In post 283, Lowell wrote:@knight, no, you're still scum, don't worry. but people have been persuaded by the brute force of the boringness of your arguments, so I'm moving to an easier, hopefully more hilarious, target.
In post 150, Sakura Hana wrote:Also i love how goodlord says this:
In post 122, Goodlordwill wrote:K, read (well, skimmed) everything, and every part of my gut and brain is screaming that knight is town.I will defend him not to the death, but at least to the slight inconvenience!
Yet he has said nothing about the people actually scumreading and voting him, but goes after someone that's no longer scumreading him.
How interesting.
In post 190, Sakura Hana wrote:I do wonder, do they not teach people in newbie games what a finger of suspicion is nowadays?
In post 201, Sayaka Maizono wrote:What is your logic behind assuming I would have laid out all my reasoning immediately?
In post 218, Boonskiies wrote:This is seriously all you fucking got about this? It's fucking easy to do this. Watch. What the hell do you want me to do? I gave you a fantastic unalignment indicative statement about why I will be fucking busy today, and now I'm taking up my time to do this. You're god damn welcome. It's page 9. Nothing has happened. I am known for being good AFTER information is revealed into this game. I am known to end days with a quick hammer, AS TOWN, so we can move on from nothingness and actually get to figuring out the game.
In post 250, Boonskiies wrote:@Chilled - What's your thought on Sakura?
@Almost - Same question.
@Sakura - how do you feel about Almost being the L-2 vote multiple times? What's your read on almost?
In post 260, knightmare wrote:It doesn't excuse them not doing anything else but following other's leads though. I don't see any scum hunting coming from their end.
In post 268, texcat wrote:Almost50 flipping town wouldn't really affect my read on Sakura. It would just mean that a flailing townie didn't vote her.
, Expedience
In post 292, Garmr wrote:Basically Texcat is lining up almost50 slot with sakura's then saying she would still push sakura after a town flip. This seems extremely suss to me as she early she was sheeping sakura's reasoning and pushing it. Also her entire case revolves around sakura being scum buddies with almost 50 yet she would continue pushing sakura despite supporting her actions and then she self defeats her first point.
In post 308, Boonskiies wrote:Ignored the case in general. Typical scum move; focus on something else.
In post 285, mhsmith0 wrote:In post 283, Lowell wrote:...And wagons on newbs are fun, anyway.
...
so I'm moving to an easier, hopefully more hilarious, target.
Serious vote or joke/reaction test? I'm assuming the latter for now. I dislike playing games with votes but whatever.
In post 287, Sakura Hana wrote:In post 278, Lowell wrote:Stop asking questions: vote mhsmith. I promise it'll get hilarious as we get close to lynch. I can tell he's the type.
What the heck? Stop asking questions and just vote? deadline is in a little less than 2 weeks, why would we rush a lynch when there's still lots of discussion to be had, for instance, the lack of your explanation for anything?
In post 291, Expedience wrote:What do you think of Sakura, Lowell? You're not weirded out at all by her backing off of knightmare?
In post 297, Expedience wrote:In post 210, chilledtea wrote:Oh man.
Boon is scum, lowell is prob scum and madonna is prob scum too. Although madonna is a slight read.
Can we just decide on one of these. I would go for boon though.
Sounds pseudo-Lowell.
In post 320, Lowell wrote:Are they boring? Because sometimes I ignore boring ones. Pick the two most important and I'll answer.
In post 316, Lowell wrote:Yes, I'm VERY worried about it. There's nothing I like less than when a wagon forms, gets close, and then people just start to weasel themselves out of it without any good reason other than "it's too early" or "I want to keep looking" or whatever. Again, this game shouldn't just be pissing around waiting until deadline and then panic-lynching. sakura is probably scum.
In post 316, Lowell wrote:So how about you address the point I made instead of polishing your mock incredulation act.