Glork[3] (Crub, LML,vendagoat,)
AutumnEvenings{AE}[2] (Stewie, CTD)
Crub[2] (Glork,mneme)
LML[1] (,AE)
Sefer[1] (xyzzy)
Not Voting[0] (no one)
With 12 alive, It will take 7 to Lynch.
Deadline in 12 hours or So.
Your post implied there was more to it than what you'd posted, that's all. Sorry for misunderstanding.Glork wrote:Minor FoS: Mertfor paying no attention whatsoever. Seriously. What the hell?
Ah.Crub wrote:That's not the post where I'm supposed to be protecting xyzzy thats the post where I'm pointing out that if MBL can't read the mod's unvote/vote policy on that same page, then I'm not putting much stock in his opinion of the rest of the thread.mneme wrote: I don't see crub's protection of xyz. But crub copped to it, which is even more curious.
This is a no-doc, no mason game.Crub wrote: Anyway whats wrong with protecting xyzzy? Theres only something wrong with protecting someone if theres a good case the person you're protecting is scum and theres not much of a case against xyzzy at the moment.
First off, stop being condescending. I play my game my way. Instead, if you're really the doctor, you played in such a way that you GARNERED suspicion. My case on you was a good one. In other words, if someone ELSE would have made that case, I would have jumped on it. It was a strong case. You were the one playing poorly, not me.Glork wrote:And, a note, LmL: I amSEVERELYdisappointed in your play so far. You concocted this idea that I'm scum based on your own chosen interpretation of my play, completely choosing to ignore/disbelieve the truth. I'd really expected you to be open to the possibility that I just didn't think about CTD's posting as being buddying. I haven't yet decided if your chosen interpretations are scummy, or just an indication that you're playing poorly this time around, but there is *SO MUCH GOOD INFO* all over the place, and you've just tunnelled on me. Bad LmL. You should be more observant.FoS/IGMEOY: LML. Everyone, keep a very scrutinizing eye on this guy. He could very well be scum, too. LML, if youaretown, hopefully this will serve as a wake-up call.
Umm...was this to me? If so, re-read my post--I saidXYZ wrote:Are you giving up because you're scum?
Way to not commit to anything there...vendagoat wrote:Ok so far we have two pairs of two going back and forth right now.
Glork and Sefar are both arguing and Xyz and Mert. So now the question is are these the two mafia groups stirring up trouble?
FOS: all four of you. Because so far it's all crap logic started from a bandwagon vote. Problem is, Xyz is still flying around all willy nilly like and that to me is very scummy. Second biggest scum trait is the constant barrage of accusations, thats Glork in my eyes.
I'm a bit hesitant to put another vote on XYZ as it would bring him -2 coupled that we still have a day or two to still talk I am going to hold off till sometime Tuesday to vote.
Till then I am keeping my eyes open. Oh and I guess since I have a random vote out I better cancel that till Tuesday. UNVOTE
Hmm. Well, I'llGuardianMod wrote:PBug has requested replacement -- LoudmouthLee replaces PBug, effective immediately!
Who the hell puts someone at L-1 without intent to lynch? Bad, bad. I don'tMrBuddyLee wrote:vote: xyzzyto get a wagon going quickly. This is not an indication of intent to lynch.
Ok, I've never played with Jeep and no offense to him but what's so magic about #3? I've found mid-to-late (but not last), which, coincidentally, is right where your previous incarnation's vote landed (#4) on XYZ.LoudmouthLee wrote:I'm still a subscriber to the "Third vote on the bandwagon is scum" tell a-la-Jeep... <snip>
Your wagon was completely baseless, and I'm not sold on your allignment either way. Couple that with the fact that you were away (and you let everyone KNOW that you were away...) It seemed dangeous.By the way...any special reason your focusing on my wagon, as opposed to XYZ's? 'Cause even if you're scum, you have no way of knowing my allignment (pro-town, by the way :p)...so your focus on my wagon seems very odd.
what and not vote and get fosed for being an indecisive jerk?LoudmouthLee wrote:Well I'm stumped.FoS: Vendagoat
I hate people who say their stumped. It gives them an "out" if their wrong.
Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.MrBuddyLee wrote:Glork, why the HELL would you think xyzzy was town this game? Read his posts. And did you even bother for an instant to analyze the main reason I voted for him--the tone of his "it's a trap" comment?
Scum fear traps, not town... I think it's a legit slip by scum.
Right.. but by you posting "I'm stumped" and letting everyone KNOW that you're stumped is much different that actually being stumped.Vendagoat wrote:what and not vote and get fosed for being an indecisive jerk?LoudmouthLee wrote:Well I'm stumped.FoS: Vendagoat
I hate people who say their stumped. It gives them an "out" if their wrong.
my choices. leave my vote on a claimed doc-bad
lurk-bad
just not vote-bad
vote with a reason-just less bad.
the name of the game is mafia bud, everything sucks.
It was not a "good one." It was basedLoudmouthLee wrote:First off, stop being condescending. I play my game my way. Instead, if you're really the doctor, you played in such a way that you GARNERED suspicion. My case on you was a good one. In other words, if someone ELSE would have made that case, I would have jumped on it. It was a strong case. You were the one playing poorly, not me.