managing to look slightly scummy. When I'm scum... I don't know, because I've never been scum.In post 54, Harkonnen97 wrote:Loop and Creature, I don't really understand you ;-;
All I see is him sharing his own meta to us (which I respectfully throw out the window, because meta is stupid.)
Really don't understand why you and Penguin are scumreading #64.
When I said my vote was not random it was because now I kept it on you as a placeholder. I am townreading you at the moment and kept the vote on you so I could keep watching loopdan, who is who I suspect.Harkonnen97 wrote:Nvm, I think he's at L-3.
MissTerry, please respond to this:In post 107, Harkonnen97 wrote:MissTerry, if your vote on me is no longer random, could you please give your reasoning behind it?
I fail to follow this - pretty much if you're not claiming town then you're claiming scum, which is an even worse claim whether or not you want to help town.In post 184, MissTerry wrote:By saying that he's never played scum he is saying that he is not scum and therefore is town, not a wise claim to make in my opinion if you want to stay alive and help the town.
Iso is an abbreviation for "isolation" it generally is used to reference the Iso function this forum has that allows you to look at just a single player's posts (or, sexily, any given number of players while cutting out the rest of the game)In post 184, MissTerry wrote:Questions, what is ISO and how do you quote only part of a post?
@Creature - I do actually only ask questions just to hear my smooth Morgan Freeman like voice as I read my posts back to myself - but, as long as you're town reading me, why not respond to the questions I asked you?In post 173, Thor665 wrote:What is your usual scum/scum interaction habit?In post 27, Creature wrote:Then you never saw me playing scum.In post 24, Harkonnen97 wrote:Also, I have this gut feeling that Creature is trying to distance from his scumbuddy Thor.
How do you know I noticed?In post 106, Creature wrote:Yes, because I know he at least noticed and could post something in the thread. Also, I won't refrain lynching lurkers because I met town lurkers in the past.In post 105, Draynth wrote:Wait, so the IC's that have been inactive in your games in the past were town, but you find Thor to be scummy for the same reason?
Because...well...I didn't. I'm one o fthe most active posters on the entire site, and even a casual glance at my gaes would show this - so why do you think I would;
1. Be fully aware of the game.
2. Decide not to address it in any way at all.
3. Only do that as scum.
Again - why would I do it as scum.In post 148, Creature wrote:I wouldn't drop my suspicion on Thor's slot, he's posting elsewhere, why would he flake out like this?
I mean, I can grasp that you're like "THor is posting elsewhere!" and that I'm not doing it at all here is kind of odd.
But, that said, have you any evidence that suggests I lurk as scum?
What about flake as scum?
I understand your read and your issue - but nothing seems to connect them.
Clarify?
Sure - maybe I'm a lurker and scum are opting for an easy/lazy mislynch since I'll never be there to defend myself and everyone can agree lurking is scummy.In post 182, Creature wrote:If someone calls you out for lurking and you do that intentionally, is there any way you can be town?if I'm scum because my scumbuddy is distancing from me, why aren't you voting my scumbuddy? For me to be scum doesn't it require him to be scum? So, basically you're voting the less likely of the two of us to be scum...?
So you don't think naked votes can cause pressure?In post 182, Creature wrote:His vote was RVS and he didn't seem to have intent to pressure Hark when he cast his vote. 52 can't be considered pressure post.
How does that mean I noticed? I don't even go to the subforum pages.In post 182, Creature wrote:I saw you posting in another game in this same subforum.How do you know I noticed?
Agreed - did you have any evidence that I do that?In post 182, Creature wrote:Sometimes being active as town but not as scum can be a good evidence.But, that said, have you any evidence that suggests I lurk as scum?
Agreed - but to lurk you actually have to, y'know, be posting in the game and avoiding giving content.
It wasn't listed as a new PM today, so I must have opened my inbox after getting it, but it was unopened today, so I must not have opened it.In post 182, Creature wrote:I mean, did you notice the daystart PM?
I'lll give you Draynth and Blank...how do you figure me?In post 189, Creature wrote:Draynth, Blank and Penguin are doing a good job going under the radar.
This seems like a copout to me. We're 25% through Day 1...it's still early in the game for you to have lost that engagement. I do think that everyone needs to let go of the "lurking" on Thor's part, though. I think he has reasonably explained it, and now we can move on to something else.In post 181, Loopdan wrote:You have a point here about scum hunting. I felt engaged in the game at the beginning, but it's frustrating that there really isn't anything to work off of at this point, other than everyone's reactions to your lurking.
I mean "intentionally"In post 196, Thor665 wrote:Sure - maybe I'm a lurker and scum are opting for an easy/lazy mislynch since I'll never be there to defend myself and everyone can agree lurking is scummy.In post 182, Creature wrote:If someone calls you out for lurking and you do that intentionally, is there any way you can be town?if I'm scum because my scumbuddy is distancing from me, why aren't you voting my scumbuddy? For me to be scum doesn't it require him to be scum? So, basically you're voting the less likely of the two of us to be scum...?
Not that I was actually lurking - I was just not posting.
He pointed his vote was RVS when Hark questioned why he was voting him. Then he said it was actually pressure when I questioned post 52.So you don't think naked votes can cause pressure?In post 182, Creature wrote:His vote was RVS and he didn't seem to have intent to pressure Hark when he cast his vote. 52 can't be considered pressure post.
I do.
Why don't you?
That's sad, but I usually go or end up going.How does that mean I noticed? I don't even go to the subforum pages.In post 182, Creature wrote:I saw you posting in another game in this same subforum.How do you know I noticed?
I feel you're more active in games you're town.Agreed - did you have any evidence that I do that?In post 182, Creature wrote:Sometimes being active as town but not as scum can be a good evidence.But, that said, have you any evidence that suggests I lurk as scum?
Or stay idle until the prod comes.Agreed - but to lurk you actually have to, y'know, be posting in the game and avoiding giving content.
Acting like the game doesn't exist seems to suggest...not being aware the game existed.
So you don't check your inbox? How do you confirm your role?It wasn't listed as a new PM today, so I must have opened my inbox after getting it, but it was unopened today, so I must not have opened it.In post 182, Creature wrote:I mean, did you notice the daystart PM?
Probably I say it was a Day start announcement and didn't open it, because I never really open those as I find them meaningless since I Bookmark all my games and that's how I access them.
It was an issue this time because the game wasn't already in my Bookmarks.
Even a casual look at my posting habits (which you kind of claim to have done, since you were tracking my activity) would show I tend to be a very active poster in games regardless of alignment, and have never been replaced out of a game, and barely have ever received a prod (in fact, I think this was my first one ever in a Newbie).
But I still don't understand how you didn't notice this game.What that says to me is you actually didn't care to investigate enough to actually learn why I wasn't posting.
You were just attacking my slot over something that meant nothing as far as alignment goes.
Which would make you scum.
Thoughts?