your offense on him is a bit too sticky. I'm with Jake on this one PALIn post 898, Dunnstral wrote:Zakk just said he didn't get his role and zachstral is literally blindly defending him regardless
I'll stop talking and see where this winds up
your offense on him is a bit too sticky. I'm with Jake on this one PALIn post 898, Dunnstral wrote:Zakk just said he didn't get his role and zachstral is literally blindly defending him regardless
In post 888, zakk wrote:@mod: you never sent me floofs role pm. Please confirm in thread that up until now I've had no idea what my role or alignment is.
Zulfy wrote:In post 888, zakk wrote:@mod: you never sent me floofs role pm. Please confirm in thread that up until now I've had no idea what my role or alignment is.confirmed
[I do not see what makes Zachstralkita's RVS vote as one of the worst posts, it's RVS. However, here is heuristically_alone calling Zachstralkita's reason for scum-reading DunnstralIn post 122, Zachstralkita wrote:None of you see it. I FUCKING SEE IT. This isn't Dunn being town, it's him trying to look like he's being town.
I'd bet one of my body parts on Dunn flipping scum if I.... had enough of those to lose
It felt like fake scum-hunting (a question with no real purpose/direction). This was fake pressure on Zachstralkita's slot so a possible heuristically_alone-Zachstralkita association here.In post 265, heuristically_alone wrote:@Zach, are you mafia?
It echoes the theme that iraonavp was painting that I was not contributing any original content/fake scum-hunting/asking no-answer questions. My frustration for both iraonavp/heuristically_alone and negative feelings for their line of thought was part OMGUS-fueled, part confirmation-bias. I felt like scum had found their target to push with an unsupported scum case [with the added bonus of Dunnstral (who was being mass-town-read) suspicious of me too]. iraonavp flipped town so the picture is clear now: it was a townie's bad scum-case on a townie, then scum opportunistically sheeped/jumped onto the pressure.In post 268, heuristically_alone wrote:Because literally every post he has made has been completely useless. Up to this point, he had only joined in post 55 voting Jack as mafia (a surprisingly large amount of people immediately read Jack as mafia or town based off of his simple post 13)
Then immediately in posts 56-58 and 79-81 just quotes what others are saying and maybe asks follow up questions without literally given up anything original on his own. The only other posts he has made are 204-206 and 222, all of which he does the exact same thing. Just quoting others and giving a quick comment, but absolutely saying nothing original or doing nothing to help the game. 205 unvotes Jack, but that's that.
[This looks like heuristically_alone throwing together any weak reason to town-read Dunnstral. Yeah, liking Dunnstral alot now. I don't think scum would hard-town read their scum-partner without tangible reasons that early on Day 1.]In post 268, heuristically_alone wrote:@Dunnstral has been by far the most entertaining player for me to follow in this game so far. As for liking him, makes me want him to be town. Best proof I have of you being town is your response to post 34 by xyzzy.
In post 34, xyzzy wrote:Dunnsrtal, can you offer any explanation for your behavior in this game so far?In post 35, Dunnstral wrote:Probably not
It was quite answered in a joking manner, but I think a mafia would have tried to give a more in depth explanation to his process in attempts to conceal himself.
I actually agree with your analysis of the post H_A made.In post 736, Dunnstral wrote:I think that at least one of bins/floof is mafia - that interaction makes it more likely for me but they were also individually scummy (thinking more so bins here)
VOTE: Bins
This is bugging me.In post 265, heuristically_alone wrote:@Zach, are you mafia?
Who guranteed it?In post 871, Zachstralkita wrote:HEY HE GUARANTEED IT MAN YOU KNOW GUARANTEES ARE ALWAY S RIGHT
In post 913, Bins wrote:It's funny cause I was townreading zakk's reaction.
In post 917, Jake from State Farm wrote:Who guranteed it?In post 871, Zachstralkita wrote:HEY HE GUARANTEED IT MAN YOU KNOW GUARANTEES ARE ALWAY S RIGHT
Let me crack the case. He was trying to look town.Bins wrote:This is bugging me.In post 265, heuristically_alone wrote:@Zach, are you mafia?
And yet another example of why Dunn is scumIn post 897, Zachstralkita wrote:Also that's a pretty ballsy and stupid move. He directly asked the mod to confirm it and you'd imply he's gambiting, Dunn?
In post 921, Jake from State Farm wrote:And yet another example of why Dunn is scumIn post 897, Zachstralkita wrote:Also that's a pretty ballsy and stupid move. He directly asked the mod to confirm it and you'd imply he's gambiting, Dunn?
Cmon bro he didn't have a role pm. There no way this post comes from town. Criticizing a player for not doing anything when he didn't even have a role pm is just a cheap shot.In post 910, Dunnstral wrote:We need zachstral in here to tell us zakk is town while zakk does nothing
In post 892, Dunnstral wrote:So you're argueing without even knowing your role? So your argument means nothing either way and you're ignorable. Also really slimy tactic to pull too
These imply you think he's gambiting especially the second one. You owe the man a fucking apology and you need to stfu and let him catch up.In post 893, Dunnstral wrote:Any chance of me thinking you're town is gone now