Giving my opinion?Skruffs wrote:VitaminR
If it wasn't baiting me, what was it?
Yes, it seems genuine enough to me at the moment.Skruffs wrote:Did you think LML's change of heart was genuine?
I haven't agreed with everything he's done, but yeah, I think he's pro-town. The fact that I haven't directed a question at him means nothing. There are plenty of players I haven't asked anything. It just means I didn't particularly feel there were any explanations missing on his part.Skruffs wrote:Why have you been on LML's side the entire day? You've defended his actions constantly, but never once directed a question to him. How can you be so sure that he is town that you basically have no interest in talking to him?
Fairly irrelevant, since it's not going to happen, but yes, I don't find BM's claim that convincing.Skruffs wrote:Also, you would still rather lynch a cop role than no lynch?
Right, because I've used LML's reasoning to back up every accusation I've made. Oh wait, I haven't done that once. Even you I went after for my own reasons.Skruffs wrote:Side note to future readers: VitaminR and Cubs playing similarly 'behind' other, more obvious players.
BM, if you find my Skruffs vote difficult to understand, then indicate what part of my reasoning you disagree with. Similarly, if you find my Condorcet list "dumbfounding," ask me to explain.
You're exaggerating my point here. You brought something to attention that pushed the wagon forward. At the same time, you didn't want LML lynched. Seems like you're avoiding responsibility to me. That doesn't make it an absolute.Battle Mage wrote:Vitr-how do you suppose my comments are endorsing a wagon, when i have made it quite clear that LML is not the best lynch today. At this rate, you will accuse anyone who points out scumtells, but doesnt immediately hop on a BW, to be scummy, which is completely ridiculous.