pwayne66 wrote:Mastermind of Sin - Scum. He jumped back on my radar. Yesterday, immediately after a bandwagon against Flameaxe started, he changed his stance to go after a very popular choice, Kakeng ( a diversion?).
Pretty sure I didn't "change" my mind. I never thought Kakeng was protown. I gave him a chance to contribute, and he didn't, so I got him lynched. He didn't even defend himself after he was pressured. I thought he was hoping to lurk past the pressure. When he finally spoke up, he only gave a claim and nothing else worth mentioning. That had all the trademarks of scum. I fail to see what I've done wrong here other than being mistaken in my assessment. But hindsight is 20/20.
This occurred after he passionately defended the call to get a role claim (so much so he voted for tyhess for disagreeing with him). So what's the point of getting a role claim if your going to kill a power role anyway?
Now you're misrepresenting me. Why must you twist what I say? I never said we would kill every power role that claims. That would be dumb. I said that the particular power role that he claimed,
in addition to his actions
, indicated that his claim was just a scum trying to survive an extra day.
He then goes on to defend Flameaxe's absence (he also defended Flameaxe in his first few posts. Oman called him out on it. This is when MoS famously decided to stop answering questions in order to flush out scum.) Today he lists flameaxe as scummy with no explanation (distancing?).
Wow. Just because I'm actually friends with Flameaxe and I *know* that he's had midterms for a while does not mean I am defending him. I suspect him, too, but I'm not going to make unreasonable accusations against him such as calling him scum for not posting when he was swamped with midterms. That's ridiculous.
I didn't give an explanation for anyone. I even
TOLD
you that I was just listing this off the top of my head without a reread or anything, and you
still
attack me for not providing reasoning? That's asinine, pwayne. You're better than that.