In post 1908, farside22 wrote:In post 1890, vezokpiraka wrote:I'm not lynching ceph day 1 when we have like 4 heavy lurkers.
Fuck your egos and lynch scum not inflate your self worth.
I agree with not lynching cephrir.
In post 1893, Solar Wind wrote:In post 1890, vezokpiraka wrote:I'm not lynching ceph day 1 when we have like 4 heavy lurkers.
Fuck your egos and lynch scum not inflate your self worth.
Since when did lynching lurkers equal lynching scum?
I won't help lynch a town read based on reasons I disagree with.
Still waiting for why rach is a town read.
Her case is not the same as mine at all.
I'm not clear as to how her case was different. Can you lay it out for me?
I've given my reasons for townreading Rach in my list of reads:
In post 1771, Solar Wind wrote:
4) RachMarie- Rach's initial aggression against the hydras felt genuine. Also thought the paranoia of Bitmap in Post 547 felt town especially given her earlier stance that Bitmap is good as scum. Her asking whether people think it is multiball in Post 636 felt less likely to come from scum as is the callout to Mastin to vote her despite us and Imperium townreading her which almost felt like a dare. Her overall generally demeanor feels overwhelmingly town and she drives the game forward at several points probing into people's reasoning for their reads and shepherding the non-voters into consolidating a wagon to avoid a deadline lynch. I have no idea why it matters that she confused Mastin with Bitmap. It doesn't take away from my townread in the slightest.
Can you explain your reasons for townreading Cephrir?