Putting up with what again?
In post 11, kelbris wrote:you have no reason to claim so early into the game, we are still in the RVS phase.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: beeboy
Wow this is nasty.
Hello! I'm glad I got to play with you again! Sorry you rolled scum again, glad to see you're town here!
In post 28, iraonavp wrote:In post 20, kelbris wrote:That is my personal opinion however, and I see that most of the other players disagree with it.
UNVOTE:
Did the other players' disagreement change your mind here? I'm not sure why you unvoted.
Because he's scared scum. He realized he messed up.
In post 29, A Real Scourge wrote:i don't really see scum changing their mind because of popular opinion so publically like that. a bit brazen, isn't it? though that could be a reverse to think the reverse! is that scummy to you, iraonavp? (gosh do you have like... a nickname? im not sure how to begin breaking that up)
I do. Just ask Klingon.
In post 37, Raskolnikov wrote:So within hours we have a mason claim (unless she's kidding) and an unkillable claim. I hate both you.
That's ok I don't think feel good about you.
In post 39, Raskolnikov wrote:Especially if you're unkillable because you could have eaten a NK if you're actually town.
VOTE: snarky
They could have, but it's all wifom anyways and I imagine scum are pretty posses at something like this happening. We've got conftown that can't be dealt with, I mean that's a massive advantage. You should be happy and you aren't. Why not?
In post 40, beeboy wrote:Wait @everyone I can guarantee we can figure out Elsa and Anna's role if we get them to L-1 by page 3 I promise.
Why them in particular? Because they're so.... Them? I don't think you really have to try to get them to the point where they're a pretty easy read in most cases, IMO.
In post 42, Raskolnikov wrote:I don't actually believe you but that sounds like a fun thing to do regardless
Doesn't it? But why are you so hoppy with your vote?
In post 45, iraonavp wrote:In post 39, Raskolnikov wrote:Especially if you're unkillable because you could have eaten a NK if you're actually town.
VOTE: snarky
Is he scum-aligned, though? We can make policy lynches later if necessary. I think placing your vote here at this point is anti-town, since he already claimed.
Yep. Why are you so unsure about this? I don't feel too good about you, either.
Haven't they? Good to see you again, too. And as town, just the same!
In post 55, AristoCow wrote:How...adult of you!In post 52, kelbris wrote:When I said "I should've seen it coming", I mean that whilst it was unexpected, I should have realized that it was a possible tactic used in the game of Mafia. Public opinion changed my vote because my (rather stupid I will admit) vote immediately made everyone accuse me when I was simply basing my vote on past experience, sometimes you just need to admit when you are wrong and realize when others are right, even in mafia.
I like being the adult one usually!
Dammit, how can I scumread you when logic and humility are employed!?
- Ari
He actually reads scary like my horribad off-site scum metastatic from two years ago. Him and rask are my two biggest scum reads atm.
In post 58, iraonavp wrote:In post 51, Elsa and Anna wrote:Do you have a strategy besides parking your ass on obvtown?
You can't possibly consider yourself "obvtown" at this stage of the game. I understand that there's a certain degree of bravado there, but still.
Why shouldnt they? I think they're pretty obvtown, and they even have a pm that tells them they're obvtown (unless they don't and in that case why wouldn't they just say they were obvtown?)
In post 59, Raskolnikov wrote:
Iioa? This isn't playing the game this is nasty scum stuffs
In post 61, Raskolnikov wrote:I thought that if anyone would appreciate literature it one who calls themselves Aristophanes. I suppose you are merely a dilettante? A pretender? An errant, craven pander of ill stock and disreputable house? Bah!
VOTE: Aristo
Seriously though.
Yeah, seriously.
Wait. OMGUS much?
In post 63, beeboy wrote:In post 62, Raskolnikov wrote:Ugh these claims
I think VT claiming mason to try to eat a NK is unlikely in a role madness game like this
I think it might actually be worth running him up and either lynching him if hes scum or outing the other mason
I think if scum goes for masons it isn't the worst thing in the world in a role madness game
Can someone good at this game tell me if I'm right or wrong thanks.
