Boy oh boy aren'tIn post 1697, Titus wrote:In post 1694, Ircher wrote:So, whats the chances of the claim being true?
5% and that's because site meta loves stupidity and lurking lately and punishes minority views for existing
~Nahdia
Boy oh boy aren'tIn post 1697, Titus wrote:In post 1694, Ircher wrote:So, whats the chances of the claim being true?
5% and that's because site meta loves stupidity and lurking lately and punishes minority views for existing
In post 1697, Titus wrote:In post 1694, Ircher wrote:So, whats the chances of the claim being true?
5% and that's because site meta loves stupidity and lurking lately and punishes minority views for existing
In post 1698, androgybee wrote:An accurate summary of my townplay is a very long string of OMUGS's. I'm often right though ^_~
~Nahdia
We thought we were a tracker until midday today, when Beeboy realized our role PM actually details a Watcher role despite being detailed as Tracker. After contacting Ether, she made the decision that we were unfortunately going to stay as a tracker since that's the result she gave and that's how we were playing up until then. We're not sure if Yimmy meant for us to be a watcher or a tracker in reality, and I assume Ether isn't really sure either.In post 1699, Titus wrote:In post 1696, androgybee wrote:We did not think we were a watcher. You must not have been reading very closely on your catch up, please try again.In post 1693, Titus wrote:In post 1647, androgybee wrote:Well I mean, I hate to use a mod error to towntell but if we're a scum tracker, why track Ranger? and if we didn't actually target Ranger, why not out our real, probably more useful result?
~Nahdia
Yeah, there was likely no mixup. You said in your Skype chat you tracked Ranger out of fear, but now we're supposed to think you thought you were a watcher? Regardless this mystical error got cleared up by the time you picked your night action, so what's the relevance other than trying to fake a town tell?
If you tracked someone other than Ranger, outing them confirms a townie.
~Nahdia
What is this bullshit then?
Uh, pisskop wasn't scumreading me in Zelda. SirCakez was. Remember who I lynched?In post 1703, Titus wrote:In post 1698, androgybee wrote:An accurate summary of my townplay is a very long string of OMUGS's. I'm often right though ^_~
~Nahdia
None of this is true. You're likely scum and your lylo play was off in Zelda. You didn't even consider Pisskop.
In post 1701, RadiantCowbells wrote:In post 1697, Titus wrote:In post 1694, Ircher wrote:So, whats the chances of the claim being true?
5% and that's because site meta loves stupidity and lurking lately and punishes minority views for existing
Why is it when I expressed these views in Open 620 you disagreed with me >.>
In post 1706, androgybee wrote:Uh, pisskop wasn't scumreading me in Zelda. SirCakez was. Remember who I lynched?In post 1703, Titus wrote:In post 1698, androgybee wrote:An accurate summary of my townplay is a very long string of OMUGS's. I'm often right though ^_~
~Nahdia
None of this is true. You're likely scum and your lylo play was off in Zelda. You didn't even consider Pisskop.
~Nahdia
Assuming you're referring to the error in the roel PM, beeboy brought it up as soon as he noticed it, before we got a response from Ether.In post 1709, Ircher wrote:And, yet you brought it up in thread as an attempt at towncred?
I do what I have to to avoid getting lynched. I do not like to get lynched. I did tell you I'm very hard to lynch.In post 1710, RadiantCowbells wrote:I don't.
I believe that Nahdia would be willing to AtE excessively and pull out dumb shit like the claim change specifically because it's against me.
I'm not?RadiantCowbells wrote:I don't like how Nahdia's treating Titus like she's town now.
In post 1708, androgybee wrote:Titus are you OK? You seem to having some memory issues.
OK, are you yelling at me for past failures or are you trying to make a point about this game? Currently it seems like the former. I'm happy to talk about my logic during Zelda mafia if you want but this seems like not really the place...................In post 1717, Titus wrote:In post 1708, androgybee wrote:Titus are you OK? You seem to having some memory issues.
No. I remember that game well. Pisskop and Dave's to made that game about likability instead of logic and consistent emotional play and you fell for it after me stating REPEATEDLY that's their scum MO AND getting night killed. You decided you were going to decide based on feels.
I resent the feels.