Mini 1783: GTA 2 Mafia (GaME OVAH)

[TheDominator37]

Yeah, okay, past page 20.

We're definitely not lynching Ranger today, and that's final.

Can you like have any reason. At all? Or are you just trying to make as much crap up as you can?

[TheDominator37]

You dont lynch someone just cuz they have a string scum game. Ranger has an equally strong town game, so your point is?

Jeanne was scummy for lurking, generally, I'd like to PL any lurking slots. But, the slot claimed watcher -- not lynching a potentially useful role that is also a very powerful player D1.

So we should PL half the game? Good idea

[Ircher]

Can you not freaking read a readlist???? That has been quoted thrice by now????

[Ircher]

You dont lynch someone just cuz they have a string scum game. Ranger has an equally strong town game, so your point is?

Jeanne was scummy for lurking, generally, I'd like to PL any lurking slots. But, the slot claimed watcher -- not lynching a potentially useful role that is also a very powerful player D1.

So we should PL half the game? Good idea

To clarify: Those who are doing extensive lurking: FA and Masq rn.

But, why are you guys being so keen on spotting the "slightest" flaw. And am I pushing for a PL roght now? I dont think so.

[TheDominator37]

Spoiler: Reads

Confirmed Town

(From my perspective) (98%-100% Confidence)
Ircher  (100%) - Role PM

Likely Town

(85%-97% Confidence)
Ranger (93%) - Claim timing was unwarranted. Lurking != Scum, so I can excuse Jeanne's play. Ranger has done a good deal of scumhunting having replaced in, so therefore, I'm leaning town. Finally, all the reasons to lynch her are either very weak or just plain stupid. We are not lynching this slot D1. I might reconsider D2, but we're not lynching the scumhunting, logical, un-counterclaimed watcher.
Dragon (91%) - I have no reason to townread this slot aside from the claim which I still think was easy to make and very survivalistic and the fact that I think they truly believe that Ranger is scum, despite their awful reasoning. Motive IS a tell, and this slot seems to have the town motive and doing stuff typical of being town, so that's why a townread despite all odds.
Polar (90%) - Next to Ranger, I really like this slot... a lot. Scumhunting, using logical and rationale thought, and keeping an open perspective that is less prone to bias. Definitely wouldn't lynch this slot D1. Also, reminder that this slot claimed to be ascetic.

Leaning Town

(60%-84% Confidence)
BBT (83%) - Meta tell. Last time I played with this slot, he was just as "lazy", biased, and in general, doing things at his own pace the way he wanted. He was town that game, so probably same here. Would like more though.
Banter (75%) - This slot is okay. Few quelms early game, but overall, they seem to be fine. Would note that their activity has dropped recently though.

Null

(0% - 30% Confidence; No/Very Weak Read)
Masq (0%) - Pls post more and stop lurking.
FA_Q2 (0%) - Earlier said 3rd pick -- Forgot about code when I said that. This slot also needs to stop lurking.

Neutral

(31%-59% Confidence; Mixed Read)
Black (+55%) - Some... interesting things from this slot early game. Feel like the slot was being genuine with his reactions, but haven't seen too much effort to find scum.
Dom (+35%) - I'll state that this slot seems to be active lurking right now, and isn't being useful. Nonetheless, I'm inclined to err on the side of town cuz of early game.
Code (-45%) - This slot is barely doing anything and rather disappointing. The few things they have done read as more likely to have a scum motive than a town one. Still, not top priority right now.

Leaning Scum

(60%-75% Confidence)
Scourge (-60%) - This slot is also not really contributing and tbh, I feel that the few times they have contributed, it was always after the weakest links they could break with minimal suspicion being cast.

Likely Scum

(76%-100% Confidence)
Magna (-90%) - Like Dragon, insists on lynching Ranger. Unlike Dragon, unwilling to compromise for nothing, not committed to aforementioned read (didnt vote for at least 10 pages despite constantly bring it up), and busy searching for stupid reasons to scumread Ranger for. And said reasons are worse than Dragon's as they have ZERO evidence backing them.

I am scum for the same reason masq is null...

[Code of Honor]

Ircher, saying the phrase "scumhunting" is a vacuum buzzword. It means nothing. As for addressing a Ranger wall, I cannot see it. You haven't elaborated on why Ranger's town at all. Even now, your position is Ranger or Magua must die. Yet, rather than address why those MUST be the lynches for today, you're just discrediting my observations on you. You don't defend why Ranger is a viable wagon to you despite being a top townread or why Magua is a good scumread.

If you think Magua is such a good scumread, why are you placing zero effort to lynch her?

If you think Ranger is town, why do you leave Ranger as a viable wagon despite being supposedly against their lynch today?

~Titus

[Ircher]

Nope, you read it wrong. For the neutral and null reads, you gotta pay attn to the sign at the beginning. Your on town side cuz of your ealy-game play.

[Ircher]

Ircher, saying the phrase "scumhunting" is a vacuum buzzword. It means nothing. As for addressing a Ranger wall, I cannot see it. You haven't elaborated on why Ranger's town at all. Even now, your position is Ranger or Magua must die. Yet, rather than address why those MUST be the lynches for today, you're just discrediting my observations on you. You don't defend why Ranger is a viable wagon to you despite being a top townread or why Magua is a good scumread.

If you think Magua is such a good scumread, why are you placing zero effort to lynch her?

If you think Ranger is town, why do you leave Ranger as a viable wagon despite being supposedly against their lynch today?

~Titus

I said Magna wall illustratong why all the points against Ranger are rather void and poor.

