In post 696, Titus wrote:Oh I finally have a game to document where I read you right as town FB. :-p
You don't gut read me.
Ever.
You are just scum all the time, thats how you know >.>
In post 696, Titus wrote:Oh I finally have a game to document where I read you right as town FB. :-p
In post 700, Firebringer wrote:In post 696, Titus wrote:Oh I finally have a game to document where I read you right as town FB. :-p
You don't gut read me.
Ever.
You are just scum all the time, thats how you know >.>
In post 693, Titus wrote:In post 687, RadiantCowbells wrote:Outing the fact that Titus and FB were obviously softing Mason but not in a town way.
I'm still not sure where I want to go on that but it is badly eclipsed by some of my other reads.
Why the fuck would you out this though
In post 684, Titus wrote:Fair enough. You want to talk, we can. Whenever.
@Shiro, Can I give FB Donuts instead of you cookies? I think I have to for game sake.
In post 702, RadiantCowbells wrote:In post 693, Titus wrote:In post 687, RadiantCowbells wrote:Outing the fact that Titus and FB were obviously softing Mason but not in a town way.
I'm still not sure where I want to go on that but it is badly eclipsed by some of my other reads.
Why the fuck would you out this though
Why the fuck wouldn't I?
I don't believe you're masons together, I don't think that even if you're both town that you were going to end up eating a role bullet for the mason softing because of how overt it was.
In post 709, pignash wrote:Not super fond of the Heat wagon, maybe it's just because he asked where I was. Why would he care if I was being quiet when town was plenty active at that point other than to try and sort me? Seems too proactive to be scum.
In post 714, pignash wrote:Proactive -acting in anticipation of future problems, needs, or changes.
Just in regards to asking where I was. That one action was proactive. That doesn't mean he gets a pass for the rest of the game from me, just why I'm not scumreading him currently.
In post 715, Grib wrote:Deflecting to lurkers is not proactive.
In post 717, Dwlee99 wrote:Titus is arguing that because one scum did an rvs and declared it a joke that anyone who makes an rvs vote and says it is a joke when that is just the hitler built autobahns logical fallacy. And can we get more pressure on pistachio??
From the wiki
Unless an accusor is able to demonstrate that a player has a significant tendency to do something more frequently as scum than town, or that there is a particular incentive for scum to act in that manner, then the argument is logically dubious.