In post 73, mhsmith0 wrote:Non-serious vote to put knight at L-2 because... ?
Check Sakura's reaction.
In post 73, mhsmith0 wrote:Non-serious vote to put knight at L-2 because... ?
In post 60, knightmare wrote:In post 58, texcat wrote:Yep. Good enough for a first vote. Not good enough for Knight to have to defend. Plus Knight's defense stinks. For reactions, really?
Sakura's reason was because I sheeped an RVS vote. You agree that's scummy?
Also, seriously - why the fuck else would I sheep an RVS vote that was clearly going nowhere while blatantly saying I was shamelessly sheeping it if not for reactions?
JFC you guys lack critical thinking skills.
In post 50, Sayaka Maizono wrote:OK.
Your reaction towards Sakura was really bad. I feel you aren't considering the motivations behind her posts and instead are just posturing here. As a few examples: what is the purpose in calling a post on page like 2 "reaching"?Who do you think is more likely to "reach" on page 2, scum who wants to blend in and avoid tipping anyone off; or town who starts with the game with no information and thus wants to push around to get reactions? Both of which are things you said in this thread btw so I know you're aware of this. I think you saw her pushing you and got worried that it would gain traction, and overreacted.
Moreover for someone who acts like they caught scum straight out of RVS phase you haven't so much as voted her and instead keep your vote on the RVS wagon you joined? If you were going for reactions here you should have voted her. I think what you did is more like scum testing the waters to see if their push would be well received before wanting to commit to it, than town who is believing of what they're saying.
Your entire angle contradicts itself tbh, and it's for this reason I'm voting you.
In post 34, knightmare wrote:"Refuse to believe" ? That's a rather hard line to take so early in the game when your reasons for me being scum aren't that good in the first place. Not sure if you're scum or just extremely subjective in your scum hunting, but either way it's not a good look.
This is a kind of thing I think scum are more likely to say than town because all it is a bullshit neutral sounding comment that's designed to look good and posture. If you were town and you were actually unsure out of her posts what is the point in throwing that "it's not a good look on the end" if not to throw shade at her? And if you were town and thought she was more likely to be scum, you would have said as much instead of acting unsure about it (which again points to being afraid to commit to it).
[/quote]In post 34, knightmare wrote:2) I did want to generate discussion/reactions, and it's worked. You bit and now others can weigh in on our interactions.
"You bit and now others can weigh in on our interactions"? Plzzzz.
In post 76, texcat wrote:
I had a different understanding of the reason for Sakura's vote. I don't believe that it was just for sheeping.
I didn't say that it was scummy, I said that it was good enough for a first vote, while at the same time not good enough to bother defending against. It certainlymightbe scummy, but your continued poor defensedoeslook scummy.
In post 64, Sakura Hana wrote:All of these were perfectly fine for sheeping, yet you didn't you only did so later.
2) I "bit"? That's funny since i could've completely ignored your vote, instead i engaged you on it by asking you a question, something that can't actually be ignored.
In post 61, knightmare wrote:In post 57, Lowell wrote:Oh hey knight is scum. Good find, whoever started this. Early wagons rule. BLOOD!
VOTE: knight
Stats say at least one of the people on my wagon by now is scum.
Is it you?
VOTE: Lowell
More seriously - did you actually read anything or are you just parroting off of someone you can't even readily recall after 2 pages of reading?
In post 84, Lowell wrote:I'm a gut player, and my gut is always* right about these things.
In post 39, Sakura Hana wrote:All these people sheeping me are giving me the chills however...
In post 84, Lowell wrote:Eh, basically the second thing.
No but really, this guy is scum. I'm a gut player, and my gut is always* right about these things.The entirety of his ISO is him getting madder and madder while trying to look calm and collected.Even the latest few "let me put together a ponderous, methodical case on some rube to look like I'm helping" reeks of scum.
Again, not sure how, or why, this wagon started. But don't care. Go with me on this, sheeple. He doesn't like being caught for something so stupid, but hey it's fun for the rest of us.
* not always
In post 89, Lowell wrote:Well I would argue that knight is impossible to lynch, because as soon as the votes got serious many folks, including you, mysteriously got cold feet.
So you see we have a bit of a catch-22 here. Which hurts my brain. Let's do less thinking and more playing with our hearts... and guts.... kill knight.
In post 82, Almost50 wrote:Enough of knightmare to get an initial town lean on him. Sayaka though could use some pressure to get them talking.
Can you explain more please?
VOTE: Sayaka
In post 83, Almost50 wrote:Preliminary town leans: chilled, Garmr & knight. Everyone else is more or less in the null zone.
In post 69, Sakura Hana wrote:In post 67, Garmr wrote:also what's your thoughts on lowell?
His OMGUS vote was the first thign that caught my attention, but also was accompanied by a defiant tone, thought it was townie back then. Haven't looked at all the votes on the wagon so far, it's just that suddenly sayaka and boon voted in succession and gave me a chill. Probably my gut trying to tell me something.
I still dont think Knight's very townie, but if he is the people that blindly sheeped me would be the first ppl i would look at... I usually have trouble convincing ppl of my reads since they come from gut most of the time, and ppl just blindly sheeping me gives me a bad feeling.
In post 89, Lowell wrote:Well I would argue that knight is impossible to lynch, because as soon as the votes got serious many folks, including you, mysteriously got cold feet.
So you see we have a bit of a catch-22 here. Which hurts my brain. Let's do less thinking and more playing with our hearts... and guts.... kill knight.
In post 93, knightmare wrote:In post 82, Almost50 wrote:Enough of knightmare to get an initial town lean on him. Sayaka though could use some pressure to get them talking.
Can you explain more please?
VOTE: Sayaka
In post 83, Almost50 wrote:Preliminary town leans: chilled, Garmr & knight. Everyone else is more or less in the null zone.
I don't necessarily disagree with you on those two. Garmr seems to be looking at things objectively but he also strikes me as a strong player generally so I would say my town lean there is cautiously light.I liked chilled's reaction to Sayaka's naked vote earlier, I had similar thoughts to what I'm assuming he did in that instance.
In post 88, Madonna wrote:unless you think knightmare is a mislynch?