theopor_COD wrote:
As for the cult issue which everyone has gone ape at me over, Tyhess included, it was the fact Tyhess commented that the cultist knows that only
other person wasn't town. When obviously there's two mafioso. Seems pretty stupid if your scum and can't remember how many of em they are, meh maybe I'm reading too much into it, Tyhess's play doesn't exactly deserve a pass does it.
yo theo did you see me write this post????:
tyhess wrote:
That was just an English mistake then.....I meant to say that the mafia knows that all but one person is protown....
I think that explains how you misinterpretted my English mistake as saying that the cultist thinks there was only one other person, compared to what I meant to say was that the mafia knew their was only 1 person they didn't know (the cultist).
And Vollkan, I thought about that propping up to, but I think that if we focused on A, B, and C and then something fishy comes up, and after 4-5 days we don't find anything on A,B,C, then we start to attack 2 + 4.
Your other point was about if we went to 1,2,3 and A+C were scummy. I think that's the only valid case against doing it this way. However, we would do it the same way as above. We would finish "investigating" 1,2,3 and then, if we think A +C are scummy again, we'll go back to them.
And for the thing about not having a consensus top 3. That's why i think we need to all vote for a top 3 and then go after the 3 with the most votes. That goes into what I've been saying....there is no consensus top 3, which results in not going after the same person, which results in people possibly being able to slip out of problems that they have created for themselves.