In post 1196, Gorkington wrote:maruchan.
can you provide an example or two of someone that youve played with who, as scum, did some of the things youre saying are scummy about ircher's play?
No actually I can't, becuase I had to wait 30 minutes for the 20+ pages of new posts to load for me to catch up in THIS game alone, without even ATTEMPTING to try to metadive my past however-thr-fuck-bignumber-many-games for you. And I haven't played games seriously in years so none of them are fresh in my memory.
In post 1209, Iecerint wrote:In post 1195, Maruchan wrote:@Iece, I'm not interpreting anything. I am literally showing a chronological analysis of ircher's "reads" on a SINGLE playerslot, that are flipflopping more than a dying fish. I didn't interpret them in any which way. I just pointed it out, so that it was blatantly obvious to everyone else.
I don't do team-hunting. Nothing of ircher's play only makes him look scummy IF someone else is also scum. Ircher is independantly scummy on his own.
You are saying "Ircher did weird stuff; ergo he is scum."
I agree with you that you can read the read changes and think "That is weird stuff."
However, consider WHY Ircher would do what he did if both slots were town.
It would make LESS sense, right? Even though it's weird regardless.
Let me know if I am wrong about this by explaining it to me.
Uhm. Exactly this? his actions make less sense if they are both town than if irhcer is scum. Exactly my point. O.o I'm glad you understand? Ircher-as-town has no reason to be inconsistent with his reads, as they are genuine and can therefore be genuinely traces (like everyone town readign me is saying, while they don't agree with my analysis of what makes my scumreads scummy, they can see that I genuinely am legitimately trying to build cases, and am being consistent in what shit i find scummy, therfeore, my reads while they may be wrong, feel genuine to them) Ircher doesn't have that. He's flip-floping his reads every other post as he gets put on the defensive for something he says/does and is flailing. Scum can be inconsistent with their "reads" becasue they have no reads. they know who is scum and who is town, and that's that.
This was kinda opportunistic btw RC. Voted me without any reason or making any comments on yoru read of me, and last i read I thought you had me in on leaning-town mostly null, so this seems even more opportunistic. Care to explain it any more in depth?
In post 1426, androgybee wrote:I got a message last night with a song that was titled Mincs and Boo.
There are Tracker, and there are Rolecops in Plotinus' roles (what beeboy claimed, and what nahdia breadcrumbed, respectively), but there is NOTHING to do with anything remotely resembling music vendor or wahtever.
I call BS
In post 1470, Gorkington wrote:obvscum.
while saying not confident.
ugh.
i really want maru and iece and fire and ari to fully react to all of this.
but fucking hell i really want this flip.
I have no reaction as of this post, just a whole lot of nothing but bickering going on in real-time causign 20+ pages of catchup, except Titus is likely town (the Outraged!Town titus emotion seems genuine). But then again, I *DID* just have to sit through 20+ pages of bullshit, and i was kind of speed reading it because it bores me.
In post 1660, RadiantCowbells wrote:There's plenty of way Ether can answer this question.
If she gave someone the wrong role the least she can do is say 'Hey, ~unspecified~ error was made interpreting the Role PMs.'
That confirms no one as town.
The mod would not come in in the middle of a fucking in-thread discussion about mod errors B YA SINGLE PLAYER, and confirm that ~unspecified player~ had an error in their role PM. Are you fucking dense? If onyl ONE PLAYER is ACTIVELY DISCUSSIGN a problem with their role PM ,and the mod said "HEY GUYS SOME RANDOM ONE PERSON HAD FUCKED UP ROLE PM", that's kinda fucking obvious.