In post 268, Elsa and Anna wrote: In post 249, Klingoncelt wrote:He already hinted at his role, aren't you reading the thread? He said he won't count among the living at endgame. Like a Treestump.
He already claimed yes.
A tree stump can't vote.
he might die to be a tree stump , or there might be another mechanics.
I hate the way people are fooling around this claim and I must really admit. I really hated the claim in first place ...
I hate the way people seem to be kind of half-challenging and dancing around the claim. I feel like there's scum in that pile, especially since discussion of his claim is a good way to talk about setup and mechanical without taking the time to actually read people.
I don't like the bp claim part, but I feel like in the end it doesn't matter much because his vote doesn't count in lylo.
In post 272, beeboy wrote:{Raskolnikov, Extrapolated Eagle}
{AristoCow, A Real Scourge}
{Elsa and Anna, iraonavp}
{Holly and Sugar, shos}
{Klingoncelt}
{kelbris, SnarkySnowman, Alchemist21}
VOTE: Snarky
While my thoughts on Kelbris can change Snarky's claim makes no sense and he cannot undo that.
The thing with that claim is his reasoning is that he was scared he was going to be a distraction but if he can't be lynched why should he be scared of that? If he can confirm him self as town seeing people push a town slot would give us a lot of info which is why I think it is a fake claim.
No actually by claiming the lynchproof part now we avoid potentially tunneling/defending/arguing his alignment all game and then having him claim and forcing a quicklynch at the end of d1.
In post 283, Elsa and Anna wrote:as RC is not around [checking under the cossins - no he is not there either]
UNVOTE:
I liked his responses
What did you like about them?
In post 286, iraonavp wrote: In post 280, beeboy wrote:Rask and EE are probably town I have trouble seeing someone putting in so much effort on posts that could get potential backlash. Considering how much of the player list is idling they are just doing a lot of unneeded effort if they where scum and nothing about it in particular is pinging me.
This is why I think your argument is TvT, EE.
See aphix my last completed game or bloodstone in my first newbie game. He doesn't add any extra content, just attacks playstyle and fluffs. He's playing up to walls=town fallacy and I don't like it.
In post 295, shos wrote: In post 133, Raskolnikov wrote:Working with like 20 quotes is going to take me literally hours though so just hang tight for now
Eagle, do you often post stuff like post =
130=?
Yep. In almost every catchup post. Sorry. I feel like both types of catching up can be frustrating for different reasons, though. Unless I guess you didn't respond to individual posts at all.
In post 308, shos wrote: In post 293, beeboy wrote: In post 290, shos wrote:So basically what you're saying
is "don't lynch me" and also "scum don't waste your kill on me"?
why would you say that you're BP and not just lynchproof?
So you don't like Snarky's claim?
In post 291, shos wrote:Also this is super scummy considering Snarky said a lynch on him would equal a nolynch
But you also don't like how I don't like his claim?
Yup.
His claim sounds noobish, and it is clearly suboptimal as both alignments, but your reaction to this was true shit.
This.
In post 312, beeboy wrote:Although no lynching could be dangerous if Snarky is telling the truth since since town is already down 1 vote for the majority so I will just let an investigator sort him out later.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Kelbris
I don't feel good about you. It feels like your words are excuses for actions that hide an ulterior motive. But I think rask is scummier and a good lynch today