[TheDominator37]

You dont lynch someone just cuz they have a string scum game. Ranger has an equally strong town game, so your point is?

Jeanne was scummy for lurking, generally, I'd like to PL any lurking slots. But, the slot claimed watcher -- not lynching a potentially useful role that is also a very powerful player D1.

So we should PL half the game? Good idea

To clarify: Those who are doing extensive lurking: FA and Masq rn.

But, why are you guys being so keen on spotting the "slightest" flaw. And am I pushing for a PL roght now? I dont think so.

Oh you just want to lynch people because they disagree with you. My bad.

[Ircher]

As to viable wagons: Not my choice, ask all the people voting Ranger why thats the case. Magna and Dragon seem intent on the Ranger lynch; Ask them

[Ircher]

You dont lynch someone just cuz they have a string scum game. Ranger has an equally strong town game, so your point is?

Jeanne was scummy for lurking, generally, I'd like to PL any lurking slots. But, the slot claimed watcher -- not lynching a potentially useful role that is also a very powerful player D1.

So we should PL half the game? Good idea

To clarify: Those who are doing extensive lurking: FA and Masq rn.

But, why are you guys being so keen on spotting the "slightest" flaw. And am I pushing for a PL roght now? I dont think so.

Oh you just want to lynch people because they disagree with you. My bad.

Stop with the sarcasm. Ive yet to express a scumread on you... Dont make me change my mind.

[Ircher]

Your the same person who claimed I was your alt. I dont have time to put up with you.

[Code of Honor]

Ircher, saying the phrase "scumhunting" is a vacuum buzzword. It means nothing. As for addressing a Ranger wall, I cannot see it. You haven't elaborated on why Ranger's town at all. Even now, your position is Ranger or Magua must die. Yet, rather than address why those MUST be the lynches for today, you're just discrediting my observations on you. You don't defend why Ranger is a viable wagon to you despite being a top townread or why Magua is a good scumread.

If you think Magua is such a good scumread, why are you placing zero effort to lynch her?

If you think Ranger is town, why do you leave Ranger as a viable wagon despite being supposedly against their lynch today?

~Titus

I said Magna wall illustratong why all the points against Ranger are rather void and poor.

So that doesn't argue that Magua is scum, just wrong. Wrong =/= scum. Explain how Magua is scum.

[TheDominator37]

You dont lynch someone just cuz they have a string scum game. Ranger has an equally strong town game, so your point is?

Jeanne was scummy for lurking, generally, I'd like to PL any lurking slots. But, the slot claimed watcher -- not lynching a potentially useful role that is also a very powerful player D1.

So we should PL half the game? Good idea

To clarify: Those who are doing extensive lurking: FA and Masq rn.

But, why are you guys being so keen on spotting the "slightest" flaw. And am I pushing for a PL roght now? I dont think so.

Oh you just want to lynch people because they disagree with you. My bad.

Stop with the sarcasm. Ive yet to express a scumread on you... Dont make me change my mind.

All the reasoning I've heard from you is my reads don't lead up with yours. They must be mafia

[Code of Honor]

As to viable wagons: Not my choice, ask all the people voting Ranger why thats the case. Magna and Dragon seem intent on the Ranger lynch; Ask them

So here you are passing the buck, even though you're scumreading Magua hard and not defending an alleged townread who would be very useful.

Die. Die. Die.

Join me people. Please.

~Titus

[Dragon Knight]

This is 100% scum!titus

[Ircher]

@Code
Just how far are you gonna go to try to misrep me?

Pedit: Yes, that's true, but the reasons that Magna has given seem to have some thought put into them, to make them look good, but when you examine them a bit closer, they're ridiculous. In other words, they are trying to push an easy lynch on Ranger.

Pedit2: @Dom - Just shut up if you cannot read, okay? You're not even trying to understand my perspective.

Pedit3: @Code - I cannot control other players opinions. It's nearly deadline; the only two who have a decent chance to be lynched are Magna and Ranger. I've akready expressed my views on the though I cannot argue with facts like that.

[Ircher]

Hey Titus, go do me a favor:

Go review Ice Cream Mafia (1769) and tell me if this does or does not resemble my play there. Ok, thanks!

[Code of Honor]

This is 100% scum!titus

Which head is this? Sign please. It will help me determine your alignment. Pretty sure FA and Ircher are scum, BBT, Polar, Ranger, Magua are town. So I would like to determine if you're dumb or scum.

[Ircher]

This is 100% scum!titus

Which head is this? Sign please. It will help me determine your alignment. Pretty sure FA and Ircher are scum, BBT, Polar, Ranger, Magua are town. So I would like to determine if you're dumb or scum.

Hey Titus, go do me a favor:

Go review Ice Cream Mafia (1769) and tell me if this does or does not resemble my play there. Ok, thanks!

[Ircher]

I'm leaning toward town Titus rn tbh though.... He was this way in Ice Cream Mafia too last time I remember

[The Banterlords]

oh today was titus?
VOTE: Code of Honor
Someone hasn't answered my question. >:3

pedit she and eh

[Ircher]

I'm leaning toward town Titus rn tbh though.... She was this way in Ice Cream Mafia too last time I remember

Stry, EBWOP

[Code of Honor]

Hey Titus, go do me a favor:

Go review Ice Cream Mafia (1769) and tell me if this does or does not resemble my play there. Ok, thanks!

Meta sucks.

*Forgot Black star in my last post. He's town too.

I'm done here. All you're going to do is spam the thread with why me bullshit.

~Titus

[Ircher]

@Banter
What's your thoughts on Magna?