flubb nightkill is making me lean saint town and is making me want to move spiffeh to nullpile.
i hate fake guilties.jaqen wrote:Him saying "this isn't some stupid gambit", more than anything else, raises a huge red flag.
like.
a lot.
In post 2072, Jaqen Hghar wrote:In post 2065, farside22 wrote:I wonder what is up with Jean.
That whole post calling gork out was odd
How so? As a player in general, he doesn't seem very trustworthy. He seems to be the kind who does reaction tests and gambits and that whole sort of thing. It's easy for me to see that because it's exactly how I used to play. Him saying "this isn't some stupid gambit", more than anything else, raises a huge red flag.
In post 2069, farside22 wrote:In post 2067, Jaqen Hghar wrote:I don't care for guessing the reliability so of guilties. If she flips and it's not scum then, logically, it's your turn to eat it. I Think I've played with Titus a fair number of times. And she's pretty much always lynched within the first three days, unless she's scum, so yeah she's pretty damned easy to lynch.
That said, I don't think two scum are going to fake guilties on one mislynch.
Farside- you said you checked Titus too and had to verify something. You initially voted Saint so that makes me think you didn't necessarily have a guilty. Can you paraphrase the confirmation you received without compromising your role?
I targetted titus. I'm not a cop.
Why would you think scum would fake a guilty out the gate?
In post 2078, Jaqen Hghar wrote:In post 2069, farside22 wrote:In post 2067, Jaqen Hghar wrote:I don't care for guessing the reliability so of guilties. If she flips and it's not scum then, logically, it's your turn to eat it. I Think I've played with Titus a fair number of times. And she's pretty much always lynched within the first three days, unless she's scum, so yeah she's pretty damned easy to lynch.
That said, I don't think two scum are going to fake guilties on one mislynch.
Farside- you said you checked Titus too and had to verify something. You initially voted Saint so that makes me think you didn't necessarily have a guilty. Can you paraphrase the confirmation you received without compromising your role?
I targetted titus. I'm not a cop.
Why would you think scum would fake a guilty out the gate?
The moment you said you were clarifying something with the mod, I too sent them a question and have yet to hear back from them yet you had a response from them and enough time to throw down a vote afterwards in just 13 minutes. I've been waiting the better part of an hour. But, I'm playing along all the same and think it'll be good to see how this plays out.
Are you going to answer my question about why did you vote for Saint if you had mod info that would make you vote Titus?
In post 2076, masters of fart wrote:Is this multiball or was pisskop bogged or something just wondering.
We could get that guy to help remove one of Titus/jaqen
In post 2081, Jaqen Hghar wrote:In post 2076, masters of fart wrote:Is this multiball or was pisskop bogged or something just wondering.
We could get that guy to help remove one of Titus/jaqen
That would be pretty much impossible since my neighbor and I vigged Pisskop. We both had varying degrees of a scum read on him and ultimately decided that no matter how he flipped the instant POE that's possible from both of yesterday's leading wagons would be invaluable. Now that's out of the bag, can we discuss the ons and offs and relations provided by that info before just quick lynching Titus? I haven't even looked at it yet but plan to when I wake up. Between work and pregnant daughter (due in 4 weeks) acting like she was going to give birth, I haven't had time for more than a few quick read and comment here and there.
Pedit-youbrought upyourrole,yourtarget,yourclarification, andyourvote- not me. You can't reasonably expect to have no questions about whatyouhave put out there.
Ppedit ok, but why saint you *think could be* scum over what with mod clarification looks like must be verified scum?
In post 2080, farside22 wrote:I voted for saint because I was scum reading him at the end of day 1.
I voted for titus because I believe gork.
In post 2084, farside22 wrote:In post 2081, Jaqen Hghar wrote:In post 2076, masters of fart wrote:Is this multiball or was pisskop bogged or something just wondering.
We could get that guy to help remove one of Titus/jaqen
That would be pretty much impossible since my neighbor and I vigged Pisskop. We both had varying degrees of a scum read on him and ultimately decided that no matter how he flipped the instant POE that's possible from both of yesterday's leading wagons would be invaluable. Now that's out of the bag, can we discuss the ons and offs and relations provided by that info before just quick lynching Titus? I haven't even looked at it yet but plan to when I wake up. Between work and pregnant daughter (due in 4 weeks) acting like she was going to give birth, I haven't had time for more than a few quick read and comment here and there.
Pedit-youbrought upyourrole,yourtarget,yourclarification, andyourvote- not me. You can't reasonably expect to have no questions about whatyouhave put out there.
Ppedit ok, but why saint you *think could be* scum over what with mod clarification looks like must be verified scum?
You going to awnser my question or just keep playing with yourself.
In post 2079, farside22 wrote:In post 2078, Jaqen Hghar wrote:In post 2069, farside22 wrote:In post 2067, Jaqen Hghar wrote:I don't care for guessing the reliability so of guilties. If she flips and it's not scum then, logically, it's your turn to eat it. I Think I've played with Titus a fair number of times. And she's pretty much always lynched within the first three days, unless she's scum, so yeah she's pretty damned easy to lynch.
That said, I don't think two scum are going to fake guilties on one mislynch.
Farside- you said you checked Titus too and had to verify something. You initially voted Saint so that makes me think you didn't necessarily have a guilty. Can you paraphrase the confirmation you received without compromising your role?
I targetted titus. I'm not a cop.
Why would you think scum would fake a guilty out the gate?
The moment you said you were clarifying something with the mod, I too sent them a question and have yet to hear back from them yet you had a response from them and enough time to throw down a vote afterwards in just 13 minutes. I've been waiting the better part of an hour. But, I'm playing along all the same and think it'll be good to see how this plays out.
Are you going to answer my question about why did you vote for Saint if you had mod info that would make you vote Titus?
No I'm not.
I'm not putting my role in a bastard game.
I'm assuming there is a Roleblockerbut thanks for helping scum.
In post 2088, Gorkington wrote:happy birthday jaqen pt1:
modguy wrote:vezokpiraka (13) - Xtoxm, White Narcissus, Profgessor Emotion, Slobberknocker, Flubbernugget, Oversoul, farside22, pisskop, Titus, Gorkington, Jaqen Hghar, Saint, Anenien
Spoiler: vezo votes
In post 2094, Jaqen Hghar wrote:Far from a newb, tyvm. To vote so,eome other than your guilty is sketchy. The target gained by discussing your results is diminished by the already effing huge you hung on yourself by saying you had results in the first place. Nah, I'm not taking that blame. You can piss off right there. You voluntarily threw it out there you got results by targetting Titus, then you "clarified" those results through the mod, then you say the mod got back with you to make that clarification (which, quite frankly, I don't believe because I sent them a question at the exact same time which has still yet to be answered so I don't think they're around TO answer) and changed your vote from someone you *think* is guilty to someone you claim to havea *mod confirmed* guilty on.
And now you want to get all pretentious and name cally because someone is raising valid questions you apparently can't answer? If Titus is scum, you're probably scum with them seeing she's fucked and looking for an easy way on. Because there's no effing way answering questions about your results is "helping scum" more than YOU claiming to have some sort of an investigative PR in the first place.
In post 2095, Gorkington wrote:she didnt claim to have a mod confirmed guilty on titus.
shes also probably still town.
i hope.