In post 299, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Everyone not voting should vote.
Speaking of voting, explain your vote on pisskop, please.
In post 299, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Everyone not voting should vote.
In post 277, Wake1 wrote:Grib
(37) | (89) | (103) | (218) | (220) | (221)
What We Know
Votes Silverwolf in 37. Votes FA_Q2 in 89. Says he wants to see what happens in regards to Wolfie's inquiry into his naked vote (103). Complains of fluffy spam in 218, and asks FA_Q2 to pressure him. Makes known his dread for Large games in 220, and opines in 221 that Boonskiies is suspicious in general, and, though unasked, tells acryon he thinks he's Town.
How I'm Reading This
His apparent reason for voting FA_Q2 is fine with me, because in general it's good to vote somebody to spur reactions. My case is special, because my history contains those who either kill me first, or try to manipulate my intense focus. By withholding my vote, they cannot control it, and I'll swing my sword down whenIam ready. His complaining of spam and fluff feels misplaced, because it's not like he's been doing much, and he can certainly wade into the discussion and contribute instead of complaining. Instead of asking someone to pressure him, perhaps he should be trying to pressure others? While I don't get the feeling these events are suspicious, they do feel neutral at best, and sub-optimal at worst. Am curious why he thinks Boonskiies is suspicious in general.
What I do find just a bit suspicious is his seemingly out-of-place comment that he thinks acryon is Town so very early in this game.
Where The Player Stands
Unremarkable Neutrality.Instead of complaining, do please contribute. An explanation for your unsought and untimely trust in acryon ought to be given in detail.
In post 278, SilverWolf wrote:Wake, Why not ask Grib straight out why he's townreading acryon or finds Boon suspicious?
I do agree that his townread on acryon is off considering acryon hasn't done anything especially townie in this game.
I will also say that Grib has a history of voting me first in games we play together and has used the totally rolled town line it 2 other games we've played where he's been town. He was scum with me in a game and was townread by pretty much everyone.
So Grib's actually a light townread for me just because his nonchalant attitude is pretty typical for him as town, where as scum he puts more effort in.
You can check Ika's 402 to see the scum game I'm talking about if it interests you. It's not quite the same set-up because Grib and I and Xay were all on different teams by ourselves and House was also in that game as town. http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=84&t=59515
In post 280, elusive wrote:I also know Grib from a off-site thing and I agree with SilverWolf's read of him. She also leans town to me.
In post 299, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Everyone not voting should vote.
In post 248, Boonskiies wrote:@T S O - You're right...damn it! We had a moment. BoonS O for life!
In post 253, SilverWolf wrote:I don't especially like TSO's entrance into this game at all and I'm perfectly fine with my vote where it is.
In post 254, dragonspawn wrote:In post 253, SilverWolf wrote:I don't especially like TSO's entrance into this game at all and I'm perfectly fine with my vote where it is.
it does seem like alot more effort than I usually see when I'm in a game with him but who knows at this point.
In post 256, Shinobi wrote:If TSO is townreading me, that means he's buddying me and is scum.
(His catchup is actually kind of good and I'm parsing it now.)
In post 257, Shinobi wrote:TSO, why exactly do you think viking's post is town?
In post 258, Aeronaut wrote:T S O's catchup was good, IMO... however it does seem sort off from what your average T S O does work-wise. It almost struck me as a Wake post, which is basically the polar opposite.
In post 262, SilverWolf wrote:
I've never played with TSO before but his reads just did not seem genuine. I mean he gave a town read to vikingfan and Jared over nothing posts, and then with Shinobi it was bad when he called for everyone to pile on but then it was super towny when Shinobi was talking about how tough TSO was to read and why he was applying pressure and then he goes on to defend Shinobi against one of dragonspawn's comments which just looked like buddying to me. Then called me bad for not calling for a prod with my vote but Aero sheeped me and that was town which was just inconsistent and not genuine at all.
In post 263, elusive wrote:In post 241, T S O wrote:In post 48, elusive wrote:Hmm...three votes on Grib. That's odd so soon.
FA_QT and crosboss, avatars?
Vote TSOfor being late to the party.
Wait, so you found it weird Grib had three votes, and proceeded to place my fourth vote?
