In post 374, Randomnamechange wrote:You are right. We run too much of a risk lynching.
We are not no lynching today.
In post 374, Randomnamechange wrote:You are right. We run too much of a risk lynching.
In post 329, Aronis wrote:In post 284, Randomnamechange wrote:Town gains a huge amount tonight. Generally I would say lynch is fine but we are getting no where. Day 1 lynches almost always hit town. Look at previous iterations.
The odds of us hitting town are 7/13. That's incredibly low compared to most games. And info is only going to help us so much when 1-3 townies end up dead and we dont possess a majority anymore.
In post 371, droog wrote:In post 367, Xkfyu wrote:In post 366, Yarrrrgami wrote:The types that be dancin' round hopin' for dead cthulhu to rise again from the briny deep in his palace o' R'lyeh. They also be lovin' that fishy Dagon fellow.
They be dancin' round their idols, hopin' that cthulhu be opening the gate in reality so that the realm o' Yog-Sothoth be invadin' us; those types.
Bad news, they be.
I'm following you now.
UNVOTE: Aronis
VOTE: Rory
i dont like this
for someone trying to keep independent thoughts
which is something i get from your iso
i dont like you sheeping so blindly
In post 365, Xkfyu wrote:However, this being my first role madness game, it's entirely possible that I'm just talking out my ass and am way off base. I think it's better to just defer to the more experienced here.
In post 372, droog wrote:also i still think its worth noting
that if we lynch rory automatically for claiming
the other 2 neutrals will joint wit scum
In post 374, Randomnamechange wrote:You are right. We run too much of a risk lynching.
In post 377, 3dicerolling wrote:In post 329, Aronis wrote:In post 284, Randomnamechange wrote:Town gains a huge amount tonight. Generally I would say lynch is fine but we are getting no where. Day 1 lynches almost always hit town. Look at previous iterations.
The odds of us hitting town are 7/13. That's incredibly low compared to most games. And info is only going to help us so much when 1-3 townies end up dead and we dont possess a majority anymore.
This is one of the few reasons I'm not voting aronis. This is a really town minded statement and it holds truth here.
In post 370, 3dicerolling wrote:Why are you guys unvoting aronis?
In post 380, Xkfyu wrote:If you believe this:
In post 377, 3dicerolling wrote:In post 329, Aronis wrote:In post 284, Randomnamechange wrote:Town gains a huge amount tonight. Generally I would say lynch is fine but we are getting no where. Day 1 lynches almost always hit town. Look at previous iterations.
The odds of us hitting town are 7/13. That's incredibly low compared to most games. And info is only going to help us so much when 1-3 townies end up dead and we dont possess a majority anymore.
This is one of the few reasons I'm not voting aronis. This is a really town minded statement and it holds truth here.
then what was this about?
In post 370, 3dicerolling wrote:Why are you guys unvoting aronis?
In post 378, Xkfyu wrote:And yes, I HAVE given this quite a bit of thought, and I've come to the conclusion that I can't find any holes in Yarr's approach. And since I fully believe that Rory is not town, I have no problems sheeping Yarr.
In post 381, 3dicerolling wrote:I wasn't fully read up when I made that post, and changed my mind somewhat.
I'm still kind of conflicted on him tbh. I have hard a difficult time reading aronis when I play with him.
In post 383, Xkfyu wrote:In post 381, 3dicerolling wrote:I wasn't fully read up when I made that post, and changed my mind somewhat.
I'm still kind of conflicted on him tbh. I have hard a difficult time reading aronis when I play with him.
Are you suddenly floundering on your Aronis read? I don't remember you being a flounderer.
In post 382, droog wrote:In post 378, Xkfyu wrote:And yes, I HAVE given this quite a bit of thought, and I've come to the conclusion that I can't find any holes in Yarr's approach. And since I fully believe that Rory is not town, I have no problems sheeping Yarr.
what do you mean by 'yarr's approach'?
In post 384, 3dicerolling wrote:In post 383, Xkfyu wrote:In post 381, 3dicerolling wrote:I wasn't fully read up when I made that post, and changed my mind somewhat.
I'm still kind of conflicted on him tbh. I have hard a difficult time reading aronis when I play with him.
Are you suddenly floundering on your Aronis read? I don't remember you being a flounderer.
Conflicted =/= floundering
You can talk to me about my Aronis read if you would like, or you could be scum and try to mis-represent me. Your choice.
In post 386, Xkfyu wrote:In post 384, 3dicerolling wrote:In post 383, Xkfyu wrote:In post 381, 3dicerolling wrote:I wasn't fully read up when I made that post, and changed my mind somewhat.
