Mini 1766: SCP Foundation Mafia (GAME OVER)

Klingoncelt · Post Post #250 (ISO) » Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:52 pm

In post 238, A Real Scourge wrote:
In post 224, Klingoncelt wrote:
In post 220, shos wrote:
I am officially back from VLA. Will fully catch up and all tomorrow.

In a 9-page game you need time to fully catch up?

You rolled Scum, didn't you.

VOTE: Shos

sadz

mmmm... this seems a bit nitpicky. like, maybe shos just doesn't have time to do anything today?

Shos can easily handle 9 slow-moving pages. He's a good player.

Klingoncelt · Post Post #251 (ISO) » Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:55 pm

In post 248, Elsa and Anna wrote:Hi, this may be my last post of the game, potentially bye, but I'm appealing my ban because I don't feel two of the points were legitimate.

GL to FA if I don't make it!

FA

, will you be taking over the slot?

iraonavp · Post Post #252 (ISO) » Mon Feb 22, 2016 4:33 pm

I've been away and missed some stuff.

In post 128, A Real Scourge wrote:iraon, is that 'calling themselves obvtown' thing just neutral in your consideration for Elsa and Anna as scum, or is it part of your read?

It's a small part of a weak read. I'll try and find a better person to vote while I read through.

UNVOTE: Elsa and Anna

iraonavp · Post Post #253 (ISO) » Mon Feb 22, 2016 5:37 pm

I don't like Klingoncelt's vote.

VOTE: Klingoncelt

Extrapolated Eagle · Post Post #254 (ISO) » Mon Feb 22, 2016 5:39 pm

@ira is Klingon your strongest scum read at the moment?

@Klingon is shos your strongest scum read at the moment? What happens if they start posting content soon? How will your read change?

iraonavp · Post Post #255 (ISO) » Mon Feb 22, 2016 5:46 pm

I read a lot of people as town-aligned, including some of the main wagons like beeboy and kelbris. It's not a very strong read.

Extrapolated Eagle · Post Post #256 (ISO) » Mon Feb 22, 2016 5:49 pm

Ok so then this is a step in a figuring out one of your more nullish reads?

My assumption is that you didn't like Klingon s vote on shos due to the fact that it avoids main wagons in an attempt to go for lurkers, but it seems a bit out of place as that seems to be the thing you do right now.

What is your read on rask, at the moment?

Klingoncelt · Post Post #257 (ISO) » Mon Feb 22, 2016 6:00 pm

In post 253, iraonavp wrote:I don't like Klingoncelt's vote.

VOTE: Klingoncelt

You must be new.

Klingoncelt · Post Post #258 (ISO) » Mon Feb 22, 2016 6:02 pm

In post 254, Extrapolated Eagle wrote:@ira is Klingon your strongest scum read at the moment?

@Klingon is shos your strongest scum read at the moment? What happens if they start posting content soon? How will your read change?

If Shos gets involved, I might remove my vote. It depends on his level of involvement.

iraonavp · Post Post #259 (ISO) » Mon Feb 22, 2016 6:04 pm

In post 256, Extrapolated Eagle wrote:Ok so then this is a step in a figuring out one of your more nullish reads?

My assumption is that you didn't like Klingon s vote on shos due to the fact that it avoids main wagons in an attempt to go for lurkers, but it seems a bit out of place as that seems to be the thing you do right now.

I didn't like her vote because it seemed like she was explicitly calling shos a liar for something arbitrary. I don't think that shos would be more or less involved as either alignment.

What is your read on rask, at the moment?

I think he's town-aligned.

iraonavp · Post Post #260 (ISO) » Mon Feb 22, 2016 6:05 pm

In post 257, Klingoncelt wrote:
In post 253, iraonavp wrote:I don't like Klingoncelt's vote.

VOTE: Klingoncelt

You must be new.

I'm not new. Why do you say this?

beeboy · Post Post #261 (ISO) » Mon Feb 22, 2016 6:05 pm

In post 257, Klingoncelt wrote:
In post 253, iraonavp wrote:I don't like Klingoncelt's vote.

VOTE: Klingoncelt

You must be new.

What does this mean

Extrapolated Eagle · Post Post #262 (ISO) » Mon Feb 22, 2016 6:09 pm

In post 258, Klingoncelt wrote:
In post 254, Extrapolated Eagle wrote:@ira is Klingon your strongest scum read at the moment?

@Klingon is shos your strongest scum read at the moment? What happens if they start posting content soon? How will your read change?

If Shos gets involved, I might remove my vote. It depends on his level of involvement.

Ok. Did you have any other reads right now?

In post 259, iraonavp wrote:
In post 256, Extrapolated Eagle wrote:Ok so then this is a step in a figuring out one of your more nullish reads?

My assumption is that you didn't like Klingon s vote on shos due to the fact that it avoids main wagons in an attempt to go for lurkers, but it seems a bit out of place as that seems to be the thing you do right now.

I didn't like her vote because it seemed like she was explicitly calling shos a liar for something arbitrary. I don't think that shos would be more or less involved as either alignment.

What is your read on rask, at the moment?

I think he's town-aligned.

You mean you didn't like her vote because she said that she didn't like how absent shos has been after disappearing?