Explain this to me.
What's there to explain?
In post 264, pisskop wrote:In post 228, T S O wrote:get deathtunneled son
Soo, referencing the last game we played a year ago is abadthing? I'm kind of sad; I thought I was good for spotting scum 200 posts in . . .
In post 265, FA_Q2 wrote:
I could hardly call what TSO did here as playing...
http://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/o ... ce.377844/
I do believe that this is the same TSO.
not sure what to make of TSO's reads at this point. While they are fairly weak almost the entire thread has been fluff so there is little to build a read on.
In post 282, Klingoncelt wrote:Happy Scumday, TSO!
In post 300, House wrote:In post 299, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Everyone not voting should vote.
Speaking of voting, explain your vote on pisskop, please.
In post 48, elusive wrote:Hmm...three votes on Grib. That's odd so soon.
FA_QT and crosboss, avatars?
Vote TSOfor being late to the party.
In post 83, SilverWolf wrote:All right TSO, you've been posting elsewhere. There's no excuse any more. Get in here and play.
VOTE: TSO
In post 88, vikingfan wrote:I can get on board with a TSO wagon since he's obviously lurkingunvoteVOTE: tso
In post 280, elusive wrote:I also know Grib from a off-site thing and I agree with SilverWolf's read of him. She also leans town to me.
In post 309, elusive wrote:
I have setup questions or I guess what is this type of setup called and is there a Wiki with possible roles and number of town, scum and any third parties?
In post 305, Albert B. Rampage wrote:In post 300, House wrote:In post 299, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Everyone not voting should vote.
Speaking of voting, explain your vote on pisskop, please.
He appears scummy.
In post 96, Aeronaut wrote:Ok. Let's generate discussion
@Everyone: what's the biggest flaw in your towngame? Your scumgame?
In post 54, Wake1 wrote:Pisskop looks like the kinda guy who might buckle under pressure. Maybe? I dunno.
In post 305, Albert B. Rampage wrote:He appears scummy.
In post 167, Cheetory6 wrote:I'm saying that her tone feels forced to me. That it seems to me like she's trying really hard to seem proactive in a way that I feel isn't real.Aero wrote:Are you saying SW has forced tone, or we do?
Idk, her tone feels genuine for now, to me, as well as similar to town games I've played with her.
@Silver, will lurk game you linked when I have some spare time tonight. Been putting off homework to be here. q.q
In post 220, Grib wrote:Normally I stick to micros.
In post 221, Grib wrote:
I tend to think Boonskiies is scummy in general, so I'll get back to you on that. Gun to head, null.
In post 252, dragonspawn wrote:Btw at this point I'm getting a scum vibe from shinobi and Viking
In post 303, SilverWolf wrote:In post 299, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Everyone not voting should vote.
Agree'd or tell us who you'd like to vote for.
In post 313, pisskop wrote:
In post 54, Wake1 wrote:Pisskop looks like the kinda guy who might buckle under pressure. Maybe? I dunno.
Yo. I suspect this is why.
In post 313, pisskop wrote:
Why would they tell us who they would like to instead of actually voting?
In post 317, pisskop wrote:What? I'm suggesting that ABR saw that line and decided to place a vote. From what I've seen of ABR, it seems to fit his general playstyle.
Why do you think I answering anything for Wake?
In post 318, SilverWolf wrote:Why would you just unvote instead of voting for your top scumread after just asking me that question about voting?
Why do you feel the need to answer for ABR?
In post 320, pisskop wrote:
Why do you feel the need to answer for ABR?
I was sharing what information I had. You asked ABR the same question as Acryon, in 300.
. Did you not find ABR's answer sufficient?
In post 318, SilverWolf wrote:In post 313, pisskop wrote:
Why would they tell us who they would like to instead of actually voting?
Because Wake is a paranoid freak about his vote and won't cast it unless he's good and ready because apparently it's so special we all want to manipulate it and force him to put it where we want it to go.
In post 322, Wake1 wrote:
Paranoia is sort of justified in Mafia, when you actually do have people in your group that want to deceive and murder you, so...
And as was said before, Scum-Belisarius is just one example of Scum trying to get me to mislynch someone. *Can provide links.