Mini 1732 - Super Smash Bros. Project M(afia) - D7!

smiffle · Post Post #475 (ISO) » Fri Oct 23, 2015 3:14 pm

Dav's kinda passive right now, I want to see him actually do some shit.

oh wait, lots of people in this game are passive. w/e

mafia scum is shitting on me atm by being slow

smiffle · Post Post #476 (ISO) » Fri Oct 23, 2015 4:01 pm

fuck

mod, plz clean up

vonflare · Post Post #477 (ISO) » Fri Oct 23, 2015 4:14 pm

No thx

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #478 (ISO) » Fri Oct 23, 2015 4:25 pm

K, I like Smiffle as Town here.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #479 (ISO) » Fri Oct 23, 2015 4:33 pm

I just don't see Scum!Smiffle being all silly. It shows he's not taking things super serious which indicates Town more often then Scum. If Scum do it, they are usually faking it and I don't get that impression at all from Smiffle.

Davsto · Post Post #480 (ISO) » Fri Oct 23, 2015 4:35 pm

In post 453, All Alone wrote:
In post 215, Davsto wrote:honestly I still prefer whatsisname I'm voting

confirm vote

In post 205, Davsto wrote:Speculating which alignment Mario is purely because he's Ascetic is stupid. End of.

In post 215, Davsto wrote:I'm not gonna put MM in conftown or anything for that claim but definitely leaning town.

confirm vote

In post 269, Davsto wrote:
In post 263, smiffle wrote:
In post 215, Davsto wrote:I wanna say that LQ is scum but honestly I still prefer whatsisname I'm voting (sue me) and I still think there's a chance that LQ is just dim, to put it politely. He seems genuine in believing I should be able to summon more about that ascetic.

Hey, considering that All Alone pointed out the terrible reason you voted me to begin with, why are you still on my wagon?

I tend to trust myself more than I trust others whose alignments I am unaware of. Not because I think I'm "better", but because I know my reads come from a town perspective. I have no idea on All Alone's motives.

confirm vote

In post 412, Davsto wrote:
In post 411, GuiltyLion wrote:
In post 409, Davsto wrote:*series of text completely unrelated to me*
*vote on me*
???

[snip]

Oh lovely, the best kind of read. Like seriously, this is just yeh.

I'm becoming rather fond of naked votes, they make people react in informative ways. Do you think people will seriously lynch you just because of my vote?
One game I got quicklynched in about fifteen minutes from one super-scummy vote. I get worried.

confirm vote

Davsto · Post Post #481 (ISO) » Fri Oct 23, 2015 4:39 pm

But seriously, posts like that are bad. They don't even have to state reasons, they judt quote things and let the reader fill in the blank. Rather than risking inconsistency, they just quotes a bunch of things and let people interpret it their own way.

All Alone, explain every damn one of those "reasons" to me with some detail.

smiffle · Post Post #482 (ISO) » Fri Oct 23, 2015 4:47 pm

In post 477, vonflare wrote:No thx

Thnx mod, ur bae

Gendaberry · Post Post #483 (ISO) » Fri Oct 23, 2015 4:57 pm

In post 359, Tails wrote:
In post 342, Gendaberry wrote:
I think this ISO is pretty bad. Apart from calling smiffle's first vote awful, he hasn't done anything to scumhunt at all despite having a decent number of posts. He seems more preoccupied with setup/role speculation then actually catching scum.

How is this worse than what Lickity has done?

It isn't, you're right

VOTE: Lickity

@Lickity - Now that you're townreading pretty much the only player you've pressured this game, do you plan on actually looking for scum or is that not something we should look forward to? You've interacted with almost everyone by now, do something with it.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #484 (ISO) » Fri Oct 23, 2015 5:00 pm

In post 483, Gendaberry wrote:
In post 359, Tails wrote:
In post 342, Gendaberry wrote:
I think this ISO is pretty bad. Apart from calling smiffle's first vote awful, he hasn't done anything to scumhunt at all despite having a decent number of posts. He seems more preoccupied with setup/role speculation then actually catching scum.

How is this worse than what Lickity has done?

It isn't, you're right

VOTE: Lickity

@Lickity - Now that you're townreading pretty much the only player you've pressured this game, do you plan on actually looking for scum or is that not something we should look forward to? You've interacted with almost everyone by now, do something with it.

I'll deal with this later. I have another game that is about to start and I have to read like 26 pages (25ppp).

Xtoxm · Post Post #485 (ISO) » Fri Oct 23, 2015 5:04 pm

:/

not planning to hard defend lq here in case im wrong. but i doubt he's scum, i hate lynching the most active player on d1 as a general rule, dont plan on being involved. so yeah do this if you want, but, on your own.

does no one else find wanders recent posts scummy?

