In post 245, Titus wrote:In post 244, Firebringer wrote:In post 242, Titus wrote:Shiro I has cookies. You want a cookie? Vote Dave.
Titus, how you doing?
My gut has indigestion. Other than that I am good.
We should lynch Dave. Too much focusing on being buddy buddy.
In post 421, Davsto wrote:In post 419, Grib wrote:Because RadiantCowbells is probably town.
And... town never vote town?
In post 421, Davsto wrote:In post 419, Grib wrote:Because RadiantCowbells is probably town.
And... town never vote town?
In post 426, Grib wrote:In post 421, Davsto wrote:In post 419, Grib wrote:Because RadiantCowbells is probably town.
And... town never vote town?
Let's see if that's the case here!
What do you think of my proposed town perspective for his vote on Titus in comparison with your reasoning? Which is more likely?
In post 424, Titus wrote:It's not reasonless. You're buddying and not scumhunting.
In post 429, Davsto wrote:In post 424, Titus wrote:It's not reasonless. You're buddying and not scumhunting.
Proof plz or are you just gonna say things and hope they'll be true eventually?
In post 428, Davsto wrote:In post 426, Grib wrote:In post 421, Davsto wrote:In post 419, Grib wrote:Because RadiantCowbells is probably town.
And... town never vote town?
Let's see if that's the case here!
What do you think of my proposed town perspective for his vote on Titus in comparison with your reasoning? Which is more likely?
Cowbells isn't scared of a Titus tunnel on him. He has faced a full-on Titus tunnel before and come out unscathed (and his replacement proceeded to win the game for our scumteam btw).
In post 428, Davsto wrote:In post 426, Grib wrote:In post 421, Davsto wrote:In post 419, Grib wrote:Because RadiantCowbells is probably town.
And... town never vote town?
Let's see if that's the case here!
What do you think of my proposed town perspective for his vote on Titus in comparison with your reasoning? Which is more likely?
Cowbells isn't scared of a Titus tunnel on him. He has faced a full-on Titus tunnel before and come out unscathed (and his replacement proceeded to win the game for our scumteam btw).
Minus townpoints for only responding to the part that explained why you thought I was scum - the answer to the question I asked btw - rather than the bit explaining why RadiantCowbells is town. Riiiiight.In post 427, Grib wrote:In post 421, Davsto wrote:In post 419, Grib wrote:Because RadiantCowbells is probably town.
And... town never vote town?
-townpoints for only responding to this part, btw.
In post 431, Titus wrote:In post 429, Davsto wrote:In post 424, Titus wrote:It's not reasonless. You're buddying and not scumhunting.
Proof plz or are you just gonna say things and hope they'll be true eventually?
Quoted reasons.
Still came out unscathed after a full-on Titus tunnel, point still stands. RadiantCowbells trust in his ability enough to not be scared.In post 432, Titus wrote:In post 428, Davsto wrote:In post 426, Grib wrote:In post 421, Davsto wrote:In post 419, Grib wrote:Because RadiantCowbells is probably town.
And... town never vote town?
Let's see if that's the case here!
What do you think of my proposed town perspective for his vote on Titus in comparison with your reasoning? Which is more likely?
Cowbells isn't scared of a Titus tunnel on him. He has faced a full-on Titus tunnel before and come out unscathed (and his replacement proceeded to win the game for our scumteam btw).
He only came out unscathed by causing massive amounts of drama, painting my read as just sour grapes and making sure everyone ignored me after I wasn't playing.
Man, scumreading me for making jokes. Wish that was the first time I'd seen this.In post 433, Titus wrote:You open by stating a statement you know isn't true (implied Titus is always scum) then buddying while ignoring me.
In post 419, Grib wrote:And boasting about being undefeated scum also feels like something town would do, because. They don't care about looking bad for bragging about how great they are at being scum (as that could prompt other people to doubt their townread on them in this game).
In post 436, Davsto wrote:Also, ha, the joy of being accused of buddying by someone who has literally begged half of the playerlist to vote with her, with promises of cookies too. Beautiful.
In post 442, Titus wrote:Great. Care to put that in a way socialists can understand? I have to understand the Queen's Directive on how to distribute goods.
In post 438, Titus wrote:Your entire ISO is buddying not scumhunting. None of your posts have anything that intends to sort anyone Dave.
Why?
In post 197, Davsto wrote:In post 195, Shinobi wrote:That davsto post was kinda scummy tbh.
I mean is there an actual reason or is it just for daring to contradict the easy wagon?
In post 216, Davsto wrote:Well then you're probably not reading carefully enough.In post 201, Grib wrote:In post 198, Davsto wrote:In post 194, Grib wrote:'Mario was mislynched once, therefore he probably isn't scum' doesn't work by itself.
I mean it's more "Mario was lynched in a style awfully similar to this and this doesn't remind me of his scumgame" but sure, simplify it so you can make it look bad.
I'm not, that's literally how it comes across.
In post 193, Davsto wrote:Man, I remember the last time I played a Large Normal.
MarioManiac4 replaced in and had a speedlynch on him, resulting in his death.
He was town.
I'm learning from that lesson. Mario is likely not scum.I've only played one game with scum!Mario, but I definitely don't remember it being like this.
Firebringer has changed his avatar from Toothless and that hurts me.
UNVOTE:
Not sure how I feel about certain players.
MM wagon is likely to contain mostly town with one scum max.
Unsure where to go next.
I didn't comment directly on the surprising similarity of the wagon, but I'll make a good bet right now that MarioManiac4 is town.
In post 349, Davsto wrote:In post 340, Aj The Epic wrote:Dave is an interesting case
Umm... thanks?
Shiro may or may not be town: while the obvious sheeping seems like something scum would want to avoid, it would have been weirder for her not to have done it, considering that it's exactly what she did under basically the same circumstances in Pun Mafia.
Dwlee seems kinda scummy (the "I basically agree with everything Elyse said" comment bugged me at the time but I didn't say anything), but it just seems too easy. I know it's always a cop-out answer to give, but it is.
RC? Now RC is bugging me. His reason for voting Titus - along the lines of "you haven't said I'm scum and voted me yet you always do" - basically sets it up so that if Titusdoesdecide that RC is being scummy as fuck with the awful excuse for a vote (also, RC is being scummy as fuck with the awful excuse for a vote), it'll look bad on Titus when she starts pushing, as RC can just go "oh, so now I find it odd you're not scumreading me, you've started scumreading me? Hmm..." A sort of Morton's Fork. This bugs me.
VOTE: RadiantCowbells
In post 363, Davsto wrote:In post 362, Dwlee99 wrote:Not sure if it's scummy to have 3 posts as an ISO.
I mean, if you're potentially leaning towards 3 posts being scummy, why do you - rather oddly - ignore people with 1 post (pistach)? Seems a bit odd to focus on the former.
In post 397, Davsto wrote:In post 393, Grib wrote:I don't like his vote
I hate when people go "I don't like X" but don't, you know, give a reason why. Do you have a reason why?
In post 441, Shiro wrote:In post 436, Davsto wrote:Also, ha, the joy of being accused of buddying by someone who has literally begged half of the playerlist to vote with her, with promises of cookies too. Beautiful.
This made me laugh more than it should and it hurts because my throat is hoarse Dx
Ok so far I have
Spoiler:
