With regards to the evidence themselves, if I tilt my head funny,
In post 3865, Metal Sonic wrote:In post 3861, Reasonably Rational wrote:In post 3859, NicCage wrote:Nah I'm only a stump for this day phase.
Constantines post have looked bad to me for awhile, though grapes brought up a good point about him being in both Frogger and maxwells lynch pools. I remember maxwell going after bins for awhile too. However, I can't remember who brought it up before, but someone pointed out that bins really put the brakes on the raging bull wagon D1, and was town reading Frogger for pretty poor reasons, while preferring a beer lynch for information. I wouldn't count him out.
I'm wondering what characters would share a pt with steven. I really think a mass flavor claim would be helpful.
Also I agree that it's strange that Sonic's role is the only one that doesn't require a specific phrase to activate an ability, though it's possible that there are no phrases associated with his character.
Another thing I want to mention is that I still think it's odd that TW is the only gem without specific alliance and fusion abilities.They're claiming that could have been intended to protect Frogger from my setup spec.
Mass Flavor claim pretty please
Where did they claim that? They also claimed in our pt that their role cop was tied to alliances/fusions but they just didn't notice at first.
Also, to everyone: What would be your first assumption if someone displayed knowledge of an aspect of another players role which they had no way of knowing? There is no combination of alliance meetings by which said knowledge could have reached the player, and the information has absolutely not been shared in this thread.
-Cerb
That is a serious crime. I would se if the evidence is explicitly damning or could it be ambiguous misreading. If it is confirmed scum then I will destroy the scumbag.
I noticed those posts that you quoted when you posted them, and yes I found those statements redundant. Like, "gives me back my refilled ability" on first thought could have meant "give me back my gladiate", but she already mentioned that "my gladiate is full".
I think that your evidence is not explicitly damning enough, but for discussion, let's say it is true.
Your case has a really huge hole when it comes to describing TW scum = me scum. Why must be
You are facing
I'm not even defending myself yet. Just poking your case here. It is obvious to everybody that I can be considered confirmed town by play.