Metal Sonic · Post Post #486 (ISO) » Fri Oct 23, 2015 5:06 pm

In post 485, Xtoxm wrote:i hate lynching the most active player on d1 as a general rule,

this is incidentally true

but i find lickety really scummy in the first place so i think he is just scumming up the thread

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #487 (ISO) » Fri Oct 23, 2015 5:15 pm

In post 485, Xtoxm wrote::/

not planning to hard defend lq here in case im wrong. but i doubt he's scum, i hate lynching the most active player on d1 as a general rule, dont plan on being involved. so yeah do this if you want, but, on your own.

does no one else find wanders recent posts scummy?

I gave my thoughts on W-nl's post a few pages ago in relating to GL and couldn't justify a change of stance because I said I was leaning town on them, but watching their activity, but yeah, looks to be a logical fallacy at least.

MarioManiac4 · Post Post #488 (ISO) » Fri Oct 23, 2015 5:16 pm

In post 485, Xtoxm wrote::/

not planning to hard defend lq here in case im wrong. but i doubt he's scum, i hate lynching the most active player on d1 as a general rule, dont plan on being involved. so yeah do this if you want, but, on your own.

does no one else find wanders recent posts scummy?

In post 486, Metal Sonic wrote:
In post 485, Xtoxm wrote:i hate lynching the most active player on d1 as a general rule,

this is incidentally true

but i find lickety really scummy in the first place so i think he is just scumming up the thread

COUGHWETHEPURPLEIICOUGH

GuiltyLion · Post Post #489 (ISO) » Fri Oct 23, 2015 5:17 pm

In post 485, Xtoxm wrote:does no one else find wanders recent posts scummy?

*waves*

Metal Sonic · Post Post #490 (ISO) » Fri Oct 23, 2015 5:20 pm

In post 488, MarioManiac4 wrote:
In post 485, Xtoxm wrote::/

not planning to hard defend lq here in case im wrong. but i doubt he's scum, i hate lynching the most active player on d1 as a general rule, dont plan on being involved. so yeah do this if you want, but, on your own.

does no one else find wanders recent posts scummy?

In post 486, Metal Sonic wrote:
In post 485, Xtoxm wrote:i hate lynching the most active player on d1 as a general rule,

this is incidentally true

but i find lickety really scummy in the first place so i think he is just scumming up the thread

COUGHWETHEPURPLEIICOUGH

ur weird

MarioManiac4 · Post Post #491 (ISO) » Sat Oct 24, 2015 3:35 am

I've got an idea;
1.

MOD SHOULD GIV US A VC

2. VOTE: LicketyQuickety

vonflare · Post Post #492 (ISO) » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:19 am

vote count

LicketyQuickety

(5): Smiffle, Tails, Metal Sonic, MarioManiac4, Gendaberry

Davsto

(2): All alone, GuiltyLion

GuiltyLion

(1): Davsto

Wanderer-nl

(1): xtoxm

Not Voting

(5):
Klick
A Simple Plan
Wanderer-nl
nana
LicketyQuickety

With 14 alive it's 8 to lynch

Day ends in (expired on 2015-11-06 00:00:00)

vonflare · Post Post #493 (ISO) » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:25 am

Nana is being prodded.

Klick appears to have siteflaked and is being replaced.

Wanderer-nl · Post Post #494 (ISO) » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:27 am

In post 487, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 485, Xtoxm wrote::/

not planning to hard defend lq here in case im wrong. but i doubt he's scum, i hate lynching the most active player on d1 as a general rule, dont plan on being involved. so yeah do this if you want, but, on your own.

does no one else find wanders recent posts scummy?

I gave my thoughts on W-nl's post a few pages ago in relating to GL and couldn't justify a change of stance because I said I was leaning town on them, but watching their activity, but yeah, looks to be a logical fallacy at least.

Yeah this is really weird. You can't justify a change of read when you spot something you think is scummy? But now that someone else asks you can?

To those that think my posts are scummy:mind actually talking to me about it instead of staying vague?

smiffle · Post Post #495 (ISO) » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:31 am

In post 493, vonflare wrote:Nana is being prodded.

lol wut

smiffle · Post Post #496 (ISO) » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:33 am

Yeah, Lickety's taking the backseat approach to this game atm, and it's probably due to pressure.

Metal Sonic · Post Post #497 (ISO) » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:35 am

In post 495, smiffle wrote:
In post 493, vonflare wrote:Nana is being prodded.

lol wut

Hmmmmm

smiffle · Post Post #498 (ISO) » Sat Oct 24, 2015 4:58 am

Sooooooo, does this mean Nana isn't a mod alt? Or is von just fucking with us.

Metal Sonic · Post Post #499 (ISO) » Sat Oct 24, 2015 5:02 am

Could be a mod alt but a co-mod or a friend.