In post 223, LicketyQuickety wrote:No. You misunderstand what I was saying. To use a confidence and lack of fear meter as a means to gauge if someone is Town or not is not even close to an accurate way to read people because it is a known secret that confidence gets people to follow you and being fearless means you don't have to hide. It can be faked.
Okay, that makes more sense. BulletNLynchproof doesn't talk about any of this in his reads list though?
In post 223, LicketyQuickety wrote:No. You misunderstand what I was saying. To use a confidence and lack of fear meter as a means to gauge if someone is Town or not is not even close to an accurate way to read people because it is a known secret that confidence gets people to follow you and being fearless means you don't have to hide. It can be faked.
Okay, that makes more sense. BulletNLynchproof doesn't talk about any of this in his reads list though?
No he doesn't. He is either trying to fake a believable reads list or is doing it subconsciously.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
In post 216, LicketyQuickety wrote:2.) Your reads are based on the presents of the person ie. what their confidence levels are and how scared or fearless they
appear
is. These things do not always tell what alignment they are and some people are just naturally more fearless
appearing
and I give you more credit to read people more accurately than that.
In post 227, Postie wrote:BulletNLynchproof doesn't talk about any of this in his reads list though?
I gave you your room because I am pretty sure you are town and I think you will get some good stuff out of it.
This is a direct grab for towncred by the way.
If you think I just said that for no reason then you are sadly mistaken. And glad you have confirmed yourself Scum by confirming you know Postie is Town. Ace work.
VOTE: RC
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
In post 216, LicketyQuickety wrote:2.) Your reads are based on the presents of the person ie. what their confidence levels are and how scared or fearless they
appear
is. These things do not always tell what alignment they are and some people are just naturally more fearless
appearing
and I give you more credit to read people more accurately than that.
In post 227, Postie wrote:BulletNLynchproof doesn't talk about any of this in his reads list though?
I'm having a lot of trouble following your thoughts here.
I understand that you are having difficulty following my thought process. You are not the first nor the last to say such a thing. Basically I am going off of how I know people operate and matching that up with a behavior that is common in people to deduct how BNL came up with that reads list.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
I gave you your room because I am pretty sure you are town and I think you will get some good stuff out of it.
This is a direct grab for towncred by the way.
If you think I just said that for no reason then you are sadly mistaken. And glad you have confirmed yourself Scum by confirming you know Postie is Town. Ace work.
VOTE: RC
1)If you think RC is scum, why did you give him his room with Postie? You said you gave Postie her room
I gave you your room because I am pretty sure you are town and I think you will get some good stuff out of it.
This is a direct grab for towncred by the way.
If you think I just said that for no reason then you are sadly mistaken. And glad you have confirmed yourself Scum by confirming you know Postie is Town. Ace work.
VOTE: RC
1)If you think RC is scum, why did you give him his room with Postie? You said you gave Postie her room
because you were townreading her
.
2)Why are you excessively wagon hopping?
1.) Because it was not until that post was made that I was confident that RC was Scum.
2.) Excessively? Wagon hoping? I think these things need a definition.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
Actually, looked back and realised you didn't change your vote as fast as I thought you did. Nevertheless, you voted RC in #155, and in your very next post you voted me. Don't you think that's a little too fast for a vote change?
In post 236, BNL wrote:Actually, looked back and realised you didn't change your vote as fast as I thought you did. Nevertheless, you voted RC in #155, and in your very next post you voted me. Don't you think that's a little too fast for a vote change?
It would've been accept my first vote on RC wasn't a serious one.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
In post 236, BNL wrote:Actually, looked back and realised you didn't change your vote as fast as I thought you did. Nevertheless, you voted RC in #155, and in your very next post you voted me. Don't you think that's a little too fast for a vote change?
It would've been accept my first vote on RC wasn't a serious one.
In post 236, BNL wrote:Actually, looked back and realised you didn't change your vote as fast as I thought you did. Nevertheless, you voted RC in #155, and in your very next post you voted me. Don't you think that's a little too fast for a vote change?
It would've been accept my first vote on RC wasn't a serious one.
Why are you non-serious voting out of RVS?
I already explained why when talking to Postie.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
- What were your thoughts behind that reaction test on LQ?
has also now been answered. Something about how frank and overly arrogant LicketyQuickety is struck me as town, and I thought perhaps you were trying to hone in on that, but I guess not.
So yeah, conflicted on LQ. I'm not sure scum!Lickety would be this ballsy and draw so much attention to himself all the time.
On a similar vein, I think EE's 130 comes across as arrogant too, but in a fake way. Like LQ's arrogance feels super genuine, but EE's post makes me think he's pretending to be more confident in the stuff he says than he actually is. Especially since he uses a lot of really emphatic, harsh language in regards to LQ's posts, as if he thinks LQ is being really scummy, but then ends with a null read. I think if you have a null read on someone, it would be really odd to write your post like that.
VOTE: Hawk Eyes
Not really sure what to make of Titus' certainty in Lickety being town, so...
@Hawk Eyes/Titus
- Can you explain to me what Lickety is doing here that's so different from his scum game in Suikoden Mafia? His play here does feel slightly different, but I'm not sure it's "night and day".
Sorry; had a scumread on Hawk Eyes for reasons given above, but didn't want to go into said reasons before I had an answer to that second question I directed at RC.
I don't see how LQ's obvtown ness isn't obvious to anyone reading Sudoken. In Sudoken, he was passive as fuck, had no investigation and basically gave up when I caught him. Here, he's actually a town leader.
Hawk Eyes, if you still have a scumread on BNL, I'd like you to quickly summarise your case on him. Because you just seem to have parked your vote on him after giving, like, one or two vague reasons, and then stopped interacting with him.