Vote Elsa
Fake vote intentional?
In post 67, Elsa and Anna wrote:Hey hey hey!
If you any personal problem with My sister don't involve me in them! thx
~Elsa
Please don't lock her out of this, please don't slam the door, you don't have to keep your distance anymore~
In post 73, Elsa and Anna wrote:VOTE: Kelbris
that was a shitty reaction in page one. and it still is.
~Elsa
Yep. What about rask?
In post 76, AristoCow wrote:I was helping!
But now it's page 4 (nice work getting us there btw), and my vote is no longer required here. Also, him trying to get you to self hammer is shady.
But I did like my Kel vote a lot better. Let's do that again!
VOTE: Kelbris
- Ari
QFT
That's true. Lets get to the next page!
In post 88, beeboy wrote:In post 87, Elsa and Anna wrote:
If I wanted you to self hammer I would have started a real post based on how your 2nd post vaguely resembles a policy lynch which would actually make you mad since town was scum reading you for that. I was just trying to lighten the mood <3 =D You wouldn't self hammer and give me the satisfaction of succeeding which is why I was comfortable having you at L-1.
Let's have a fun game ok?
Define 'fun.'
In post 91, SnarkySnowman wrote:In post 80, Holly and Sugar wrote:Snarky you never claim that.
Really? I mean see my reasoning for it, is that not smart?
I thought it was smart, but I'm just an eagle
In post 93, beeboy wrote:In post 92, Klingoncelt wrote:In post 79, SnarkySnowman wrote:To clarify - lynching me is the same as a no lynch, and night killing me is the same as a no kill. I only claim early because I know I often get mistaken for not town and I wanted to not be a distraction. By the same logic I'm pretty sure I wasn't going to be night killed anyway so
You're unlynchable and unkillable?
Sounds a little overpowered to me.
VOTE: Snarky
I agree wouldn't hurt to try right?
Yes?
In post 114, AristoCow wrote:Wait...so your body counts vote votes needed,but your vote doesn't?In post 112, SnarkySnowman wrote:Aristocow - the thing that makes me not so OP is that I'm not counted towards a majority for endgame purposes. I only have a vote / count towards a voting majority.
@Holly - hydra slip or???
Is this only in endgame or is it always??
Holly Suga, you guys need an Avatar.
Also, I didn't see a town slip, and pointing it out yourself makes it not indicative anymore.
Also also, Pip is Itlepip.
- Ari
Yeah you're a very solid NULL. Please think more town thoughts, thanks!
In post 115, SnarkySnowman wrote:As in, scum's wincon is usually something like "you win when you make up half of the living players" or someshit, I don't count. So if there's 3 town including me, and 2 scum, scum win right there.
I guess that makes it a little less exciting, but still we have conftown, right?
In post 118, AristoCow wrote:For the record,In post 115, SnarkySnowman wrote:As in, scum's wincon is usually something like "you win when you make up half of the living players" or someshit, I don't count. So if there's 3 town including me, and 2 scum, scum win right there.Thatis something to claim outright.
In the case of a Bullet and Lynch Proof role, I'd claim the latter,nnot the for, in the hopes of drawing an NK.
This is pretty much conftown. I'm good with this!
I find myself just agreeing or disagreeing with your posts but you don't have any feelings and I really don't like it.
In post 119, AristoCow wrote:Wow, rereading that it's obviously about hydra slipping. I feel dumb now.
I still found little content in this iso thus far.
VOTE: Holla at yo Suga Momma!
Like this. Why would you do this? What do you even want here? I don't get it. :/
In post 128, A Real Scourge wrote:iraon, is that 'calling themselves obvtown' thing just neutral in your consideration for Elsa and Anna as scum, or is it part of your read?
Good question. I feel better about you than other people here *sideways glance at kel and rask*
In post 129, Alchemist21 wrote:VOTE: Beeboy
For trying to vote an Unlynchable claim and wasting his vote like that.
Not a bad vote. Glad you're probably town, too!