I'm still kind of conflicted on him tbh. I have hard a difficult time reading aronis when I play with him.
Are you suddenly floundering on your Aronis read? I don't remember you being a flounderer.
Conflicted =/= floundering
You can talk to me about my Aronis read if you would like, or you could be scum and try to mis-represent me. Your choice.
Well, it certainly looked like floundering but ok, let's talk.
That I can recall, your vote was never on Aronis, nor did you express any concerns before your "why are you guys unvoting Aronis" question. Why were you so upset, at the time, that we were unvoting?
In post 387, droog wrote:floundering?
why floundering over "conflicted"?
and why does 'floundering' look scummy to you?
In post 389, Xkfyu wrote:In post 387, droog wrote:floundering?
why floundering over "conflicted"?
and why does 'floundering' look scummy to you?
I'll circle back and address this once I'm done interacting with 3dr.
In post 388, 3dicerolling wrote:In post 386, Xkfyu wrote:In post 384, 3dicerolling wrote:In post 383, Xkfyu wrote:In post 381, 3dicerolling wrote:I wasn't fully read up when I made that post, and changed my mind somewhat.
I'm still kind of conflicted on him tbh. I have hard a difficult time reading aronis when I play with him.
Are you suddenly floundering on your Aronis read? I don't remember you being a flounderer.
Conflicted =/= floundering
You can talk to me about my Aronis read if you would like, or you could be scum and try to mis-represent me. Your choice.
Well, it certainly looked like floundering but ok, let's talk.
That I can recall, your vote was never on Aronis, nor did you express any concerns before your "why are you guys unvoting Aronis" question. Why were you so upset, at the time, that we were unvoting?
I have been very busy lately, so not a lot of time to invest in mafia. I have been somewhat following the game, and noticed Aronis had dropped off from posting, something he does in his scum game, that I found fishy. I also remembered he acted like that in a recent towngame, so I was conflicted their, and wanted more posting from aronis to get a better read on him.
I did not want people to unvote him because the pressure got him to keep posting and also that I hadn't read the post that made me slightly town read aronis.
Why do you feel about aronis the way you currently do?
In post 390, 3dicerolling wrote:In post 389, Xkfyu wrote:In post 387, droog wrote:floundering?
why floundering over "conflicted"?
and why does 'floundering' look scummy to you?
I'll circle back and address this once I'm done interacting with 3dr.
Circling back! You flounderer!
In post 393, Espeonage wrote:On phone so I'll keep it succinct. Is anyone else disturbed by the fact that Xk is trying to strongarm himself in to a leader position? Because it feels fishy to me. Yarr's argument for Rory makes sense so I will probably compromise to there.
In post 339, Xkfyu wrote:In post 331, Aronis wrote:In post 322, SnarkySnowman wrote:Please claim Aronis.
With 2 votes? One of which is from a person who has been out to get me from game start and the second from someone mindlessly sheeping them. So neither of which are very credible. Not to mention you've played like a complete VI. I'll pass up this opportunity, tyvm.
Actually, you have 3
VOTE: Aronis
oops, I mean 4 votes on you. You really should start reading better.
In post 345, Aneninen wrote:In post 318, Xkfyu wrote:And we are getting a N1 result list REGARDLESS of the outcome of the lynch. Why do you people keep acting like we're not?
Who said that?
In post 322, SnarkySnowman wrote:Please claim Aronis.
At L–4 or so?
Whut?
You care about everything but scumhunting.
In post 334, Yarrrrgami wrote:How about we all play one o' me favorite games for long voyages like this.
It be called "Stop talkin' to the snowpirate, he be a jestin' deckhand."
The rules be pretty self-explanatory.
In post 335, Firebringer wrote:Yarrgami, I like you. But I don't think Snow is a jester. That is jsut a easy way to dismiss him.
He may or may not be a Jester... what a shame would it be if he died at Night trolololol!
In post 336, Randomnamechange wrote:He was reffering to SORM Ihe missed the game not you. In that game town got screwed over by a massclaim (especially my fault)
Yeah, I actually didn't remember who was that Nightkill at Night1. However, it wasn't your fault, I think.
Wait-oh. You did the very same right before Shos...
Or was that a pressurizing vote to make Aronis post something relevant?
By the way,
Aronis.
Read list. Now.
In post 389, Xkfyu wrote:In post 387, droog wrote:floundering?
why floundering over "conflicted"?
and why does 'floundering' look scummy to you?
I'll circle back and address this once I'm done interacting with 3dr.