Explain your thoughts behind him being town?

iraonavp · Post Post #263 (ISO) » Mon Feb 22, 2016 6:17 pm

In post 262, Extrapolated Eagle wrote:
In post 259, iraonavp wrote:
In post 256, Extrapolated Eagle wrote:Ok so then this is a step in a figuring out one of your more nullish reads?

My assumption is that you didn't like Klingon s vote on shos due to the fact that it avoids main wagons in an attempt to go for lurkers, but it seems a bit out of place as that seems to be the thing you do right now.

I didn't like her vote because it seemed like she was explicitly calling shos a liar for something arbitrary. I don't think that shos would be more or less involved as either alignment.

What is your read on rask, at the moment?

I think he's town-aligned.

You mean you didn't like her vote because she said that she didn't like how absent shos has been after disappearing?

No, I didn't like these posts:

In post 224, Klingoncelt wrote:In a 9-page game you need time to fully catch up?

You rolled Scum, didn't you.

VOTE: Shos

In post 250, Klingoncelt wrote:Shos can easily handle 9 slow-moving pages. He's a good player.

Explain your thoughts behind him being town?

I think your case against him was awful and his reaction to it was town-aligned.

Extrapolated Eagle · Post Post #264 (ISO) » Mon Feb 22, 2016 6:22 pm

First, do you know shos? Klingon seems to.

As to your statement about rask, that doesn't move anyone anywhere. What was town aligned about his post? What have you seen in his play that makes you believe he's town?

Davsto · Post Post #265 (ISO) » Mon Feb 22, 2016 8:30 pm

Clef notices one SCP sorta just sleeping in a corner, so he shoots it.

VC 1.6

beeboy (2): Elsa and Anna, Alchemist21
kelbris (2): Extrapolated Eagle, Holly and Sugar
Elsa and Anna (1): beeboy
Holly and Sugar (1): AristoCow
Raskolnikov (1): kelbris
shos (1): Klingoncelt
A Real Scourge (1): Raskolnikov
Extrapolated Eagle (1): SnarkySnowman
Klingoncelt (1): iraonavp

Not Voting (2): shos, A Real Scourge

With 13 alive, it is 7 to lynch. Deadline in (expired on 2016-03-04 23:25:00).

Elsa and Anna · Post Post #266 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2016 3:32 am

In post 251, Klingoncelt wrote:
In post 248, Elsa and Anna wrote:Hi, this may be my last post of the game, potentially bye, but I'm appealing my ban because I don't feel two of the points were legitimate.

GL to FA if I don't make it!

FA
, will you be taking over the slot?

RC remains here.

He thought his ban is a site wide force replace becuase of another mod action ... its not and he remains. as I said he don't like to post in here for a while. he come back when there are things to analise (that helps for avoiding drama I guess)

~Elsa

Elsa and Anna · Post Post #267 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2016 3:36 am

In post 239, A Real Scourge wrote:how is ari 'better than this', FA? he's kinda been bugging me but it's hard to pin down why.

well The Ari I know tries harder to produce reads not just act like the wind with a lot of fluff ...

thats really hard to describe. but Its not the town Ari I saw multiple times. i never saw his scum game though

~Elsa

Elsa and Anna · Post Post #268 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2016 3:38 am

In post 249, Klingoncelt wrote:He already hinted at his role, aren't you reading the thread? He said he won't count among the living at endgame. Like a Treestump.

He already claimed yes.

A tree stump can't vote.

he might die to be a tree stump , or there might be another mechanics.

I hate the way people are fooling around this claim and I must really admit. I really hated the claim in first place ...

Elsa and Anna · Post Post #269 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2016 3:40 am

I want more pressure on beeboy.

he basically did nothing so far beside that trolling thing which he admitted was a trolling ...

beeboy · Post Post #270 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2016 3:42 am

My role can't be a scum role so meh.

Elsa and Anna · Post Post #271 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2016 3:43 am

A mason is not scum

how can we know that your not only scum

start making reads and stuff please.

beeboy · Post Post #272 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2016 5:40 am

{Raskolnikov, Extrapolated Eagle}
{AristoCow, A Real Scourge}
{Elsa and Anna, iraonavp}
{Holly and Sugar, shos}
{Klingoncelt}
{kelbris, SnarkySnowman, Alchemist21}

VOTE: Snarky

While my thoughts on Kelbris can change Snarky's claim makes no sense and he cannot undo that.

The thing with that claim is his reasoning is that he was scared he was going to be a distraction but if he can't be lynched why should he be scared of that? If he can confirm him self as town seeing people push a town slot would give us a lot of info which is why I think it is a fake claim.

Alchemist21 · Post Post #273 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2016 5:42 am

Didn't Beeboy say he was kidding about the Mason claim already? He's not still trying to say he is one is he?

Aristophanes · Post Post #274 (ISO) » Tue Feb 23, 2016 5:57 am

In post 249, Klingoncelt wrote:
In post 225, Elsa and Anna wrote:
In post 223, Klingoncelt wrote:
@SnarkySnowman,
are you a Treestump?

Why you felt that you have the right to ask such a question?

Thats pure rolefishing ...

~Elsa

He already hinted at his role, aren't you reading the thread? He said he won't count among the living at endgame. Like a Treestump.

Hinted? He was pretty overt with it.

I don't get E&A's dislike of the clarification unless they forgot??